Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
wot_chikor

Ranked season10 rant ( rank 1 )

73 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[B0TS]
Players
415 posts
10,247 battles

little disclaimer , if you get triggered easy , don't read this . and please WG don't ban me from forum for this  . 

so after some 70 battles i got to rank 5 then for some only 400 battles i managed to go from rank 5 to 1 , and i want to share the issues i faced this season .

1) OP ships , WG what i have lost so many games because of worcester's  fairy tail rainbow  and  stalingrad's stalinium AP   , these two ships need to get hit  with the nerf bat , stalin especially stalin .

2) chat ban : i get chat banned literally once in every two days , i just got chat banned because i said in chat yaaay rank 1 at last , that's it , i never insulted or misbehaved in chat and yet your *edit algorithm for chat ban is so bad please fix it .

3) RNG manipulation : i feel that some players get extra RNG in mm or in dispersion or whatever ,  i had the other in a CV game afighter duel where i had more fighters than the moron enemy cv with his 90% winrate and all his  premium ships , his 6 midway  fighters killed all my 7 fighters on top of  my gearing's AA . is that it ? the player with more premium ship wins the RNG duel ?

4) please remove the star save for losing team , i have seen people manipulating it , there wasa cv feeding planes to his friend  in enemy cruiser to let him save  his star . fking cheaters 

5) tier10s : WG  give us the ability to play tier8 or 7 at last up to rank 5 becasue as  i montioned at the start , 75% of the battles in ranked players are stuck at rank 5 to 1 

6) CVs ; at some points it came to witch of the two teams have more AA ships to determine the winner , allowing a moron below average player to win just because he has the wooster with doom AA and stalingrad with 1 min long def aa .

 

all in al was a good season , just fix the issues i spoke about .

Edited by xxTANK_Uxx
Inappropriate remarks
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 5
  • Boring 8
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[B0TS]
Players
415 posts
10,247 battles
7 minutes ago, principat121 said:

a.png.7a7dcd21cc3a3930c36689663470afdb.png

LET ME TELL YOU A JOKE thats not boring , 

do you know that the sun is not the only thing that rises up in the morning ?

  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POI--]
Players
3,879 posts
5,016 battles
4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

1) OP ships , WG what i have lost so many games because of worcester's  fairy tail rainbow  and  stalingrad's stalinium AP   , these two ships need to get hit  with the nerf bat , stalin especially stalin .

I miraculously met no Stalingrad yet. Worcester wasn't much of an issue so far. It's a strong ship, but I found it more brutal in cB, where teams coordinate better.

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

2) chat ban : i get chat banned literally once in every two days , i just got chat banned because i said in chat yaaay rank 1 at last , that's it , i never insulted or misbehaved in chat and yet your *edit algorithm for chat ban is so bad please fix it .

I have yet to get chatbanned in WoWS. Please reflect on your conduct.

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

3) RNG manipulation : i feel that some players get extra RNG in mm or in dispersion or whatever ,  i had the other in a CV game afighter duel where i had more fighters than the moron enemy cv with his 90% winrate and all his  premium ships , his 6 midway  fighters killed all my 7 fighters on top of  my gearing's AA . is that it ? the player with more premium ship wins the RNG duel ?

RNG is RNG. R stands for random. Why are you surprised when randomly statistically unlikely but possible events occur? It is very unlikely for a person to win the lottery, yet, among the many participants, some people still win. Without manipulation. Please do not buy into conspiracy theories or create them just because random is too random for you.

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

4) please remove the star save for losing team , i have seen people manipulating it , there wasa cv feeding planes to his friend  in enemy cruiser to let him save  his star . fking cheaters 

There's two threads on the system. Also, any alledged ccheating can be sent in to support with replay or whatever proof you have.

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

5) tier10s : WG  give us the ability to play tier8 or 7 at last up to rank 5 becasue as  i montioned at the start , 75% of the battles in ranked players are stuck at rank 5 to 1 

I don't see what the tier has to do with people being stuck, but I agree, variety in tiers would be nicer.

4 hours ago, wot_chikor said:

6) CVs ; at some points it came to witch of the two teams have more AA ships to determine the winner , allowing a moron below average player to win just because he has the wooster with doom AA and stalingrad with 1 min long def aa .

If your team would play sensibly and you provide cover properly, it's possible to still create a situation of parity in the air. And if you feel like it is this bad, don't play CV. But there always will be imbalances. Am I to complain about matches that are lost because enemy team gets YY or Gearing and our team gets Khaba?

 

All in all, the more valid points would likely have been conveyed in a more convincing manner, had you left out random conspiracy theories and baseless whining.

3 hours ago, principat121 said:

a.png.7a7dcd21cc3a3930c36689663470afdb.png

Dude, this isn't constructive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,208 posts
8,885 battles
1 hour ago, wot_chikor said:

please remove the star save for losing team

 

Sorry to break it to you mate, but that system is the only reason why you were able to achieve

Rank 1 @51.69% winrate.

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Modder
3,871 posts
6,942 battles
12 minutes ago, Riselotte said:

Dude, this isn't constructive.

"Constructive" would be to use one of the existing threads about Ranked Battles and all.

 

But our well known special snowflake needs his very own (superfluous) threads about this topic...

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[B0TS]
Players
415 posts
10,247 battles
2 hours ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Sorry to break it to you mate, but that system is the only reason why you were able to achieve

Rank 1 @51.69% winrate.

trust me number of battles  doesnt mean anything , i give you an exemple , yesterday only i played some 25 games  half of them in rank 2 with  4 stars  , i literally played 25 games rank 2 4 stars and rank 2 with 3 stars , win lose win lose .

it was absurde , and i think the mm is  somehow manipulated . can't prove it but i feel it .. 

 

2 hours ago, Riselotte said:

I miraculously met no Stalingrad yet. Worcester wasn't much of an issue so far. It's a strong ship, but I found it more brutal in cB, where teams coordinate better.

I have yet to get chatbanned in WoWS. Please reflect on your conduct.

RNG is RNG. R stands for random. Why are you surprised when randomly statistically unlikely but possible events occur? It is very unlikely for a person to win the lottery, yet, among the many participants, some people still win. Without manipulation. Please do not buy into conspiracy theories or create them just because random is too random for you.

There's two threads on the system. Also, any alledged ccheating can be sent in to support with replay or whatever proof you have.

I don't see what the tier has to do with people being stuck, but I agree, variety in tiers would be nicer.

If your team would play sensibly and you provide cover properly, it's possible to still create a situation of parity in the air. And if you feel like it is this bad, don't play CV. But there always will be imbalances. Am I to complain about matches that are lost because enemy team gets YY or Gearing and our team gets Khaba?

 

All in all, the more valid points would likely have been conveyed in a more convincing manner, had you left out random conspiracy theories and baseless whining.

Dude, this isn't constructive.

thnx for feedback even tho you disagree with most what i said but its okey . 

 

2 hours ago, principat121 said:

"Constructive" would be to use one of the existing threads about Ranked Battles and all.

 

But our well known special snowflake needs his very own (superfluous) threads about this topic...

you are a hater 

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,208 posts
8,885 battles
20 minutes ago, wot_chikor said:

trust me number of battles  doesnt mean anything , i give you an exemple , yesterday only i played some 25 games  half of them in rank 2 with  4 stars  , i literally played 25 games rank 2 4 stars and rank 2 with 3 stars , win lose win lose .

it was absurde , and i think the mm is  somehow manipulated . can't prove it but i feel it .. 

 

Your overall 51% this season means you would have overall needed

100 games to gain 2 stars.

 

A player with 60% would have overall needed

100 games to gain 20 stars.

 

The star-saving is the only reason why you reached R1, which is ok for me.

But it is strange that you want the system removed.

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POI--]
Players
3,879 posts
5,016 battles
4 minutes ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Your overall 51% this season means you would have overall needed

100 games to gain 2 stars.

 

A player with 60% would have overall needed

100 games to gain 20 stars.

 

The star-saving is the only reason why you reached R1, which is ok for me.

But it is strange that you want the system removed.

 

Assuming no irrevocable ranks (de facto including lowest rank). Otherwise you could actually get 50 losses straight at a rank with nothing to lose, then win 50 games for 50 stars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[B0TS]
Players
415 posts
10,247 battles
1 minute ago, thisheep said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1

sheep  i promoted you ( and some other cv mains also ) you are officially now  AVERAGE  , congratulations, how does it feel to leave the below average cv  club ? 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,208 posts
8,885 battles
3 minutes ago, Riselotte said:

Assuming no irrevocable ranks (de facto including lowest rank). Otherwise you could actually get 50 losses straight at a rank with nothing to lose, then win 50 games for 50 stars.

 

A true "competitive" Ranked would - of course - have no irrevocable ranks and no saved stars.

 

But for me a more casual system is fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,208 posts
8,885 battles
9 minutes ago, I_AM_LULU_SNAIL said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1

5 minutes ago, thisheep said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1

4 minutes ago, OhMyWaifu said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1

3 minutes ago, Tellmarch said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1&key=7819034da

2 minutes ago, Akikaze94 said:

464867196540289025.png?v=1

 

464867196540289025.png?v=1&key=7819034da

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×