BanzaiPiluso Players 1,217 posts 13,126 battles Report post #1 Posted February 5, 2019 Another "fine tuning" by Wargaming. Now you can battle against Roma! 4 1 4 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[YJKG] Tirande Players 488 posts 26,237 battles Report post #2 Posted February 5, 2019 Source? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[X-10] ___V_E_N_O_M___ Players 2,129 posts 14,291 battles Report post #3 Posted February 5, 2019 https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/112852-st-premium-ships-and-soviet-battleships/?tab=comments#comment-2855513 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CBS] Allied_Winter Players 6,242 posts 10,755 battles Report post #4 Posted February 5, 2019 Just now, Tirande said: Source? WG's own DevBlog https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/112852-st-premium-ships-and-soviet-battleships/ 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HMSR] Major_Damage225 Beta Tester 2,875 posts 7,295 battles Report post #5 Posted February 5, 2019 This is going to end well Would be a first. GC is verry verry strong on T5, but i see a mini riot when people see T8's when playing it. 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,274 battles Report post #6 Posted February 5, 2019 Just now, Major_Damage225 said: This is going to end well Would be a first. With only a plating and burn chance modified i don't see any future for GC. With 406mm having 28mm overmatch it will be hell as the lowest HP BB at tier. And T6 gets uptiered +2 quite a lot. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[2DQT] RUSSIANBlAS Players 8,241 posts Report post #7 Posted February 5, 2019 It was very strong at T5 but that's just WG and their "liberal" balancing. If it was at T6 from the start with the stronger bow it likely wouldn't have been an issue. Now it's just another S*** storm to add to everything else. 10 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] ForlornSailor Players 7,374 posts 11,735 battles Report post #8 Posted February 5, 2019 WG seems to be tired of their own game. It starts to feel like very late at night at a bar. First, they stop serving you hard liqueur. then - no more beer. Next thing you know, the bartender shuts off all lights. By then you slowly start to realize "maybe its time to go home". 12 14 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[OYO] FooFaFie Players 837 posts Report post #9 Posted February 5, 2019 so people that bought the Cesare will get a cheap tier 6 BB...lucky bastards. I'm so jelly. 2 6 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BOTS] deadly_if_swallowed Players 1,678 posts 13,867 battles Report post #10 Posted February 5, 2019 Quote In this event, owners will be given the option to exchange the ship for doubloons. Nooooo Is there ANY use for doubloons at the moment? I got 82k from various compensations, latest one was 42k doubloons for my CVs. And I have no idea what to trade them for. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HMSR] Major_Damage225 Beta Tester 2,875 posts 7,295 battles Report post #11 Posted February 5, 2019 Just now, FooFaFie said: so people that bought the Cesare will get a cheap tier 6 BB...lucky bastards. I'm so jelly. Prolly people will riot for refunds. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BanzaiPiluso Players 1,217 posts 13,126 battles Report post #12 Posted February 5, 2019 Thanks for pasting the source guys! Not happy about this, is not like you are destroying the game with the GC. Is fun to fight against other GC and the Oktobrska, which by the way is also a bit OP. Just leave it alone Wargaming! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CHEFT] ForlornSailor Players 7,374 posts 11,735 battles Report post #13 Posted February 5, 2019 Just now, deadly_if_swallowed said: Is there ANY use for doubloons at the moments? I got 82k from various compensations, latest one was 42k doubloons for my CVs. And I have no idea what to trade them for. Glorious strategy. First, make people exchange real money for some ingame currency. Then make it useless. After that, offer refunds in that useless ingame currency. 17 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
creamgravy Players 2,780 posts 17,292 battles Report post #14 Posted February 5, 2019 This is a huge buff. Now you can use it for scenarios and farm tier 7/8 noobs. 2 2 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[2DQT] RUSSIANBlAS Players 8,241 posts Report post #15 Posted February 5, 2019 A meh T6 BB will be nothing new as no T6 BB is all that competitive vs T8 ones but they're not meant to be. T8 is the power hike tier where heavy armour and 16" guns start to become common so anything less will feel the pain. Often through the bow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] black_falcon120 Beta Tester 1,693 posts 4,658 battles Report post #16 Posted February 5, 2019 The people I pity are the ones who spent hundreds on Santa crates for it. 6 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] Verblonde Players 9,787 posts 20,620 battles Report post #17 Posted February 5, 2019 Presumably, this exercise is as much about testing customer reaction to this general approach as anything? If people don't go completely librarian-poo over this, then perhaps something similar will be applied to, notably, Belfast? I'm slightly surprised that GC got picked for the test though (unless they're thinking of doing a Boise/9dJ thing with her later - for the Russian BBs) - I would have expected it to simply be left as is, to serve as bait for Xmas boxes etc.... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[GEUS] TeaAndTorps Players 820 posts 2,680 battles Report post #18 Posted February 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, Negativvv said: Often through the bow Presumably teh GC will keep its reinforced bow though, so while it'll eat pens through the bow, it won't take citadels. Which is much the same as it has now. Although an HP buff may well be in order if it's going to face T8 MM. Presumably this is the kind of thing that testing aims to discover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[2DQT] RUSSIANBlAS Players 8,241 posts Report post #19 Posted February 5, 2019 Also notice how WG gave GC an even stronger torp belt but now decided to nerf. You really have to wonder do they ever think about what they're doing with their own game... Need more data eh? Guess it's finally lead to GC appearing OP, like all the feedback previously couldn't have told WG this and they continued to sell the ship. It's either sheer incompetence or a money grab, neither covers WG in glory. 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SM0KE] black_falcon120 Beta Tester 1,693 posts 4,658 battles Report post #20 Posted February 5, 2019 Just now, Verblonde said: I'm slightly surprised that GC got picked for the test though (unless they're thinking of doing a Boise/9dJ thing with her later - for the Russian BBs) - I would have expected it to simply be left as is, to serve as bait for Xmas boxes etc.... They couldn’t do the Belfast it is too popular and too iconic. The Russian thing is t4 iirc which leaves this or the kamikaze 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[MUMMY] rage1750 Players 824 posts 11,400 battles Report post #21 Posted February 5, 2019 Keep digging that hole WG, you will reach China soon! 11 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #22 Posted February 5, 2019 16 minutes ago, Aragathor said: With only a plating and burn chance modified i don't see any future for GC. With 406mm having 28mm overmatch it will be hell as the lowest HP BB at tier. And T6 gets uptiered +2 quite a lot. Giulio Cesare with 27 knots and best concealment will still be comparable to other T6 BBs when facing T8s. Additionally resistant plating and internal bow. Arizona for example might have more hp, but vastly worse armour and much less chance to get away. Normandie has a bit more hp than Giulio, but is much much worse in concealment. And both arizona and Normandie are not what people call bad T6 BBs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[CBS] Allied_Winter Players 6,242 posts 10,755 battles Report post #23 Posted February 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Verblonde said: notably, Belfast? Serb I hope not! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UNICS] Olonar Beta Tester 27 posts 12,216 battles Report post #24 Posted February 5, 2019 i really dont understand this timing. Not that the ship is not far to strong for its tier. But wargaming had once the policy of not nerving premiums. And now with all the backlash going on they want to nerv one. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TTTX] Tyrendian89 [TTTX] Players 4,608 posts 8,139 battles Report post #25 Posted February 5, 2019 well well well isnt this a hilarious admission of "our balancing department have effed up monumentally" 5 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites