Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
RepSrb

SuperYamato As Japans T10 Battleship

100 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[O-P-C]
Players
407 posts
8,821 battles

I have been thinking for a while , why not put yamato as T9 to make it competitive , and same tier with its brother musashi ,and make superyamato new T10 in line with other paper projects ships.

dcilonp-a5716a97-8161-4f88-ab52-e2afcb92c8d5.png

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 13
  • Bad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WOTN]
Quality Poster
2,111 posts
14,494 battles

Because the Yamato is strong enough at tier X and introducing the super-Yamato is trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist?

  • Cool 12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,631 posts
6,363 battles
2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

competitive

 

:cap_hmm:

 

Not sure whats too weak about it to be a T10?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
1,788 posts
1,671 battles

What super Yammie, the A-150? The current T10 Yammie has the best guns in game, can overmatch anything and even has excellent secondaries, not that BBabies ever get close to the enemy.

 

The A-150 is not needed

  • Cool 3
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
16,359 posts
11,328 battles
13 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

I have been thinking for a while , why not put yamato as T9 to make it competitive , and same tier with its brother musashi ,and make superyamato new T10 in line with other paper projects ships.

You want to put this on Tier IX?

image.thumb.png.433ccbf8a8c7d79eaeaf353cc9448e54.png

 

http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20181222/eu_2month/average_ship.html

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YARRR]
Beta Tester
8,723 posts
14,669 battles

I guess Habakkuk as the T10 RN CV sounds reasonable, too.

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,144 posts
245 battles

if your going to have the superyamato they might as well open up two more tiers i guess.

 

otherwise smoolll tier 7 boutes would get bullied too often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-P-C]
Players
407 posts
8,821 battles

Its worst of all t10 battleships and should be t9 and has no gimmicks like other powercreeped bbs , also least gunns and burns like hell with awfull AA,....

 Maybe lower its accuracy a bit and have superyamato as perfect t10 .

yes project a-150 but with 9 guns. 

  • Funny 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRON7]
Players
181 posts
1,052 battles

Saying that the strongest battleship ever built is weak and should be tiered lower. :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Afaik, even the Number 13 class wouldn't be out of place at tier 10 and that's a design from 1920 or something.

 

Think that 51cm cannons would actually pose more of a problem than Yammie's 46cm cannons are:

Too much penetration causing far too many overpens making it just frustrating to play since you can barely damage things properly unless you hit the citadel.

Or is it possible to overpen the citadel? :Smile_amazed:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YARRR]
Beta Tester
8,723 posts
14,669 battles
1 minute ago, RepSrb said:

its worst of all t10 battleships

5 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

image.thumb.png.433ccbf8a8c7d79eaeaf353cc9448e54.png

 

Clearly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,053 posts
7,982 battles
6 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

I guess Habakkuk as the T10 RN CV sounds reasonable, too.

I'm not sure it sounds reasonable -- but I WOULD pay money for it. :cap_money:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
4,631 posts
6,363 battles
5 minutes ago, Nishi_Kinuyo said:

Or is it possible to overpen the citadel? :Smile_amazed:

 

Yes.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,910 posts
6,248 battles
9 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

I guess Habakkuk as the T10 RN CV sounds reasonable, too.

Would have tonnes of hp, literaly but would strech from C cap all the way to A cap, turning radious? 4 maps? :Smile_veryhappy:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,607 posts
5,708 battles

Yeah, please put my Yamato at T9, Musashi can be T8. They feel so weak right now, with only 9 guns, when others get 12 and their speed is lackluster too. They burn a lot. I swear, more than any other T10. Every game fires make up so much of my damage taken. And yeah, T6s going up against Musashi might seem a bit silly, but Musashi's AA is T6 anyways, so it'll work out, right?

 

But honestly, Musashi at T9 is already questionable. Pushing the full Yamato down there is just retarded.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester, Players
3,371 posts
8,811 battles
28 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

I have been thinking for a while , why not put yamato as T9 to make it competitive , and same tier with its brother musashi ,and make superyamato new T10 in line with other paper projects ships.

 

a6984aabbb5d3a2249abac266b44bd2662146483

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[O-P-C]
Players
407 posts
8,821 battles
4 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

 

Clearly.

those are noobs, you cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. 

i see they have put musashi as t9 and noone complains .

many players would like super-yamato.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRON7]
Players
181 posts
1,052 battles
1 minute ago, RepSrb said:

those are noobs, you cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. 

i see they have put musashi as t9 and noone complains .

many players would like super-yamato.

Just because many players would like it doesn't mean it has a place in the game.

I greatly like the Space Battleship Yamato with its Wave Motion Cannon, but putting it in the game is beyond ludicrous.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[W-C]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,462 posts
6,635 battles
15 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

I guess Habakkuk as the T10 RN CV sounds reasonable, too.

Monty and erie for scale

6603f30e04.png

 

2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

those are noobs, you cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. 

You're a noob. You cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. A bad tier 10 BB he says
 

2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

i see they have put musashi as t9 and noone complains

Probably because in wows, musashi is worse than a yamato

 

2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

many players would like super-yamato.

Many wouldn't....what's your point?

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
16,359 posts
11,328 battles
2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

those are noobs, you cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. 

i see they have put musashi as t9 and noone complains .

Enough people complain...

 

image.thumb.png.da276ab83b6e8fec2e1c4e2b67a00267.png

 

Take note of damage, kills, survival and tanking...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,607 posts
5,708 battles
2 minutes ago, RepSrb said:

those are noobs, you cant pull noobstats out of your [edited]and make them fact. 

i see they have put musashi as t9 and noone complains .

many players would like super-yamato.

Musashi is a slightly nerfed Yamato and it's powercreeping the Izumo quite a bit. I wouldn't say that noone has any issue with Musashi at T9.

Also, A-150 would suck massively, as it'd basically be to Yamato what 457 Conq is to 419 Conq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,085 posts
6,476 battles
19 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

I guess Habakkuk as the T10 RN CV sounds reasonable, too.

 

Since in wows health is calculated by tonnage - can you image the health pool? Oh man, that would be a juicy target. But on the other hand: would it be immune to fire OR extremly vulnerable? :cap_yes:

 

7 minutes ago, Riselotte said:

Yeah, please put my Yamato at T9, Musashi can be T8.

 

Pff. Then they suffer from bad matchmaking all the time. Hello, you forgot T8 MM? There is only one reasonable solution. Oh yes, you know it. Yamato to T5 (nah still bad matchmaking tbh) Yamato to T4!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
Players
4,213 posts
7,925 battles
3 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

Oh yes, you know it. Yamato to T5 (nah still bad matchmaking tbh) Yamato to T4!

remove main guns but leave everything else as is (including ManSec working as if it werent low tier), and you'd actually be in business with that lol

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,144 posts
245 battles
3 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

Since in wows health is calculated by tonnage - can you image the health pool? Oh man, that would be a juicy target. But on the other hand: would it be immune to fire OR extremly vulnerable? :cap_yes:

 

 

Pff. Then they suffer from bad matchmaking all the time. Hello, you forgot T8 MM? There is only one reasonable solution. Oh yes, you know it. Yamato to T5 (nah still bad matchmaking tbh) Yamato to T4!

imagine it ramming your ship though.

 

sudden lag and your suddenly in another game at a random tier and match point lol with 1%hp left.

 

oh and put the yamato at tier 3 musashi at tier 2 and super at tier 4 maybe a hyper yamato with 62cm guns at tier 5 for perfect balancing.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×