Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Zen71_sniper

Directive bug?

19 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
2,980 posts
8,609 battles

Hi all,

 

8 minutes ago, Zen71_sniper said:

Am I missing something? I didn't get any progress on this mission....

 

 

Criteria.png

Result.jpg

 

"In 2 battles, join the top 3 among both teams by experience received"

 

You were 9th... :Smile_hiding:

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
773 posts
12,265 battles

Notice that it says top 3 in base XP among both teams, so sorry but you don't qualify with that outcome: the top 3 are the red Zao, Shimakaze and Richelieu. If you've had, say, 1500+ base XP (i.e., top of your team and a battle worth being in the "carry harder!" thread) then yes.

 

Salute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,354 posts
5,816 battles

shot-18_08.26_13_59.18-0509.thumb.jpg.3e2423c30fd1e891e8812c62ce0b9ea7.jpg

48 minutes ago, Zen71_sniper said:

Is it even possible to be higher in a loosing team than in a winning team? 

 

 

Yes... sadly it is. Trust me, you wont be happy once that happens. Found one screen, which happened lately in Ranked. Not better then the Top of the winning team, but would have been enough for the mission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-T-O-]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,139 posts
5,915 battles

Reading issues... :Smile_sceptic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[OCTO]
Players
636 posts
15,176 battles
15 minutes ago, _DeathWing_ said:

Reading issues... :Smile_sceptic:

Or just refusing to believe that WG would put such a condition.... :cap_wander_2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-T-O-]
Alpha Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,139 posts
5,915 battles
4 minutes ago, Zen71_sniper said:

Or just refusing to believe that WG would put such a condition.... :cap_wander_2:

 

Well, when I read it last night (three times cuz I couldn't believe what shenanigans they made there) my face was exactly as that one you put at the end. Basically your team needs to win or you won't get it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
947 posts
13,480 battles
On 22. 09. 2018. at 10:21 AM, Zen71_sniper said:

Ah, OK - a bit ambiguous. Is it even possible to be higher in a loosing team than in a winning team? 

Oh yes mate acctually belive it or not you can score twice as much "base xp" as the top winner and still lose, its one of those "i just need to step outside for a while moments"

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
404 posts
4,777 battles
On 22/09/2018 at 9:21 AM, Zen71_sniper said:

Ah, OK - a bit ambiguous. Is it even possible to be higher in a loosing team than in a winning team? 

bPxAgSO.jpg&key=8c7931805b6b9c94a0af4201

 

Yes it is. It's also possible to be top XP in the whole match AND being in the losing team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NED]
Players
4,196 posts
11,706 battles

Almost started a topic myself until I finally read "both" teams... I thought that I finally had a decent "top X xp" mission. It used to always be top 3 winning matches. In those cases I manage to end up in place x -1 or lower on the winning side or on the top X on the losing side in 99% of the cases. But this "both sides" makes it even nastier as I see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-AP-]
Players
592 posts
2,686 battles
8 minutes ago, Ferry_25 said:

Almost started a topic myself until I finally read "both" teams... I thought that I finally had a decent "top X xp" mission. It used to always be top 3 winning matches. In those cases I manage to end up in place x -1 or lower on the winning side or on the top X on the losing side in 99% of the cases. But this "both sides" makes it even nastier as I see it.

"Both sides" essentially mean top 3 of winning side, or an absolute beast of a game on the losing side, so all in all, slightly better than top 3 of winning side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[VAR]
Players
602 posts
7,695 battles
1 hour ago, thiextar said:

"Both sides" essentially mean top 3 of winning side, or an absolute beast of a game on the losing side, so all in all, slightly better than top 3 of winning side.

Spoken like a true Baker Street boy :cap_hmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[_GG_]
Weekend Tester
261 posts
2,309 battles
On 22.9.2018 at 11:21 AM, Zen71_sniper said:

Ah, OK - a bit ambiguous. Is it even possible to be higher in a loosing team than in a winning team? 

It does quite clearly say both teams, nothing ambiguous about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×