Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Movan03

scharnhorst

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

[TAOWS]
Players
36 posts
4,748 battles

It seems that the  scharnhorst had  radar so i will expect  wargaming to correct this  mistake  asap  please.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ONE2]
Players
3,024 posts
18,637 battles

By end of WW2 every single ship from DD to CV had radar. So by that logic all them should have it then. :Smile_Default:But what would be the point? :cap_hmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TKBS]
[TKBS]
Alpha Tester
956 posts
9,584 battles
2 minutes ago, Movan03 said:

It seems that the  scharnhorse had  radar so i will expect  wargaming to correct this  mistake  asap  please.

Yes, and then give it also nuclear warheads

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TPF-]
Players
2,808 posts
12,323 battles

It's a great idea, as long as radar is a module that can be damaged during battle. That was what happened to Scharnhorst, after all. 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
Beta Tester
1,508 posts
9,960 battles
3 minutes ago, Movan03 said:

It seems that the  scharnhorse had  radar so i will expect  wargaming to correct this  mistake  asap  please.

Its not a warship simulator game, go play something else if you want historically correctness.

  • Bad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-TPF-]
Players
2,808 posts
12,323 battles

It's not a simulator , but the designers should certainly be looking at how actual naval battles went and how the role of tech was decisive. At the Battle of North Cape, poor old Scharnhorst was playing an Ocean map in a cyclone against six radar ships. Not fun and engaging for them. Ditto the IJN at Surigao Strait : Fuso vs Cleveland in a night battle. Radar FTW. Most players want a balanced match, not these one sided engagements. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ONE2]
Players
3,024 posts
18,637 battles
1 hour ago, invicta2012 said:

.... Most players want a balanced match, not these one sided engagements. ..

Yeah, I'll second that motion. Just had a fun and engaging match last Thursday methinks. Where I, rather inconveniently, got the infamous: "You are our last hope."-notification while playing Mogami in a tier 10 match on the "Islands of Ice" map. AFTER just 6m13s. of gameplay!!! WTF?:cap_wander_2:

 

Unsurprisingly, we did not exactly win that one... Mainly because I somehow failed to sink the remaining 10 enemy ships.  :Smile_facepalm:

  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[JRM]
Players
3,972 posts
20,315 battles

I vote for sharn to get her german hydro with say 5,5 km range, a buff to sec range so it is Like 9,5 ish km  and that new main armaments speed loader consumable :Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TR]
Players
1,172 posts
36,002 battles
Just now, Yedwy said:

I vote for sharn to get her german hydro with say 5,5 km range, a buff to sec range so it is Like 9,5 ish km  and that new main armaments speed loader consumable :Smile_hiding:

If you put the special German commander that has improved "Vigilance" skill you will get somewhat short range hydro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
917 posts
11,130 battles

Hm. I'm not yet certain this does worth a glass of beer just yet but maybe a popcorn is a sensible level of choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester, Players
638 posts
12,798 battles

The only thing the scharnhorst needs is better spread or chance of fuse

 

 

mang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
4,872 posts
18,028 battles
11 minutes ago, Riselotte said:

With every passing day, I miss the option of a facepalm reaction more. Because this isn't cool, boring, funny or angering, just... dunno, sad?

:Smile_facepalm::Smile_facepalm::Smile_facepalm: you mean like this.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Moderator
2,632 posts
8,312 battles
1 hour ago, RAHJAILARI said:

Unsurprisingly, we did not exactly win that one... Mainly because I somehow failed to sink the remaining 10 enemy ships.

It seems more like an issue of L2P...

Have you tried L2P?

you should L2P...

 

/s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ONE2]
Players
3,024 posts
18,637 battles
10 minutes ago, Excavatus said:

It seems more like an issue of L2P...

Have you tried L2P?

you should L2P...

NAH!:Smile_amazed: You apostate! How dare you even suggest such a horrible thing?:Smile_ohmy:

Way too much trouble and possibly no beer so I can't really be bothered...:Smile_bajan2::Smile_Default:

no.jpg.e7b12c9d5ec230514d3d35c8ba076f79.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THESO]
[THESO]
Moderator
2,632 posts
8,312 battles
6 minutes ago, RAHJAILARI said:

NAH!:Smile_amazed: You apostate! How dare you even suggest such a horrible thing?:Smile_ohmy:

Way too much trouble and possibly no beer so I can't really be bothered...:Smile_bajan2::Smile_Default:

Next time when you were against 1 vs 10..

try to change sides.. :)

offer them some drinks..

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[ONE2]
Players
3,024 posts
18,637 battles
5 minutes ago, Excavatus said:

Next time when you were against 1 vs 10..

try to change sides.. :)

offer them some drinks..

Yyyeah, I wanted to... But the Meanies just shot at me anyway. So unfair... :Smile_sad::Smile_sceptic::Smile_teethhappy:

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×