Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
MistaBoo

CV's in Clan Battles? If not, Why not?

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[BOATY]
Players
105 posts

Why dont we ever see CV's in Clan Battles?

Surely with the rework and all its greatness according to WG then we must surely have them in CB's

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
27,474 posts
14,582 battles
9 minutes ago, MistaBoo said:

Why dont we ever see CV's in Clan Battles?

Surely with the rework and all its greatness according to WG then we must surely have them in CB's

After they finished reworking the rework, yes, sure.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XODUS]
Players
799 posts
4,866 battles
11 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

After they finished reworking the rework, yes, sure.

it would be nice to see them agreed, but the question is how too

some clan's struggle to get seven people online for specific times and days (i have a life outside of a video game, shocking i know)
do they increase the amount of "capital" ships and increase the amount of ships to 9 with up to 3 capital ships (2 BB's and 1 CV?)
do they create 8v8 and 7v7 clan wars with the 8v8 being 1 BB and 1 CV and the 7v7 being the same as we have now?

alot of questions to be answered

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,130 posts
11,043 battles

They have to include them in clans, just for the sake of saving the line. 

 

Not including the old system in clans was the kiss of death.

 

It will spice things up that's for sure! No longer will you have the same old camping meta and same old captain skills.

 

It's will be one hell of a scrap at the contenting cap that's for sure.  The one that holds it first, will win IMHO (constant planes)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-AP-]
Players
2,609 posts
6,386 battles

If they can actually balance it properly, sure. But if it keeps being as problematic as it is right now, I don't ever want to see them in a competitive mode

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BANCV]
Players
887 posts
12,804 battles
1 hour ago, Redcap375 said:

They have to include them in clans, just for the sake of saving the line. 

 

Not including the old system in clans was the kiss of death.

 

It will spice things up that's for sure! No longer will you have the same old camping meta and same old captain skills.

 

It's will be one hell of a scrap at the contenting cap that's for sure.  The one that holds it first, will win IMHO (constant planes)

Why do people think that more and easier spotting leads to less campy meta?

This is the golden rule in competitive "The easier you can spot the further away you will stay".

 

Reworked CVs would currently be horrible for the competitive meta (both CBs and King of the Sea formats). The reason for this is that atm the CV can spot anything it wants and AA is completely useless against preventing spotting. The absence of controllable fighters compounds this.

Currently the only tool you have at your disposal in order to stop being perma spotted by the enemy CV is to smoke up. Smoke fiestas leads to more camping.

Super fast planes spotting the enemy deployment within 1 min max of the battle start means that no real offensive plays can be used because they will immediately be detected and you can start to setup for the counter.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GRNPA]
Beta Tester
1,296 posts
42 minutes ago, Spithas said:

*snip*

Yeah, I also wonder everytime people come up with this "CV will prevent camping" nonsense.

 

Ships are not camping in the back because of the not spotted enemy ships, but because of the inevitable focus fire you will recieve once you are a few kilometers ahead of the rest. Same goes for the people who demand that CVs should have a high alpha strike to mop up camping BBs in the back, but never think about the fact that the BB that will get punished first is not the one camping in the back, but the one sitting in front actually trying to win the match. Also that is true for all classes, not the brain afk idiots in the back get molested by CVs, but rather the guys fighting for the caps.

 

No matter how you turn it, a class that can safely sit across the map behind an island while absolutely dominating the vision game while dishing out huge amounts of damage will never ever prevent camping at all, but rather enforce it.

 

 

A bit more on-topic:

 

I dont think WG should include CVs to clan wars, for the simple reason that CVs are still and will stay pretty unpopular. Combined with the fact that only a small percentage of the playerbase is even participating in clan wars, this would create yet another split among the community. The very few clans who can field a good CV and the rest who cant and thus will get stomped. If you look into clan wars, a lot of the small clans cant even field correct set-ups because their players already lack the correct ships. Make CVs another requirement and they are out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
5,093 posts
20,337 battles

The issue here world be they pretty much would have to only match teams up that both have CV....  

This for reasons that other people have stated..

 

If CV's brought to battle stays under 2% mark of ships brought to game at tier X. I cant see how CV's can be brought to Clan battles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,241 posts
11,737 battles

This is from WoT but the CV thing sounds a lot like Artillery Prevents Camping :cap_haloween:

 

Also remains to be seen if anyone is actually playing by the time the next CB season comes round :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×