Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
wot_chikor

*edited* ( about 0.8 )

82 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
475 posts
15,095 battles

no introduction ,  you should all just  stop complaing  because i am sick of it .

 

*edited* ,guess what , i like it , if you dont like it ,, dont play it , CV playerbase was 2% , why now everyone is crying about cvs ?  *edited*
we  should all focus on more important matters :

 

1 first of all , flint *edited* ,,,,, i got it and its so  bad  WG , you need to  buff if , give it more range and 152 mm guns ffs , i wasted all myy steel for it . its a WEAK ship .

2 : i got recently moskva and khabarovsk *edited* ,why does one  have to  get 14km concelemnt ? and the other  get 11 km range on her 130 mm ? *edited*3 : ranked game mode , ,,, i am sorry but its just a joke , i give it 2 / 10 ,,, *edited*  . it doesn't also help because your CCs told them that dds  wll be the best class for ranked , now  we get 3 and 4 dds each team , *edited*

 

at the end i must say i understand the pressure on you WG , you can't fix everthing at once ,  i hope you focus on the CVs for now , the consept is good , don't listen  to  whiners , they will always find something to cry about . make sure by next one or two patchs the numbers are balanced ... 

cheers 

  • Cool 8
  • Funny 11
  • Boring 7
  • Bad 31

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PORT]
Beta Tester
333 posts
6,438 battles

I agree with you completely but please understand people have a right to complain about what they want. I personally love the new CVs but I see some of the issues ( like DD spotting ).  It's just how it is, people will whine about changes to kingdom come but just leave it be. It's a way to vent and express frustration and we're all entitled to that. For all you know, that 2% is very very unhappy.

  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
2 minutes ago, Winged_Cat_Dormant said:

That is hard to read.

Complaining and offering solutions is the only way to achieve change, sorry.

sir there is a good fine line between complaining and what we see now , if an admin on wowos facebook page ask witch ship you think is better , fletsher or  yugomo , then you anwser or stfu , you dont copmlain about CVs ,,,,   go read comments there ...... 

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 1
  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
2 minutes ago, MrWastee said:

woat ....da.....chickenor.................:Smile_popcorn:

dont start personal attacks , no need for drama mr wastee :p 

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
3 minutes ago, Atris2nd said:

I agree with you completely but please understand people have a right to complain about what they want. I personally love the new CVs but I see some of the issues ( like DD spotting ).  It's just how it is, people will whine about changes to kingdom come but just leave it be. It's a way to vent and express frustration and we're all entitled to that. For all you know, that 2% is very very unhappy.

you are right , but  give them a break man ,,,,,,  they said this patch  they wll be monitoring numbers , the rework is not over yet .... 

  • Cool 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
2,626 posts
18,696 battles

Moskva is crap? You must be smoking some DANK OG bud

 

How do you propose they give Flint 152mm guns? It was a real ship of the Atlanta class, not a paper design. It was equipped with 127mm GUNS

 

I'm actually enjoying ranked this time. I find it a nice change, and it's pretty interesting. Just my view. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
1 minute ago, Miragetank90 said:

Moskva is crap? You must be smoking some DANK OG bud

 

How do you propose they give Flint 152mm guns? It was a real ship of the Atlanta class, not a paper design. It was equipped with 127mm GUNS

 

I'm actually enjoying ranked this time. I find it a nice change, and it's pretty interesting. Just my view. 

oh boy so you disagree with everything i just said ,,,, thats nice .... btw  moskva is  almost as good as henri and wooster and stalingrad right ? right 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Players
4,506 posts
15,942 battles
13 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

...don't listen  to  whiners , they will always find something to cry about ...

I found a good piece in it :Smile_Default:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
2 minutes ago, loppantorkel said:

I found a good piece in it :Smile_Default:

wait , what do you mean ? did you just fire at me with my own weapon ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
2,626 posts
18,696 battles
1 minute ago, wot_chikor said:

oh boy so you disagree with everything i just said ,,,, thats nice .... btw  moskva is  almost as good as henri and wooster and stalingrad right ? right 

 

Is it a crime to disagree with his highness? You bet your [edited]I disagree. 

Interesting that you compare Moskva to Henri and Wooster since these are all fundamentally different ships which have different play styles.

A more reasonable comparison is Moskva to Stalingrad. Even then, Moskva has it's merits and I enjoy both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EMPOR]
Players
982 posts

A guy complaining about others complaining about things they don't like. And then he starts complaining about Flint, Moskva, Khabarovsk and ranked games.

 

2/10

At least you tried.

  • Cool 8
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
1 minute ago, Miragetank90 said:

 

Is it a crime to disagree with his highness? You bet your [edited]I disagree. 

Interesting that you compare Moskva to Henri and Wooster since these are all fundamentally different ships which have different play styles.

A more reasonable comparison is Moskva to Stalingrad. Even then, Moskva has it's merits and I enjoy both.

ye sorry i dont ttake criticism  lightly  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but okey maybe  the ship is fine and i just dont know how   to play with it , and  by accident i have almost 50% winrate and avergae dmg in henri .....  hell i  have better avergae in des moins witc his my first cruser  that i leaned to play with , a year ago . 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
1 minute ago, _DemonGuard_ said:

A guy complaining about others complaining about things they don't like. And then he starts complaining about Flint, Moskva, Khabarovsk and ranked games.

 

2/10

At least you tried.

no , i am not complaining , 

or yes i am but in a good way ... this is called constructive feedback ,  not complaining 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
5,519 posts
2,939 battles
1 minute ago, wot_chikor said:

no , i am not complaining , 

or yes i am but in a good way ... this is called constructive feedback ,  not complaining 

 

No, that's complaining. There's nothing constructive in what you did.

  • Cool 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GRNPA]
Beta Tester
1,296 posts
10,330 battles

Complains about people complaining, in a internet forum, 11/10 moves man.

 

Also this was pretty much inevitable, WG didnt solve any issues but instead managed to make skyaids even more annoying. Chapeau.

  • Cool 4
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
Just now, LastButterfly said:

 

No, that's complaining. There's nothing constructive in what you did.

dont take what i said personal ,  we  are talking about some topics here not about me ,  leave me   out pls 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
144 posts
3,590 battles
21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

no introduction ,  you should all just  stop complaing  because i am sick of it .

 

*edited* ,guess what , i like it , if you dont like it ,, dont play it , CV playerbase was 2% , why now everyone is crying about cvs ?  *edited*
we  should all focus on more important matters :

 

1 first of all , flint *edited* ,,,,, i got it and its so  bad  WG , you need to  buff if , give it more range and 152 mm guns ffs , i wasted all myy steel for it . its a WEAK ship .

2 : i got recently moskva and khabarovsk *edited* ,why does one  have to  get 14km concelemnt ? and the other  get 11 km range on her 130 mm ? *edited*3 : ranked game mode , ,,, i am sorry but its just a joke , i give it 2 / 10 ,,, *edited*  . it doesn't also help because your CCs told them that dds  wll be the best class for ranked , now  we get 3 and 4 dds each team , *edited*

 

at the end i must say i understand the pressure on you WG , you can't fix everthing at once ,  i hope you focus on the CVs for now , the consept is good , don't listen  to  whiners , they will always find something to cry about . make sure by next one or two patchs the numbers are balanced ... 

cheers 

People are complaining because we are not listened: since the beginning of their patch (test ect), people said that this update is a mistake, a huge one. In addition of this fact, the new gameplay IS THE SAME for world of warplanes! Why ? Why?? Why doing 2 games with similar stuff? (except for console ofc).

After that, for the CV rework, the gameplay was better before this update (look at flambass video of this week: fun with hans episode 3 If I remember well) and they just needed to do changes in order to balance them: (old CV ofc)

- put fuel on the CVs it'll delet the problem of permanent spot for DDs

- delet AP bombs or decrease dmg (I hope it's the good word :d)

- decrease dmg of torps or -1 planes per squadron for torpedos

- add videos about how to play a CV: how to do manual ect (like they did for everything except old CV gameplay).

 

I think with this 4 points and old CV, it would be great. Idk if i'm the only one to regret a lot the old CVs but if WG wants to do it fair, they should ask to everyone who gets a WOW account which version they prefer: new CV gameplay or old one.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[EMPOR]
Players
982 posts
21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

*edited*

 

21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

*edited*

 

21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

just a joke

 

21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

*edited*

That sure sounds like:

 

21 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

constructive feedback

Ok, whatever you say.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[XTREM]
Players
2,626 posts
18,696 battles
9 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

ye sorry i dont ttake criticism  lightly  ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but okey maybe  the ship is fine and i just dont know how   to play with it , and  by accident i have almost 50% winrate and avergae dmg in henri .....  hell i  have better avergae in des moins witc his my first cruser  that i leaned to play with , a year ago . 

 

I didn't like Moskva either when I first got it a long time back. Nowadays I love it. It's about playing the ship to it's strengths, do this and Moskva will smile upon you.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
12 minutes ago, Dukewerth1 said:

People are complaining because we are not listened: since the beginning of their patch (test ect), people said that this update is a mistake, a huge one. In addition of this fact, the new gameplay IS THE SAME for world of warplanes! Why ? Why?? Why doing 2 games with similar stuff? (except for console ofc).

After that, for the CV rework, the gameplay was better before this update (look at flambass video of this week: fun with hans episode 3 If I remember well) and they just needed to do changes in order to balance them: (old CV ofc)

- put fuel on the CVs it'll delet the problem of permanent spot for DDs

- delet AP bombs or decrease dmg (I hope it's the good word :d)

- decrease dmg of torps or -1 planes per squadron for torpedos

- add videos about how to play a CV: how to do manual ect (like they did for everything except old CV gameplay).

 

I think with this 4 points and old CV, it would be great. Idk if i'm the only one to regret a lot the old CVs but if WG wants to do it fair, they should ask to everyone who gets a WOW account which version they prefer: new CV gameplay or old one.

no dont lie ,  when they showed us the rework in the first time ,  people gave thier aproval of the consept ,  YOU  told WG that this idea is good keep working on it, i  remember all those 2 hours long Q&A where  you guys told them its a good conespt , ( and IT is ) so dont say we todl them its a  huge mistake .

also , the 4 points you montioned , i agree , but  give them time one or two patchs so they can see whats wrong , thaats my problem , you gusy are not giving them  time . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
475 posts
15,095 battles
15 minutes ago, Tyrendian89 said:

you are juuust the guy to tell people to stop complaining lol

you have problem with that ?  i say it becasue  the complains are too mush and too bad, even for me .

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Miragetank90 said:

 

I didn't like Moskva either when I first got it a long time back. Nowadays I love it. It's about playing the ship to it's strengths, do this and Moskva will smile upon you.

 

hah sure i guess i just need to  git gud ......... sadly  the only ship that i suck in is the moska and not  any  other tier10 cruser ,  guess its my fault . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[GRNPA]
Beta Tester
1,296 posts
10,330 battles
2 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

hah sure i guess i just need to  git gud ......... sadly  the only ship that i suck in is the moska and not  any  other tier10 cruser ,  guess its my fault . 

 

Basing "evidence" solely on your personal experience is very smart. )))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×