Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

52 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[KAKE]
Players
2,804 posts
6,795 battles

Didn't we already do this topic like a week ago?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PMI]
Players
2,564 posts
9,352 battles

I dont have it handy, someone please put here Boris's seal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KAKE]
Players
2,804 posts
6,795 battles

I was wrong, it wasn't even a week.

 

 

Seriously, at least give people time to stop laughing at your old topic before reposting it.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UNICS]
Players
4,506 posts
15,942 battles
7 minutes ago, Uglesett said:

Didn't we already do this topic like a week ago?

Well, does Bismark have radar yet? So much for WG listening to the community :Smile_sceptic:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOXIC]
[TOXIC]
Players
1,135 posts
5,968 battles
1 minute ago, Movan03 said:

corrected  lets see if  WG  correct there  mistakes

 

*Corrected,

*let's

*their

 

And it's good form to end a sentence with a full stop.

  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOXIC]
[TOXIC]
Players
1,135 posts
5,968 battles
Just now, Movan03 said:

ok spell police  thats you  done  now  WG step up

 

*grammar

 

 

 

 

 

Ok, I'll stop now. :Smile_teethhappy:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KAKE]
Players
2,804 posts
6,795 battles
1 minute ago, Movan03 said:

corrected  lets see if  WG  correct there  mistakes

picard_riker_worf_facepalm.png.c527e9da9ab810f4ba79d41dee1f2c2e.png

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
7,374 posts
11,735 battles
20 minutes ago, Movan03 said:

Bismarck had  radar  assisted guns  so please correct this  mistake  and  also put radar  on scharnhorst  please  thanks.

 

I´ll give you a serious answer: We are not playing a simulator. Often, realism has to be neglected in order to balance the game. Having said that, I will not start to make list of everything, that our beloved warships had in reality - be it positive or negativ - and dont have in the game. You know why? I´d still be typing by saturday evening.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BLITZ]
Modder
6,023 posts
11,475 battles
5 minutes ago, Movan03 said:

ok spell police  thats you  done  now  WG step up

There are no double spaces between two words!

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[KLUNJ]
Players
2,870 posts
13 minutes ago, ForlornSailor said:

 

I´ll give you a serious answer: We are not playing a simulator. Often, realism has to be neglected in order to balance the game. Having said that, I will not start to make list of everything, that our beloved warships had in reality - be it positive or negativ - and dont have in the game. You know why? I´d still be typing by saturday evening.

It's just a matter of time before OP discovers that there can be more than 1 Bismark etc in a battle....some even on opposite teams. :Smile_amazed:

  • Funny 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PMI]
Players
2,564 posts
9,352 battles
9 minutes ago, bushwacker001 said:

It's just a matter of time before OP discovers that there can be more than 1 Bismark etc in a battle....some even on opposite teams. :Smile_amazed:

Channeling the OP:  WAIT WHAT!!!!!!! :cap_fainting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[BBMM]
[BBMM]
Players
8,818 posts
17,199 battles
10 minutes ago, bushwacker001 said:

It's just a matter of time before OP discovers that there can be more than 1 Bismark etc in a battle....some even on opposite teams. :Smile_amazed:

Some of them even teaming up with Britisch scrublords... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WJDE]
Beta Tester
555 posts
8,741 battles

Can we give OP a "tour" on bismarck? And leave him inside? Afaik there's no internet there, so that hopefully will stop him from making more of these threads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-MNG-]
Players
214 posts
4,292 battles

There's an easy explanation. Bismarck's Fire Control Radars were right next to the turrets so every time the guns fired it knocked the FCS out. German wunderwaffe ship design 101.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[IRQ]
Players
2,930 posts
7,510 battles
1 hour ago, bushwacker001 said:

Bismarck had  crew  so please correct this  mistake  and  also put crew on scharnhorst  please  thanks.

Bismarck (and most other ships represented in WoWs) didn't have potato captains. Please correct this mistake, WG.

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[UTW]
Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters
8,985 posts
7,359 battles

I disagree, some of the ships clearly HAD potato captains. Or at least potato crew. See William D. Porter. Or Mogami and her tendency to give a "warm hug" to allied vessels.

 

As for radar, dude, not happening. Or give them to every single ships in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×