the queen , gold bless her ( cv rant )

[GarrusBrutus]

On 11/26/2018 at 1:34 PM, Lieut_Gruber said:

Well, to that keeper example: if the goal keeper is allowed to make his goal as small as 1mx1m, and has 2 of the best defenders in the world, he could switch to striker to get a challenge yes.

But somehow I think you are not interested in a challenge, just empty stats who don't mean *edited since you got them by abusing a broken shipclass, and amplifying that with the division setup.

 

There are people who have played thousands of battles in one ship. Some are bad and some are really good. But if they enjoy it then who are you to judge them? Sure it's annoying when you run into the same guys (or girls @Xairen) and you lose to them, but if it tilts you that much you could do the same or switch tiers for a couple of battles. 

[Commander_Cornflakes]

Vor 57 Minuten, wot_chikor sagte:

i didnt montion your name nor your civision mates , but he clearly showed messages with my name witch is against therules witch is a banabale offence .

And I worked so hard to copy your censoring skills as exactly as possible

[wot_chikor]

2 hours ago, GarrusBrutus said:

There are people who have played thousands of battles in one ship. Some are bad and some are really good. But if they enjoy it then who are you to judge them? Sure it's annoying when you run into the same guys (or girls @Xairen) and you lose to them, but if it tilts you that much you could do the same or switch tiers for a couple of battles. 

if it wass a fair fight she is not my league , not even the same post code . i met her few tiems in ranked , its sad how does 2 ships in division who are so dedicated to help her for months day and night tured her into a superunicum .

[XAlREN]

Did u realy need 474 battles for rank 1 in season 10?

 

Well ...

 

let me repeat this in words

fourhuuuuuuuundred ?!?!!! seventy four?!

[wot_chikor]

2 minutes ago, Xairen said:

Did u realy need 474 battles for rank 1 in season 10?

 

Well ...

i play it for fun i try all my tier10 ships , do you know whats fun or u know only winrate with monotaur ? 

[XAlREN]

What is fun?

I don't think i want to have "fun" when it means 474 battles needed for rank 1

[wot_chikor]

4 minutes ago, Xairen said:

What is fun?

I don't think i want to have "fun" when it means 474 battles needed for rank 1

ASK That moautor who plas religiously with you all the day he will tell you whatt's fun ; he surely is having alot of it . 

[XAlREN]

Nah - he had less than the half of the fun you had.

[Prospect_b]

While I somewhat understand, I guess, the "reasons" to react on @wot_chikor's original post, cause it looks somewhat trollish, or at least he could have worked on his wording, it is lame that so many people are jumping on him like a pack of hyena's, or stooping to such levels as

 

25 minutes ago, Xairen said:

Did u realy need 474 battles for rank 1 in season 10?

 

That's just my opinion of course.

[wot_chikor]

thanks for understanding 

[XAlREN]

yes

38 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

 i met her few tiems in ranked , its sad how does 2 ships in division who are so dedicated to help her for months day and night tured her into a superunicum .

thanks for understanding

[Mr_Snoww]

2 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

thanks for understanding 

do you actually think you are a good CV player? im curious if you are just having a laugh or being serious because if you are serious that would be hilarious. oh and seems as you are talking about ranked i seem to remember slapping you around in your fighter haku in ranked in my midway. after getting to rank 1 in 110 battles not 474 :)

[ghostbuster_]

37 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

i play it for fun i try all my tier10 ships , do you know whats fun or u know only winrate with monotaur ? 

here we go iplay4fun. classic

[ForlornSailor]

16 minutes ago, Saiyko said:

it is lame that so many people are jumping on him like a pack of hyena's, or stooping to such levels as

 

Well, some people just have a deep urge to show the world their true personality.

[159Hunter]

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

you are kinda right but its still unfair and WG admited that , and i dont mind having this issue once in a while but having it again and again is just alot

Source plz

[ColiaSolo]

 

[Edited]

 

 

 

[Animalul2012]

do not worry mate! they will all cry in despair when they see what arty looked like! oh yeah 5 artys per game that could one shot you, they can shot you but you can not do anything, you can not kill them if there is a lake close to them. oh yeah wows community you are horrible, you get a joy of a game while the ones from wot struggle to repair it! but no we want arty in wows! also carriers should not be allowed to platoon! tired of those tryhard midway and worcesters, minotaurs or des moines divisions. 

[ghostbuster_]

1 hour ago, wot_chikor said:

if it wass a fair fight she is not my league , not even the same post code . 

at least you are right with something. yes she cant be your league. maybe 4-5 leagues above you. its so obvious for anyone who checked stats of you both in CVs. you can farm damage really easy. but in a CV, actual indicator is WR and avrg ship kills. 

[__Helmut_Kohl__]

1 minute ago, ghostbuster_ said:

at least you are right with something. yes she cant be your league. maybe 4-5 leagues above you. its so obvious for anyone who checked stats of you both in CVs. you can farm damage really easy. but in a CV, actual indicator is WR and avrg ship kills. 

 

Enough with the collective stat-shaming already. That is not cool. 

 

There is a difference in responding to his post and making fun of him in general. 

[ghostbuster_]

On 11/26/2018 at 8:00 PM, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Enough with the collective stat-shaming already. That is not cool. 

 

There is a difference in responding to his post and making fun of him in general. 

he was the one who claimed to be far better than her. so i checked the stats. 

 

besides if this topic wasnt a pile of *edited from the beginning, i would actually take him serious and try to discuss. "t10 sealclubbers" how is it possible not to make fun of this 

[wot_chikor]

On 11/26/2018 at 8:04 PM, ghostbuster_ said:

he was the one who claimed to be far better than her. so i checked the stats. 

 

besides if this topic wasnt a pile of *edited from the beginning, i would actually take him serious and try to discuss. "t10 sealclubbers" how is it possible not to make fun of this 

i coundlt find the screenshots ( witch i shared also in a previous topic of mine ) vs her , trust me playing only with AA ships makes her skills in fighter duels very bad i used to have easy wins vs her . she will not deny it . 

the fact that she needs AA ships in the first places tells everything anyway .

 

[XAlREN]

Yes - would be unfair if i have the skill, the look, the dmg, the kills AND all the planes - don't ya think so?

[ghostbuster_]

14 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

i coundlt find the screenshots ( witch i shared also in a previous topic of mine ) vs her , trust me playing only with AA ships makes her skills in fighter duels very bad i used to have easy wins vs her . she will not deny it . 

the fact that she needs AA ships in the first places tells everything anyway .

 

Its not about needing or not. Its playing in div. If we played in div with you together and if you took CV, ofc i would take one of my full AA build ships. Would this mean that you need to have AA ships to play CV too? 

 

Like i said. Indicator for CVs is WR and arvg plane kills and at both of them she is better than you.  Thats it.

 

[El2aZeR]

9 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

witch i shared also in a previous topic of mine

 

I went through your last few topics and I couldn't find anything. Only claims of how you beat all those CV players better than you, always accompanied with "I forgot to take/can't find the screenshot". 

 

On the other hand I found plenty of screenshots of you getting trashed. Including one where you got trashed hard by some Chinese streamer playing on EU with a 100+ ping.

[El2aZeR]

7 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

look better dude , done blame me for your blindness

 

The screenshot that was removed only showed you feeding a mindboggling 50 planes to a Minotaur with some very impressive MS Paint skills attempting to remove the names.

And it was later on proven in that topic that said CV player was and still is in fact much better than you even when only comparing solo stats.

 

Meanwhile I also found an instance of you trying to pass off another much better CV player's stats as your own, which wasn't very smart considering your stats are still publicly accessible and still much worse than what you displayed.