[SCRUB] Leo_Apollo11 Quality Poster 7,146 posts 31,562 battles Report post #1 Posted June 6, 2018 Hi all, From Reddit: Statistics on the EU server population Leo "Apollo11" P.S. Author claims that all info is derived from WG API. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrFingers Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 3,242 posts Report post #2 Posted June 6, 2018 That long(er) term retention rate looks very shabby... Somewhat explains the ridiculous gifting of ships to dormant accounts... somewhat! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #3 Posted June 6, 2018 Great, now I feel depressed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] Leo_Apollo11 Quality Poster 7,146 posts 31,562 battles Report post #4 Posted June 6, 2018 Hi all, Also the "Winrate Histogram" looks somehow way too "perfect"... I wonder how large the sample was... Leo "Apollo11" 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-SBG-] ColonelPete Players 38,559 posts 19,178 battles Report post #5 Posted June 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Leo_Apollo11 said: Hi all, Also the "Winrate Histogram" looks somehow way too "perfect"... I wonder how large the sample was... Leo "Apollo11" Binomial distribution looks like that. With a higher cutoff and only counting solo games it might look different. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] Leo_Apollo11 Quality Poster 7,146 posts 31,562 battles Report post #6 Posted June 6, 2018 Hi all, 1 minute ago, ColonelPete said: Binomial distribution looks like that. With a higher cutoff and only counting solo games it might look different. I would say that the cutoff of at least 500-1000 games was needed instead of just 20 (and that would drastically reduce the number of eligible players)... Leo "Apollo11" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[POP] AndyHill Weekend Tester 1,433 posts Report post #7 Posted June 6, 2018 Why does the winrate start to go down with lots and lots of games played? Bots? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #8 Posted June 6, 2018 6 minutes ago, AndyHill said: Why does the winrate start to go down with lots and lots of games played? Bots? No, there are genuine people who play over several thousand battles and average around 40% WR. You see them on the boards at times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrFingers Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 3,242 posts Report post #9 Posted June 6, 2018 11 minutes ago, AndyHill said: Why does the winrate start to go down with lots and lots of games played? Bots? Way smaller sample size, thus outliers that are either extremely good or extremely bad (bots) have a more prounounced impact. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] Leo_Apollo11 Quality Poster 7,146 posts 31,562 battles Report post #10 Posted June 6, 2018 Hi all, I just asked him (and there is just one @pyalot here on EU forum - so I suppose it is the same person) on Reddit and he confirmed that he used all 3.7 million users as a sample... Leo "Apollo11" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Culiacan_Mexico Players 2,844 posts 14,993 battles Report post #11 Posted June 6, 2018 Am I reading that right 90 day retention is down to around 10%? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WCWVE] pzkpfwv1d Players 1,122 posts 20,370 battles Report post #12 Posted June 6, 2018 There are some of us no matter what we try we do who do not seem to get much above 40% win rate despite having thousands of battles played and having watched all the videos and followed all the suggestions as well, the suggestions that some people offer actually decrease the win rate rather than improve the win rate 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[NAN0] HaachamaShipping Players 8,474 posts 10,052 battles Report post #13 Posted June 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Culiacan_Mexico said: Am I reading that right 90 day retention is down to around 10%? Yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Culiacan_Mexico Players 2,844 posts 14,993 battles Report post #14 Posted June 6, 2018 Just now, Riselotte said: Yes. That would seem less than optimal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[UNICS] loppantorkel Players 4,506 posts 15,942 battles Report post #15 Posted June 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Culiacan_Mexico said: That would seem less than optimal. The game is probably too niche and would benefit from more Japanese school girls. 2 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] aboomination Players 5,763 posts 16,940 battles Report post #16 Posted June 6, 2018 18 minutes ago, pzkpfwv1d said: the suggestions that some people offer actually decrease the win rate rather than improve the win rate 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrFingers Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 3,242 posts Report post #17 Posted June 6, 2018 56 minutes ago, Culiacan_Mexico said: Am I reading that right 90 day retention is down to around 10%? Exactemundo. Wonder if a part of that comes from the absolutely atrocious pre-november2017 missions & "specials" and the shafting of the EU players compared to the other regions. Probably will have an impact. And the atrocious "-1/+2" matchmaker of T5 & T6 ships, a point where the grind starts to take a bit longer so it's not "suck it up for a few matches and grow out of it". 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[DREAD] 1MajorKoenig Players 13,110 posts 7,885 battles Report post #18 Posted June 6, 2018 Or if it comes from implementing shitty HE firing Battleships for brain dead monkeys...? If so I am guilty as well 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Culiacan_Mexico Players 2,844 posts 14,993 battles Report post #19 Posted June 6, 2018 3 minutes ago, MrFingers said: ...And the atrocious "-1/+2" matchmaker of T5 & T6 ships, a point where the grind starts to take a bit longer so it's not "suck it up for a few matches and grow out of it". I don't know if you are correct, but it is a thought that should be explored. I know many say DDs are not truly effected by being bottom tier, but in my experience tier 6 dds can be completely out classed by their tier 8 brethren. A reasonably experienced player who performs above average can get by most of the time, but for a new player of lesser skill... I think it just leads to slaughter. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrFingers Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters 3,242 posts Report post #20 Posted June 6, 2018 5 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said: Or if it comes from implementing shitty HE firing Battleships for brain dead monkeys...? It always comes as a huge surprise for the enemy that carelessly sails broadside to my Nelson "because it's a British BB, he's bound to fire HE", that my main ammo type is AP on that ship. Hilarity ensues with triple citadel devstrikes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[WCBG] BrusilovX Beta Tester 2,838 posts 23,900 battles Report post #21 Posted June 6, 2018 9 minutes ago, 1MajorKoenig said: Or if it comes from implementing shitty HE firing Battleships for brain dead monkeys...? If so I am guilty as well Not everyone shoots HE in a BB. The other day I think in my Nagato I was fighting a similar tiered USN BB and we were the last two ships afloat and their team were ahead on points. They were bow on to me and I was slightly angled firing AP into the superstructure and doing OK by it. Some helpful wag on the team (in a New York) told me to fire HE and to not show my broadside (we were still approaching each other at about 6kms at that point and I was not doing that - I was not doing so). I ignored them and continued to fire AP doing decent damage in the superstructure and it was only as we passed each other that the broadsides were exposed and I lowered my guns). I did a turn after we passed and fired into the stern of the ship and destroyed it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[SCRUB] aboomination Players 5,763 posts 16,940 battles Report post #22 Posted June 6, 2018 2 minutes ago, BrusilovX said: Not everyone shoots HE in a BB. The other day I think in my Nagato I was fighting a similar tiered USN BB and we were the last two ships afloat and their team were ahead on points. They were bow on to me and I was slightly angled firing AP into the superstructure and doing OK by it. Some helpful wag on the team (in a New York) told me to fire HE and to not show my broadside (we were still approaching each other at about 6kms at that point and I was not doing that - I was not doing so). I ignored them and continued to fire AP doing decent damage in the superstructure and it was only as we passed each other that the broadsides were exposed and I lowered my guns). I did a turn after we passed and fired into the stern of the ship and destroyed it. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TORAZ] El2aZeR Beta Tester 15,786 posts 26,801 battles Report post #23 Posted June 6, 2018 1 hour ago, loppantorkel said: The game is probably too niche and would benefit from more Japanese school girls. Nah, next collab will be about ponies. That'll surely increase interest in the game. Source: Spoiler (At 1:55) 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[P0RT] Admiral_H_Nelson Players 3,938 posts 23,206 battles Report post #24 Posted June 6, 2018 1 hour ago, MrFingers said: Exactemundo. Wonder if a part of that comes from the absolutely atrocious pre-november2017 missions & "specials" and the shafting of the EU players compared to the other regions. Probably will have an impact. And the atrocious "-1/+2" matchmaker of T5 & T6 ships, a point where the grind starts to take a bit longer so it's not "suck it up for a few matches and grow out of it". I would be VERY interested to see how many quit at tier 5/6 in the face if ..... "disheartening" . . . matchmaking. (Always supported +2/-2 but opposed the uneven frequency of being top/bottom tier) I guess that tier 8 matchmaking is also "disheartening" (to use my word of the day) - but I don't think many players quit over it. I reckon they just drop down and play ships they like at tiers below it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BYOB] Aragathor Players 7,047 posts 32,322 battles Report post #25 Posted June 6, 2018 2 hours ago, MrFingers said: Exactemundo. Wonder if a part of that comes from the absolutely atrocious pre-november2017 missions & "specials" and the shafting of the EU players compared to the other regions. Probably will have an impact. And the atrocious "-1/+2" matchmaker of T5 & T6 ships, a point where the grind starts to take a bit longer so it's not "suck it up for a few matches and grow out of it". Sprinkle that with a streak of guaranteed losses because the MM gives the opposite team all the radar and unicums, while you have dumbos running Survivability Expert on BBs. WG has no idea how to keep people playing, that's certain from those numbers. And they don't know how to fix the problems they created. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites