Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
__Helmut_Kohl__

CV Rework Discussion

9,786 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,113 posts
6,373 battles

I'm highly interested. There's going to be butthurt rage regardless.

Take your pick:

-Dumbed down, plays like arty/battleship "OMG ruined carriers"

-Tweaked UI "OMG not a rework nothing has changed"

-Just as good as they are now but with a different camera angle "OMG carriers still OP and broken"

  • Funny 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
560 posts
1,419 battles
3 minutes ago, Xevious_Red said:

I'm highly interested. There's going to be butthurt rage regardless.

Take your pick:

-Dumbed down, plays like arty/battleship "OMG ruined carriers"

-Tweaked UI "OMG not a rework nothing has changed"

-Just as good as they are now but with a different camera angle "OMG carriers still OP and broken"

Knowing what happened with Graf, t4-5 cvs and BB citadels, 1st is very likely.

 Improved UI with better handling and controls would certainly be very good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,259 posts
7,321 battles

"The source is a post from a WoWs forum or Reddit:

 

Someone in testing decided to share where it is with me. WG has been jerking our chain on this for too long and scrubbing the Gamescom demo was the last straw. I’m sure it can’t be traced back to this person who shared it, so here’s what i can tell you:

 

Any kind of RTS game-play is 100% gone. GONE
You control ONE squadron at a time. The look is SIMILAR to Z-key control of squadrons now but not the way it controls. Play style, it is similar to playing a very fast destroyer in the sky. Squadrons have their own consumables like regular ships do, including a few that you could guess re: speed and concealment. It’s much closer to conventional WOWS ship play but much faster/twitchy. Still, nothing like the skill ceiling of current CV gameplay that resembled professional Korean Starcraft oath 400 APM, etc. Obviously this is going to screw up a lot of premiums so you willl be getting options for money back. Unfortunately, the source is a little too paranoid to let me share screen shots but you can probably imagine it."

 

Source: https://www.mmowg.net/world-of-warships-new-carrier-mode-shitload/

 

If this is true I would ask for a refund (in real money, not doublouns!) and quit the game. *edit

Also... 400 APM? I barely must be doing like 30 apm or so, perhaps less.

Edited by Rvirgo
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,113 posts
6,373 battles
1 minute ago, howardxu_23 said:

Knowing what happened with Graf, t4-5 cvs and BB citadels, 1st is very likely.

 Improved UI with better handling and controls would certainly be very good.

It's what I expect. They've already said stuff about only 1 squad at a time, and about making it feel the same as the other classes. 

They also need it to appeal to all the people that have no interest in playing RTS. This means the people that enjoy the current RTS will get the short end of the stick. Some will come to enjoy the new mode. Others will scream bloody murder about the game being ruined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
Players
4,461 posts
7,971 battles
4 minutes ago, Sargento_YO said:

"The source is a post from a WoWs forum or Reddit:

 

Someone in testing decided to share where it is with me. WG has been jerking our chain on this for too long and scrubbing the Gamescom demo was the last straw. I’m sure it can’t be traced back to this person who shared it, so here’s what i can tell you:

 

Any kind of RTS game-play is 100% gone. GONE
You control ONE squadron at a time. The look is SIMILAR to Z-key control of squadrons now but not the way it controls. Play style, it is similar to playing a very fast destroyer in the sky. Squadrons have their own consumables like regular ships do, including a few that you could guess re: speed and concealment. It’s much closer to conventional WOWS ship play but much faster/twitchy. Still, nothing like the skill ceiling of current CV gameplay that resembled professional Korean Starcraft oath 400 APM, etc. Obviously this is going to screw up a lot of premiums so you willl be getting options for money back. Unfortunately, the source is a little too paranoid to let me share screen shots but you can probably imagine it."

 

Source: https://www.mmowg.net/world-of-warships-new-carrier-mode-shitload/

I guess we'll see whether that has any substance to it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[COMFY]
Players
560 posts
1,419 battles

On the other hand, manual AA guns? As in actual manual AA, you have to physically control them, and have to make decisions on wheather to show more side to bring more AA guns to bear or something.

 

also not sure now how the Wooster will work now(it does have dual purpose for its main guns)

 

well, gonna wait till 4pm here and see what is their solution I suppose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,838 posts
10,601 battles
18 minutes ago, Tyrendian89 said:

URL guy is back in business I see... nice one :Smile_teethhappy:

 

#1

Some people would not notice it in time, since they don't check the main page regularly enough. 

 

#2

We need a thread for early reactions. 

 

#3

You must be fun at parties. 

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POMF]
Beta Tester
1,984 posts
4,035 battles

At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the countdown on stream reached 0 and it started playing this

 

 

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
Players
4,461 posts
7,971 battles
Just now, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

#1

Some people would not notice it in time, since they don't check the main page regularly enough. 

 

#2

We beed a thread for early reactions. 

 

#3

You must be fun at parties. 

wut? no, that's not what I meant. I was commenting on WG's very own URL guy, the dude that puts the endless puns in there to make us chuckle/facepalm... chillax :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PARAZ]
Beta Tester
10,798 posts
16,210 battles

Consumables on aircraft?

Remember when I talked about air mounted radar as a joke once?

I'm so sorry.

 

Also 400 APM? If I try I can maybe get 100 and that's only because I'm usually also playing KC, AL and GF in the background.

That's right, CV play is so undemanding that I can play 3 other games in the background without performance loss.

 

The current CV UI only registers about 2 in 5 commands anyway if you aim to reach high APM so it's physically impossible to utilize it anyway.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NIKE]
Beta Tester
3,113 posts
6,373 battles
5 minutes ago, howardxu_23 said:

On the other hand, manual AA guns? As in actual manual AA, you have to physically control them, and have to make decisions on wheather to show more side to bring more AA guns to bear or something.

 

also not sure now how the Wooster will work now(it does have dual purpose for its main guns)

 

well, gonna wait till 4pm here and see what is their solution I suppose.

Well I'm stuck in work till an hour after it starts, and while I can get away with checking the forum on a coffee break I probably can't watch an hour of twitch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,838 posts
10,601 battles
4 minutes ago, Tyrendian89 said:

wut? no, that's not what I meant. I was commenting on WG's very own URL guy, the dude that puts the endless puns in there to make us chuckle/facepalm... chillax :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Oh, I never looked at these URLs close enough... :Smile_teethhappy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
2,838 posts
10,601 battles
2 minutes ago, El2aZeR said:

Consumables on aircraft?

Remember when I talked about air mounted radar as a joke once?

I'm so sorry.

 

I think we will see air-dropped smoke-screens.

 

Maybe even a counter to AA, since you only got 1 squadron under your control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TTT]
Players
4,461 posts
7,971 battles
1 minute ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

Oh, I never looked at these URLs close enough... :Smile_teethhappy:

I've made a habit of looking at them, usually worth it :Smile_Default:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
101 posts
1,274 battles
1 minute ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

 

I think we will see air-dropped smoke-screens.

...

Crop-dusting caps!!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[POMF]
Beta Tester
1,984 posts
4,035 battles

Oh no, is this going to break all my animu commander voices for CV?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PARAZ]
Beta Tester
10,798 posts
16,210 battles
8 minutes ago, __Helmut_Kohl__ said:

I think we will see air-dropped smoke-screens.

 

Honestly we'll only need to check which consumables won't make sense, anything else is pretty much a given.

Which so far is hydro. Which in turn can be mounted on the CV so everything goes. *cough* GZ *cough*

 

Brilliant move by WG btw. This way they can keep introducing gimmicks for "diversity" to pump out new lines and premiums.

 

5 minutes ago, Verdius said:

Oh no, is this going to break all my animu commander voices for CV?

 

tenor.gif

 

This is the single most important aspect to me and I never even considered it before now.

:Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×