Jump to content
moodermonster

Izumo is not T9

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
3 posts
4,201 battles

Well I am now playing the Izumo for a while, however she is not a T9 Ship. With the Izumo I have never make a citadel hit against a T9 or T10 Cruiser.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Players
1,244 posts
15,493 battles

Count yourself lucky i grinded her to Yamato. When i was playing for free , i lost credits like mad and was an average player that time with a 10 pnt cpt in it . i didnt even have CE on it.

 

Was back when cpts where 18pnts max

 

Had to play 92 games in it and sold it . When i started getting enough free xp i just bought the yamato

 

 

Havent played it now, but it sure will be an easier time than 2 years ago.. so no sympathy for u ;)

 

Anyway if u want to see troll guns get kronshtat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ADRIA]
Players
4,856 posts
6,926 battles
2 hours ago, moodermonster said:

however she is not a T9 Ship

I agree. I've always liked Izumo more than the Yamato :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG-EU]
WG Team, WoWs Wiki Team
3,499 posts
11,751 battles
Vor 5 Stunden, moodermonster sagte:

Well I am now playing the Izumo for a while, however she is not a T9 Ship. With the Izumo I have never make a citadel hit against a T9 or T10 Cruiser.

 

She is a T9 ship, but that means she needs T9 aiming skills to hit citadels ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OP-B]
Beta Tester
517 posts
3,130 battles
10 hours ago, invicta2012 said:

Isn't she getting pretty major buffs in the near future?

She already got major buffs; armour and concealment were buffed recently.

 

I had a decent time in her. It was when I got Yamato that I was dissapointed. Couldn’t hit and the dispersion was trollish in my eyes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FISHR]
Beta Tester
269 posts
8,050 battles
13 hours ago, wilkatis_LV said:

I agree. I've always liked Izumo more than the Yamato :Smile_trollface:

oh please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ADRIA]
Players
4,856 posts
6,926 battles
45 minutes ago, zappori said:

oh please.

No, really.

 

No cheek weakness on citadel. Good turret traverse allowing you to engage more than 1 target per 2 min (fixed by the latest Yamato buff). Similar, but slightly better maneuverability. These days - better concealment. Basically no superstructure to farm. 410s score less overpens than 460s. And so on and on and on...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR-S]
Players
371 posts
19,097 battles
17 hours ago, Ysterpyp said:

if u want to see troll guns get kronshtat

- or better don´t. Mikasa is cheaper and offers similar accuracy.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CATS]
Players
15,976 posts
11,212 battles
3 minutes ago, drmajga said:

- or better don´t. Mikasa is cheaper and offers similar accuracy.

Hyperbole much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
165 posts
6,999 battles

Its really not that bad currently compared to other t9 ships. I personally think the FDG is in a worse state atm. Even so I would put it down to a different play style to the amagi, but the largest factor is that you seem to be a really eh - bellow average player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×