You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.

Poll on WG points mentioned during CV rework video
By
KarmaQU_EU, in General Discussion
Poll
154 members have voted
-
1. Do you think CVs can be fixed while retaining RTS mode?
-
Yes
-
No
-
Don't Know / Don't Care
-
Yes, but extensive changes to rest of the game will also be necessary
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
2. WG says many players have never even played a single game of CV. What is your reason for not playing CV? (Can answer even if played some CV before)
-
Too busy grinding rest of ships
-
Afraid of failing / Too difficult
-
Don't like CVs' real life concept
-
Don't like how CVs are shown in game
-
Changes made by WG to CVs over the past years
-
CVs get a bad reputation on forums and in-game
-
Too weak compared to other ships
-
Not Fun in game / Gameplay is bad
-
No guidance /manual/ explanation
-
Other
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
3. Should more players actually be playing CV? Do we really need more players to be playing CV?
-
Yes
-
No
-
Neutral / Undecided
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
4. Do you like RTS genre? Is good RTS appealing to you?
-
Yes, better than WoWs
-
Yes, but only for World War games
-
Yes, but not substantially more than everything else, this includes WoWs
-
No, WoWs is best and perfect and only (even after comparing to other games)
-
No, but there are other genres that are my favourite
-
No, but I haven't played that much RTS to begin with (or a lot of other games, to be fair) (uninformed / neutral / don't care)
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
5. What would you prefer CV gameplay to be?
-
RTS
-
WG solution
-
Other
-
In fact Rest of the game should revolve around RTS (and also have more depth, amongst other things)
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
6. What do you think is current CV's biggest problem?
-
Skillgap
-
Depth (in both meaning and gameplay)
-
Controls and UI
-
Integration with Surface Combat gameplay
-
Asset quality and accuracy
-
Rewards and Fun
-
Utility and Capability balance in-game
-
Player Agency, Atmosphere, Immersion, philosophy, etc.
-
Other
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
7. Do you think the original RTS mode of CV was badly designed?
-
Yes, many flaws, WG didn't help either
-
Yes, but only in hindsight and by player exploitation
-
No, but it simply didn't fit with the game
-
No, and in fact it was superior to the rest of the game
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
8. Which aspects below will most assure the quality of the new CV design? (pick the ones most meaningful to you)?
-
Teamwork
-
Immersion
-
Cinematics and visuals
-
Ease of use
-
Fairness, Fun and Positivity
-
Depth of gameplay, intellect, and strategy
-
Slapstick and youtube-worthiness
-
Reputation
-
Interaction with AA / Fighter mechanics
-
Damage mechanics (both to ships and to planes)
-
BCVs / Other Hybrid Carriers
-
Other
-
This question is unimportant
-
-
9. What should WG do to "help them greatly" improve the quality of this CV rework?
-
Posted in comments.
-
God help them.
-
86 comments in this topic