Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Migantium_Mashum

Yeuyang post Nerf with Poll.

Yeuyang results.  

71 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you played your yeuyang since the Nerf?

    • Yes.
      44
    • No.
      27
  2. 2. If you have played your Yeuyang did you find the Nerf a handicap?

    • Yes.
      54
    • No.
      17
  3. 3. Did you sell your Yeuyang without giving her a try?

    • Yes.
      4
    • No.
      67

37 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[CMWR]
Players
3,817 posts
21,306 battles

I played YY only once today in CB and it felt very weak, torps reloading ages vs Gearing with 10.5, which gunned me down later easily. The only plus is radar. Switched to Haragumo, as it is better to have too much of DMP then too little. At least I could burn some CAs and kill DDs not to be killed by them.  In randoms, I  see no reason to take it instead of Chung Mu. The same gun DMP plus better concealment and much more torps and sometimes she sees a T9 game. I will move my captain soon.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,467 posts
22,105 battles
3 hours ago, loppantorkel said:

I wonder how it takes for WG to find out..:Smile_ohmy:

Well...Maybe they will buff the YY by giving it Chung Mu torpedoes, Gearing style :Smile_amazed: 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PEZ]
Players
11,301 posts
39,484 battles

I still play it in CW but onle couse of radar and i must admit i take out gearing more and more often instead, even took out a shima for one of matches yesterday, also daring is underwhealming, lack of speed(boost) really hurts its utility with only few ships per team on those big maps...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,842 posts
38,926 battles

Looking the stats from maplesyrup site for last two weeks difference is quite significant. From second best by WR and third by average damage ...

 

2015681273_Screenshot_2018-12-03ListofAllShipAverages.thumb.png.0766498993d413d6e1e6560b01399a3c.png

 

... to last place by WR and fifth by average damage ...

 

760430859_Screenshot_2018-12-03ListofAllShipAverages(1).thumb.png.ce84c6fa302167f4d64e8fc4a9ffd4a5.png

 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CMWR]
Players
3,817 posts
21,306 battles

Now time for buff so in a Hinderburgs style they will give her one more smoke because of reasons. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SM0KE]
Players
9,787 posts
20,582 battles

FWIW I think I only saw one YY during perhaps two hours of CW play yesterday; it could be for reasons other than the nerf, I suppose, but they do seem to have become rather rare beasts...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
809 posts

Everyones favourite tier X seal clubber has been nerfed? Good.. good :cap_book:

 

It’s not the only line where the tier IX is preferable, Fletcher comes to mind.

 

Oh, and stop complaining about changes, you make a disgrace of the human race when doing so. We’re supposed to be able to evolve with changes, not die out like.... I don’t know.... some specialized mouse in himaleya that only eats highland mosquitoes...

 

Grow some hair on your chests :cap_cool:

 

Okay, that was probably a little over the top :cap_popcorn:

  • Bad 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BONI]
Players
1,622 posts
20,823 battles

I won't touch it as it is. Statistically, it's sub-t9 material now compared to Chung Mu. Apart from some minor things (HP, torp launch angles, radar duration), Chung Mu has it beat in so many other ways. Speed, stealth, torps, turret traverse, turret quantity.  I swear, if they nerf CM to make it ''in line'' with YY, I'm not spending another cent on this game. Taking a bat to the DPM to make up for the radar being OP in a specific mode is amazingly incompetent to begin with, but they better keep it contained to t10. Hell, I'd rather lose the damn radar, it's going to be much more painful to use after the CV resurgence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[2DQT]
Players
8,241 posts

The irony is WG always say "blah blah we try to make our tech tree lines coherant". Like Grozo being placed in there when the RU DD line split with Trashkan as the T9 progression into the Khaba. The reason why Nelson was a unique FXP ship rather than sitting at T7 with KGV at T8 etc etc

 

As in there should be a natural progression.

 

So why is the top of the tech tree been nerfed into an underpowered joke?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AAO]
Players
1,597 posts
21,844 battles

What do you guys think, incoming YY buff in 7.13-14 ?

Not to the old lvl (cuz reasons) but maybe shave off .5s/15s on gun/torp reload ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
[CR33D]
Players
3,842 posts
38,926 battles
9 minutes ago, rnat said:

What do you guys think, incoming YY buff in 7.13-14 ?

Not to the old lvl (cuz reasons) but maybe shave off .5s/15s on gun/torp reload ?

 

 That would mean that WG would admit they made a mistake and stick with it. If WG buff it would be some stupid buff like "Here, have one more radar and smoke consumable so that we can now even more promote its unique strengths. What, you can't utilize it because of balanced reload? Well then, here one more radar and smoke consumable to compensate for that".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×