Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Leo_Apollo11

Number of players playing "exotic" ships ("Missouri", "Musashi", "Nelson", "Kronshtadt", "Stalingrad", "Flint", "Black") in past week on EU and NA!

28 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
3,403 posts
9,959 battles

Hi all,

 

Number of players playing "exotic" ships ("Missouri", "Musashi", "Nelson", "Kronshtadt", "Stalingrad", "Flint", "Black") in past week on EU and NA!

 

 

According to most excellent MapleSyrup:

 

EU

http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20180901/eu_week/average_ship.html

 

NA

http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20180901/na_week/average_ship.html

 

 

There were rather few players playing "exotic" ships last week:

 

Missouri

EU: 492

NA: 561

 

Musashi

EU: 824

NA: 445

 

Nelson

EU: 165

NA: 128

 

Kronshtadt

EU: 232

NA: 136

 

Stalingrad

EU: 127

NA: 84

 

Flint

EU: 6

NA: 13

 

Black

EU: 9

NA: 12

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

 

 

P.S.

Thread on Reddit:

 

 

  • Cool 5
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
4,085 posts
7,015 battles
18 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

There were rather few players playing "exotic" ships last week:

 

Not so few if you put the numbers in perspective? Izumo 529 vs Musashi 824 f.e.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
3,403 posts
9,959 battles

Hi all,

 

2 minutes ago, Oldschool_Gaming_YT said:

Do you thing its a special reason for this or why did you start to investigate this?

 

Since there was "big scare" of possible "Stalingrad" OP "menace" I wanted to see how many of those are actually showing... :Smile_hiding:

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
1,313 posts
9,321 battles
3 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

 

Since there was "big scare" of possible "Stalingrad" OP "menace" I wanted to see how many of those are actually showing... :Smile_hiding:

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

Aah, ok. I actually only seen maybe 3 or 4 ingame total. Are there so few out and about? Because if many players own that ship they should play them a lot I think. Do we have a number on how many there is on the EU server?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,658 posts
10,306 battles
6 minutes ago, Oldschool_Gaming_YT said:

Because if many players own that ship they should play them a lot I think. Do we have a number on how many there is on the EU server?

 

I only played my Stalin a few times, same for other members of my clan.

The ship is simply not as good as some people want to believe.

To me it is not stronger than a Des Moines overall.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,378 posts
11,022 battles
Vor 30 Minuten, Leo_Apollo11 sagte:

Missouri

EU: 492

NA: 561

 

Musashi

EU: 824

NA: 445

 

Nelson

EU: 165

NA: 128

 

Kronshtadt

EU: 232

NA: 136

 

Stalingrad

EU: 127

NA: 84

 

Flint

EU: 6

NA: 13

 

Black

EU: 9

NA: 12

Just shows that american players prefer to lick their own ballz to play their own national ships and tend to avoid "enemy" ships like russian and japanese ones (see Musashi and Kronshtadt), while european players have a more variety with their ships and a more pragmatic way when choosing what to play.

Well, that goes least for those "exotic" ships. Would be interesting to have a statistic that includes all ships - premium and silver ones - to see if this trend is universal for all ships, or just for those special ones.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[H_FAN]
Players
2,131 posts
28,072 battles

I may be more than usual stupid but Mikasa 1 player 38 games , seems not so right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
5,375 posts
6,777 battles
5 minutes ago, Gnirf said:

I may be more than usual stupid but Mikasa 1 player 38 games , seems not so right?

 

Exactly the reason why i think this site stats are skewed :fish_book:

The amount between players and battles played seems to be out of proportion sometimes imo. DOesnt even look that weird now, but when the average number of battles played is very high, i start to doubt it.

There will always be players who play only a couple of matches per week per ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
3,403 posts
9,959 battles

Hi all,

 

13 minutes ago, Michey802 said:

Are those stats for randoms only? I bet a good number of players are in ranked right now

 

PvP (i.e. Random Battles) only...

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
3,403 posts
9,959 battles

Hi all,

 

BTW, using the most excellent "WoWs Numbers" stats site there is no evidence of big number of "Stalingrad" in "Ranked Season 10" either...

 

EU

 

#1

"Stalingrad" is just 1.2% of all Tier X ships used:

 

https://wows-numbers.com/season/id,10/

 

 

#2

There are just 249 players with more than 20 battles in "Stalingrad":

 

https://wows-numbers.com/season/ship/ranking/id,10,3760109008,Stalingrad/?order=battles__desc&p=3

 

 

NA

 

#1

"Stalingrad" is just 1% of all Tier X ships used:

 

https://na.wows-numbers.com/season/id,10/

 

 

#2

There are just 98 players with more than 20 battles in "Stalingrad":

 

https://na.wows-numbers.com/season/ship/ranking/id,10,3760109008,Stalingrad/?order=battles__desc&p=2

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
1,152 posts
6,228 battles

I play Mushi from time to time. It is a good credit earner with all the money camos and flags plus it is a nice looking ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
1,305 posts
2,862 battles
3 hours ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

 

Since there was "big scare" of possible "Stalingrad" OP "menace" I wanted to see how many of those are actually showing... :Smile_hiding:

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

Not many battles but definetly appearing OP

 

https://wows-numbers.com/ship/3760109008,Stalingrad/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HOO]
Players
1,305 posts
2,862 battles
16 hours ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Sorry, but the average Stalingrad owner is simply that much better. 

That's the point though isn't it. WG have given a ship which they say is very situational, but has BB guns on a cruiser with Russian rail gun arc and velocity. too the very best players in the game. They are exactly the people who know how to get the very best from the ship, so making it so 'stronk' in the first place only makes it worse for everyone that has to face them.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLAST]
[BLAST]
Players
705 posts
11,138 battles

@Leo_Apollo11

Do you know much about how this site collects its data and how comprehensive it is?

Keeping a comprehensive data set up to date is an intensive process. I'm not even sure that WG's API servers could supply the data fast enough to make comprehensive weekly data reliable. I would consider it indicative at best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SICK]
Weekend Tester
4,761 posts
9,392 battles
16 hours ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Sorry, but the average Stalingrad owner is simply that much better. 

Then you look at the top 5% of players are see the same inconsistencies. 

 

And guess what? The top 5% Zao and DM players tend to also be the top 5% Stalingrad players. 

How do you explain that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×