[ARYA] Atorpad Players 427 posts 8,756 battles Report post # Posted November 1, 2018 Hi Is this bug or my mistake? Souldn't shima outspot akizuki? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 [WG-EU] Commander_Cornflakes [WG-EU] WG Team, WoWs Wiki Team 3,497 posts 11,569 battles Report post #1 Posted November 1, 2018 That comparison is bugged and does not include captain skills. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 [CATS] ColonelPete Players 15,325 posts 11,028 battles Report post #2 Posted November 2, 2018 And as many players found out in low Tier, these ship scores mean not much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 [SBS] Nautical_Metaphor Players 1,277 posts 9,701 battles Report post #3 Posted November 2, 2018 Vor 12 Stunden, Atorpad sagte: Is this bug or my mistake? Souldn't shima outspot akizuki? She does, everything being equal (same camo buff/captain skill/concealment system mod 1 mounted). And even if these "ratings" were meant to "grade on a curve", reflecting the ships' tiers ("concealment is good for tier VIII"), that should give Shimakaze a better rating because she has the best concealment on all of Tier X (afair) while Akizuki has rather poor stealth among tier VIII DDs. However, assuming the comparison function uses the same rating system as the port specs, these two specific players must be using different concealment builds in this game because the base ratings in port are not 92 vs 94 in favour of Akizuki but 88 vs 84 in favour of Shimakaze. Player must have skipped on the stealth buffs. Some of the port ratings really are bad and misleading, like AA Defense. But this one here actually does seem to be helpful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hi
Is this bug or my mistake?
Souldn't shima outspot akizuki?
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites