18% winrate-in-a-X-CV-player afking multiple times in randoms

[NicramDuel]

At first I thought it was an accident. After all, all of us have that odd disconnect during games, even CV and DD players (who are critical to the success of a game, provided there are any of them in the first place). However, the second time I saw him today, I had a bad feeling about what was coming...and indeed. All squads were sent to the righthandmost column of the map, where they were intercepted by the enemy cv, and totally erased. No more squads took off, and somehow, although it baffled my mind...he was the second to go down in the game (probably spotted by enemy CV, and nuked by pushing enemy BB's). 

 

Even if due to an accidental, coincidental disconnect/IRL emergency afk/etc, the carrierless team is nearly certainly doomed...

 

...But when there's such a player who INTENTIONALLY loses and MAKES the team lose...that's a whole different level of lameness and toxicity. Although, in this case, maximum respect+kudos to our team for keeping high heads, and an actually very happy atmosphere in chat (we actually had good laughs with some guys while having the snot kicked out of us :D ). Usually, this would result in an instant flame-war.

 

How is it even possible, under the current sanctions, for such a *edit human to even be allowed to log on, let alone continuously ruin the chances (and perhaps flag/camo/time investments) of other players?  I thought there's an ever-increasing volume of punishment towards truly afk, malicious "players". Or no? 

 

 

 

[Boris_MNE]

Yur not allowed to flame and shame me in public.

 

Ill report you for this.

[aboomination]

Name and shame him - by filing a ticket to WG support 

[SeaWolf7]

30 minutes ago, NicramDuel said:

At first I thought it was an accident. After all, all of us have that odd disconnect during games, even CV and DD players (who are critical to the success of a game, provided there are any of them in the first place). However, the second time I saw him today, I had a bad feeling about what was coming...and indeed. All squads were sent to the righthandmost column of the map, where they were intercepted by the enemy cv, and totally erased. No more squads took off, and somehow, although it baffled my mind...he was the second to go down in the game (probably spotted by enemy CV, and nuked by pushing enemy BB's). 

 

Even if due to an accidental, coincidental disconnect/IRL emergency afk/etc, the carrierless team is nearly certainly doomed...

 

...But when there's such a player who INTENTIONALLY loses and MAKES the team lose...that's a whole different level of lameness and toxicity. Although, in this case, maximum respect+kudos to our team for keeping high heads, and an actually very happy atmosphere in chat (we actually had good laughs with some guys while having the snot kicked out of us :D ). Usually, this would result in an instant flame-war.

 

How is it even possible, under the current sanctions, for such a useless waste of oxygen human to even be allowed to log on, let alone continuously ruin the chances (and perhaps flag/camo/time investments) of other players?  I thought there's an ever-increasing volume of punishment towards truly afk, malicious "players". Or no? 

 

 

 

 

 

 what the...

[Bmsrt]

He's just having fun,thats a legit "playstyle" leave him alone!(Sarcasm)

[ImperialAdmiral]

My carrier couple of days ago.

 

 

Seriously, such people should get permabans.

[G01ngToxicCommand0]

Sounds like a bot?

[Arrive_Alive]

challenge: try to get a 18% WR by afk'ing in any other class. balans 

[wilkatis_LV]

Send those screenshots (without his name covered) to support, he might get a ban. Also add the replay of the battle you played with him if you have it Of course, add description adding a short explanation of what happened, similar to what you've done here

[Exocet6951]

1 hour ago, Boris_MNE said:

Yur not allowed to flame and shame me in public.

 

Ill report you for this.

 

Pley 4 phun scrub detected !

[YuriyTheHaterTV]

Cmon guys, its just a game, calm down  

[N00Boo7]

What if the bot CV was  played by the enemy CV?if u have 2 accounts, press battle in same time, what are the chances to end up in same game with CV's??(wearring the thinfoil hat)

[Major_Damage225]

Ive seen some bad players, ive seen the special players who flame in chat at the beginning then go afk just to flame more, but this!!

How can someone see any pleasure in playing if they always loose or cant do anything.

If this dosent raise some flags to implement a quasi skill based MM, then nothing will, if you'r bellow 40% you cant go past T5.

Just my two cents here.

 

[Leo_Apollo11]

Hi all,

 

On Friday I had 12% WinRate CV Tier VII "Ranger" with average damage of 6K (after 50+ battles)... his overall WinRate (for all ships) was below 40% ...

 

We, of course, lost... it seems that there is nothing to be done with such players... you simply have to endure (and forget it ASAP)

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

[robihr]

2 hours ago, ImperialAdmiral said:

My carrier couple of days ago.

 

 

Seriously, such people should get permabans.

yeah.. those people who cant spell bye.. i agree

[RenamedUser_92906789]

smells like a multi.

[StringWitch]

2 hours ago, N00Boo7 said:

What if the bot CV was  played by the enemy CV?if u have 2 accounts, press battle in same time, what are the chances to end up in same game with CV's??(wearring the thinfoil hat)

And get all the XP from killing your alt account... clever! You can take your tinfoil off; groups of players have already been doing this in ranked, taking turns to boost each other, or even in randoms to fulfill the requirements of some of the more BS missions.

[elblancogringo]

That's actually really impressive, 18% WR is so low that it's even difficult to believe

[G01ngToxicCommand0]

1 minute ago, elblancogringo said:

That's actually really impressive, 18% WR is so low that it's even difficult to believe

It takes effort to go this low and the player in question must have done it intentionally given the number of games played as just pressing 'battle' and then disconnect or go AFK should net a winrate above 40%

[SeaWolf7]

2 hours ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

On Friday I had 12% WinRate CV Tier VII "Ranger" with average damage of 6K (after 50+ battles)... his overall WinRate (for all ships) was below 40% ...

 

We, of course, lost... it seems that there is nothing to be done with such players... you simply have to endure (and forget it ASAP)

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

 

[CptBarney]

He should be in the guiness book of world records.

 

 

[morgoroth]

Meh he spent more money on this game then I did WeeGee won't do crap.

[Hades_warrior]

9 hours ago, ImperialAdmiral said:

My carrier couple of days ago.

 

 

Seriously, such people should get permabans.

This situation reminds me on my game yesterday, when some Akizuki said in the chat how he dont like MM so he is quiting. And he left in first minute of battle...

[Hades_warrior]

6 hours ago, Leo_Apollo11 said:

Hi all,

 

On Friday I had 12% WinRate CV Tier VII "Ranger" with average damage of 6K (after 50+ battles)... his overall WinRate (for all ships) was below 40% ...

 

We, of course, lost... it seems that there is nothing to be done with such players... you simply have to endure (and forget it ASAP)

 

 

Leo "Apollo11"

This is so true.

No matter how good me and my division try to play, and when it looks like we wining (caps taken and 2-3 enemys dead in the start) we manage to lose nearly every battle in last few days.

The level of noobs is extremely high.

Today I told some Hinden in and Bismarck 1-2 squares behind me inside our A cap to support me while I was chasing enemy DD in front of me on 7 km range, they simply says ''no''...

[eliastion]

9 hours ago, N00Boo7 said:

What if the bot CV was  played by the enemy CV?if u have 2 accounts, press battle in same time, what are the chances to end up in same game with CV's??(wearring the thinfoil hat)

The saddest thing is that with our current CV population this would be perfectly doable (at high tier outside peak hours) with near-perfect success rate.