[KITEN] remenberMYname Players 653 posts 22,776 battles Report post #1 Posted July 12, 2018 pls give me historical info that this ship destroyed all aircraft in range 4 km (in quick time) + her gun makes not visibile traces. i am waiting. when..nothing...then pls, think before when developing ship and putting here! 4 6 6 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #2 Posted July 12, 2018 That is why you are a bad CV player. Do not put your planes there. Is that really that difficult? 4 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] 159Hunter Players 4,528 posts Report post #3 Posted July 12, 2018 Game choices and balance =/= history I believe this has been pointed out to you before. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Snoww Players 865 posts 23,320 battles Report post #4 Posted July 12, 2018 You do know it's spelled Worcester right? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[PUPSI] Klopirat Freibeuter 15,160 posts Report post #5 Posted July 12, 2018 Vor 13 Minuten, ColonelPete sagte: Is that really that difficult? I guess you know his flood of (nearly daily) complaints about non existing "issues", so what do you expect? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SHAFT] TBNRtom Players 120 posts 17,651 battles Report post #6 Posted July 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Milan_G_ said: pls give me historical info that this ship destroyed all aircraft in range 4 km (in quick time) + her gun makes not visibile traces. i am waiting. when..nothing...then pls, think before when developing ship and putting here! This is an arcade not a realistic game.. And please just don't put your planes next to a Worcester. Good Morning chaps! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TOXIC] eliastion Players 4,795 posts 12,260 battles Report post #7 Posted July 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Milan_G_ said: pls give me historical info that this ship destroyed all aircraft in range 4 km (in quick time) + her gun makes not visibile traces. i am waiting. when..nothing...then pls, think before when developing ship and putting here! Rooster's AA is indeed ridiculous. But so are your cries about "historical info" regarding a game balance issue. If you want to complain about ship's AA being too overwhelming, complain about that (in one of the MANY threads about high tier AA in general or Worcester in particular) but don't make a laughingstock out of yourself with that opening statement followed by a brief whinepost... is it really worth creating a thread? Oh, and also to elaborate on why asking about "historical info" is so ridiculous: if "pls give me historical info that ..." were to be treated seriously, quite a few ships would disappear (no historical info about them ever sailing the seas) and the rest would become pretty much unplayable (LOTS of crucial game mechanics are blatantly unrealistic). There are some relatively realistic naval games that struggle for historical accuracy when possible, yes. There's a reason why they are pretty niche. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #8 Posted July 12, 2018 Historically speaking all AA in this game is way too good. That's why this is a game and not history. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WGB] iJoby Community Contributor 2,171 posts 30,925 battles Report post #9 Posted July 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Milan_G_ said: pls give me historical info that this ship destroyed all aircraft in range 4 km (in quick time) + her gun makes not visibile traces. i am waiting. when..nothing...then pls, think before when developing ship and putting here! If you want realism, your bomber and torpedo planes would rarely hit their targets, "Swings n' Roundabouts" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[B0TS] ChatBanForSayingTruth Players 312 posts 15,158 battles Report post #10 Posted July 12, 2018 Historically ships were having about 3 successful hits in average out of 100 shells. Lets make it like this i game. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BONUS] Hedgehog1963 [BONUS] Beta Tester 3,211 posts 14,951 battles Report post #11 Posted July 12, 2018 3 hours ago, Mr_Snoww said: You do know it's spelled Worcester right? Imagine how he is saying it if he spells it that way... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UTW] ShinGetsu Weekend Tester, In AlfaTesters 8,985 posts 7,359 battles Report post #12 Posted July 12, 2018 It's not even true btw. I don't destroy planes at such a measly range of 4km with Worsauce. I destroy them at 8.6km. Cute 1500 DPS @ 8.6km with dAA activated. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NWP] Ubertron_X [NWP] Beta Tester 2,657 posts 25,756 battles Report post #13 Posted July 12, 2018 22 minutes ago, Hedgehog1963 said: Imagine how he is saying it if he spells it that way... Warchester, no other pronounciation thinkable or possible... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KAKE] Uglesett Players 2,804 posts 6,795 battles Report post #14 Posted July 12, 2018 4 hours ago, Milan_G_ said: pls give me historical info that this ship destroyed all aircraft in range 4 km (in quick time) Sure, just as soon as you give us historical info that naval battles in WW1-WW2 were decided in twenty minutes or less. Is only game. Why you heff to be mad? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] ClappingLollies Players 1,953 posts Report post #15 Posted July 12, 2018 15 minutes ago, Ubertron_X said: Warchester, no other pronounciation thinkable or possible... The correct way to pronounce it is: Warchestershire 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[2DSF] Arakus Beta Tester 1,541 posts 7,511 battles Report post #16 Posted July 12, 2018 First off all know the enemy ships! If there is the AA Monster you shouldn't bring your planes to close to it. Every class should know the opponents ship, an example: as DD you should know which ship has radar, planes, and fast shooting guns and what range it can be spotted helps also. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJ_Die Players 930 posts 9,329 battles Report post #17 Posted July 12, 2018 3 hours ago, El2aZeR said: Historically speaking all AA in this game is way too good. That's why this is a game and not history. Not all of it... Just look up USS Laffey.. US AA was ridiculously nasty and those 6" with radar fused VT shells... well... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #18 Posted July 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, DJ_Die said: Not all of it... Just look up USS Laffey.. US AA was ridiculously nasty and those 6" with radar fused VT shells... well... The amount of planes Laffey downed is pitiful compared to what I can get in my Gearing in this game by simply pressing one button. USN AA was murderous to be sure, but the effectiveness of ingame AA in general is still way above that. As it should be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HU-SD] Prospect_b Players 2,655 posts 14,214 battles Report post #19 Posted July 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, El2aZeR said: ingame AA in general is still way above that. for now 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HOO] Fat_Maniac [HOO] Players 2,337 posts 4,238 battles Report post #20 Posted July 12, 2018 3 hours ago, Hedgehog1963 said: Imagine how he is saying it if he spells it that way... War-chester as opposed to the correct wus-ster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KAKE] Uglesett Players 2,804 posts 6,795 battles Report post #21 Posted July 12, 2018 2 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[THESO] SV_Kompresor Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 5,868 posts Report post #22 Posted July 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, Fat_Maniac said: War-chester as opposed to the correct wus-ster Which actually sounds a lot better 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-TAP-] Pandafaust Players 755 posts 10,484 battles Report post #23 Posted July 12, 2018 20 minutes ago, Uglesett said: I am no longer going to be able to see the ship in game without calling it Bertie. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[KAKE] Uglesett Players 2,804 posts 6,795 battles Report post #24 Posted July 12, 2018 33 minutes ago, Pandafaust said: I am no longer going to be able to see the ship in game without calling it Bertie. Mission accomplished Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[HOO] BeauNidl3 Players 2,192 posts Report post #25 Posted July 12, 2018 1 hour ago, domen3 said: Which actually sounds a lot better But has no relation to the actual name of the town in the UK and the city in the US named after the town in the UK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
