Invisi-fire

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

Seeing the game is saturated with radar which ruins the game for DD players

 

Is it not fair that invisi-fire should be returned to DD's ?

 

DD play is a shipwreck, game after game DD's are mostly getting annihilate in the first 5 minutes of battle, they cannot do the job they were designed to do

 

 

[159Hunter]

Please do, my CA will love this invisi fire option again.

[ColonelPete]

DD numbers are back to pre-patch niveau, looks like most DD players disagree with you.

[Atorpad]

Are not DDs invisi firing torps???!!

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

11 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

DD numbers are back to pre-patch niveau, looks like most DD players disagree with you.

DD numbers are a lot less, maybe new players are pushing DD numbers up in lower tier, but not at T9 and T10

 

anything to justify having radar

 

It is the most OP game changing tool in the game

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

18 minutes ago, 159Hunter said:

Please do, my CA will love this invisi fire option again.

No, just for DD's to balance it out

 

Radar OP CA/BB's

 

Invisifire  OP DD's

 

 

Fair i would say

 

 

[ColonelPete]

5 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

DD numbers are a lot less, maybe new players are pushing DD numbers up in lower tier, but not at T9 and T10

 

anything to justify having radar

 

It is the most OP game changing tool in the game

Then you should check facts and not make stuff up.

 

http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html

 

[PapVogele]

I dislike radar in its current state as much as the next guy, but no, no stealthfire...

 

we shouldn’t buff ships in order to fix radar, we shouldn’t add gimmicks in order to fix radar... just change radar a bit.

 

Try open water firing instead of trying to sneak caps and whatnot, I’ve had hillarious games in the Akizuki just blasting away in the open. Even managed to brawl a montana to death :D 

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

13 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

Then you should check facts and not make stuff up.

 

http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html

 

As i said, DD numbers have increased in lower tiers and higher tiers due to new players and clans, but at the same time;so have cruisers and battleships

 

The DD population has always be superior to CA/BB's

 

But it don't take away the fact radar is massively OP

 

So bring back invisifire for DD's

[Major_Damage225]

Despite relishing the thought of invisi fire Gremmy, Akizuki, Zao and alike..... It was a bad design, thats why it got removed, you can be certain it will never return and that's good, i'm sure many will agree. 

[ColonelPete]

6 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

As i said, DD numbers have increased in lower tiers and higher tiers due to new players and clans, but at the same time;so have cruisers and battleships

 

The DD population has always be superior to CA/BB's

 

But it don't take away the fact radar is massively OP

 

So bring back invisifire for DD's

What? Can you even read numbers? Since when is 21 bigger than 37?

And if DD numbers increase, radar does not seem to be a problem you make it out to be.

[Egoleter]

Radar discussion goes here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/103877-radar-discussion-megathread/

 

Suggestions go here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/71026-suggestions-thread/

 

Patch feedback goes here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/484-current-update/

 

Have a nice day.

[Profilus]

12 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

So bring back invisifire for DD's

Its still here for everything with main guns, just learn to use it if you think it will help you.

[Major_Damage225]

5 minutes ago, Profilus said:

Its still here for everything with main guns, just learn to use it if you think it will help you.

Pretty sure OP would like the old open water invisi fire, not the current LoS one 

[veslingr]

1 hour ago, 159Hunter said:

Please do, my CA will love this invisi fire option again.

You missed part where he said for DDs?

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

13 minutes ago, ColonelPete said:

What? Can you even read numbers? Since when is 21 bigger than 37?

And if DD numbers increase, radar does not seem to be a problem you make it out to be.

You can try and spin it all you want, but the fact is; Radar is a huge problem

 

Player base has increased, resulting in an increase for all ships, mostly at lower tier

 

You can spin it all you want

 

 

[Profilus]

3 minutes ago, Major_Damage225 said:

Pretty sure OP would like the old open water invisi fire, not the current LoS one 

Even the current invisi hangs to detect range as old one, it just happens to be equal to gunrange now.  What he would like is to spam closer so he hits more.

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

13 minutes ago, Egoleter said:

Radar discussion goes here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/103877-radar-discussion-megathread/

 

Suggestions go here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/71026-suggestions-thread/

 

Patch feedback goes here:

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/484-current-update/

 

Have a nice day.

This thread is named "Invisi-fire"

 

Its just unfortunate people turn it into a radar thread

 

 

Now lets stay on topic please

[Ze_Reckless]

First you have to prove how radar is OP.

[Profilus]

5 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

This thread is named "Invisi-fire"

 

Its just unfortunate people turn it into a radar thread

 

 

Now lets stay on topic please

Then dont mumble about radar in opening post

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

6 minutes ago, Ze_Reckless said:

First you have to prove how radar is OP.

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/103877-radar-discussion-megathread/

 

Please visit this thread

[ColonelPete]

11 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

You can try and spin it all you want, but the fact is; Radar is a huge problem

 

Player base has increased, resulting in an increase for all ships, mostly at lower tier

 

You can spin it all you want

 

 

So, you are putting your fingers in your ears go "la la la la la".

If you are not interested in facts, fine. But do not run around and claim stuff that is not true.

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

2 minutes ago, Profilus said:

Then dont mumble about radar in opening post

A mere mention of radar seems to send the CA player base into crazed zombies

 

I was merely pointing out why invisi-fire should be returned to DD's, not my fault if it turns into a radar thread

 

Now, please, can we stick to the topic

[anonym_EFwxJOPWzlER]

1 minute ago, ColonelPete said:

So, you are putting your fingers in your ears go "la la la la la".

If you are not interested in facts, fine. But do not run around and claim stuff that is not true.

Please read my replies above

[Profilus]

4 minutes ago, Kiagy said:

A mere mention of radar seems to send the CA player base into crazed zombies

 

I was merely pointing out why invisi-fire should be returned to DD's, not my fault if it turns into a radar thread

 

Now, please, can we stick to the topic

As Ze_Reckless said, you have to prove that radar is OP 1st then and this other thread doesnt prove radar is OP just as this thread wont prove we need old invisifire back.