Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
__Helmut_Kohl__

CV Rework Discussion

13,828 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[SCRUB]
Players
5,763 posts
16,940 battles
16 minutes ago, Darth_Glorious said:

low speed of the planes

Actually they are hilariously fast - but tbh, if striking is all there is to do, then it'll become boring quickly, yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,412 posts
7,888 battles

What does the "Fire air defense" symbol mean? I was trying to work out if it was your planes spotted by enemy planes (doesn't seem to be), or if you were being attacked by AA (doesn't seem to be that either)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,938 posts
23,206 battles
On 15/10/2018 at 7:37 PM, BrigadierRosen said:

can't wait for russian CV's

 

this will be their theme when they entre the game at max volume.

 

 

Enter theme.

  Hide contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top marx for content. But you are putin Russia on a pedestal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,274 battles
Just now, Major_Damage225 said:

No more stealth BB's, this gonna be gewd :Smile_playing:

Please restrain your enthusiasm, a 4% reduction does not constitute a large difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TORAZ]
Beta Tester
15,786 posts
26,801 battles
23 minutes ago, Xevious_Red said:

That can always be adjusted later though, drop plane HP and more die if you just fly though flak.

 

I know, I'm just staring in horror because my inner Touhou player is appalled at the lack of dodging.

And well, that the damage is too high should've been obvious from just looking at the values to anyone who has some experience with the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[STOMP]
Players
157 posts
18,973 battles
47 minutes ago, OVanBruce said:

Tier VI Ryuujou gameplay vid

 

 

I feel that to do damage and be useful it will be really difficult, it's my first impression when i see that video ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,875 posts
7,295 battles
1 minute ago, Aragathor said:

Please restrain your enthusiasm, a 4% reduction does not constitute a large difference.

It may be small % but for a Cruiser those 4% can mean "peek a boom" or "ok, time to reposition" :Smile_Default:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles
Just now, El2aZeR said:

I know, I'm just staring in horror because my inner Touhou player is appalled at the lack of dodging.

They are appealing to the Azur Lane audience :cap_like:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,412 posts
7,888 battles
1 minute ago, Major_Damage225 said:

It may be small % but for a Cruiser those 4% can mean "peek a boom" or "ok, time to reposition" :Smile_Default:

Cruisers no longer get 12% as well. Which makes the worcester radar range nerf more pronounced if there's also a CE nerf

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,875 posts
7,295 battles
1 minute ago, Xevious_Red said:

Cruisers no longer get 12% as well. Which makes the worcester radar range nerf more pronounced if there's also a CE nerf

Yeah your right, hmm come to think of it looks like a DD buff to me, since theyr % remains the same. :cap_yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BYOB]
Players
7,047 posts
32,274 battles
3 minutes ago, Xevious_Red said:

Cruisers no longer get 12% as well. Which makes the worcester radar range nerf more pronounced if there's also a CE nerf

C0ckbote will have almost 1km of detection outside radar with those changes. Time enough for a DD to turn around and mind its business elsewhere.

The nerf will hit cruisers with bad concealment hard. Might take the legendary module out of my hinden because of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,938 posts
23,206 battles
6 hours ago, Aragathor said:

I own CVs of both lines and haven't received any invites. But I'm pretty certain WG doesn't like me.

Wear that as a badge of honour mate!  :Smile_honoring:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,875 posts
7,295 battles
Just now, Aragathor said:

C0ckbote will have almost 1km of detection outside radar with those changes. Time enough for a DD to turn around and mind its business elsewhere.

The nerf will hit cruisers with bad concealment hard. Might take the legendary module out of my hinden because of that.

Ruski Cruisers take the biggest hit then, Moskva, Kronny ans Stalin(though in this case im sure noone will complain) 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
3,938 posts
23,206 battles
5 hours ago, OVanBruce said:

Dunno if you actually were around back when the game just launched and how I was one of the harshest and most bad mouthed WG critics in this forum, to the point that I was permabanned for a year. I still am a very harsh critic of WG just a lot less bad mouthed.

Remember? I was President of your (Unofficial) Fan Club!  :Smile_honoring:

(Though I was too shy to declare my devotion in public.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,543 posts
16,031 battles
13 minutes ago, Admiral_H_Nelson said:

Remember? I was President of your (Unofficial) Fan Club!  :Smile_honoring:

(Though I was too shy to declare my devotion in public.)

To be fair I should have moderated myself more back then because I wasn't being as constructive as I should have been but it was at that moment that the game might have been saved from the dumbing down trend WG was pushing for. I'll give my feedback for this carrier rework, try to not make it as braindead as it is turning out to be and most probably fail again because the level of the playerbase is so low that even the devs recognize they are too dumb to understand current RTS carrier gameplay.

 

Anyway, cheers :Smile_honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×