jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #1 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) Hi This is my opinion of a scandinavian tech tree which should be in World of Warships for many reasons. The Royal Danish Navy has been around almost since the start of naval combat, and has always been a nation you want avoid when it comes to naval combat. Except at the first world war and the second world war. Which is a bit onfortunate for the Tech Tree :/ The Royal Swedish Navy and The Royal Norwegian Navy have also been around for a long time. So for me it only seems fair that these superpowers in naval history, get a spot in World of Warships. I don't really know how to rate them, so many might be wrong listed, but here's my version. Feel free to comment on their ratings and adding new ships, or just commenting about other things, and keep it positive Ships that don't fit into the Tech trees, maybe premiums, could be: Ilmarinen. A finnish Coastal defence ship, which probably would be listed as a Battleship. HMS Sverige. A swedish Coastal defence ship, which probably also would be listed as a Battleship. Both of them had a lot of firepower and were built to match the new warships of their opponents. The famous Cruiser HMS Gotland. This swedish cruiser is probably more famous for it weird design and being more of a recon ship. It carried 6 recon planes (capacity for 8). Crusiers I HDMS Absalon (Denmark) II HDMS Heimdal (Denmark) III HSwMS Fylgia (Sweden) IV HMS Oscar II (Sweden) V HDMS Valkyria (Denmark) VI HDMS Niels Iuel (Denmark) VII HMS Tre Kronor (Sweden) VIII None IX None X None Destroyers II HNoMS Sleipner (Norway) III HNoMS Bath (Norway) IV HMS Klas Horn (Sweden V HDMS Huitfeldt (Denmark) VI HNoMS Stord (Norway) VII HMS Öland (Sweden) VIII None IX None X HMS Halland (Sweden) Edited April 9, 2015 by jfkennedy2 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[-DFD-] Psychological_Warfare [-DFD-] Alpha Tester 784 posts 17,553 battles Report post #2 Posted April 7, 2015 It might be helpful to link pictures and wikipedia entries or stuff like that ;) 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #3 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) [edited]. Didn't think about that, hang on, how do you do that? Edited April 7, 2015 by BigBadVuk This post has been edited by a member of the Moderation Team, due to inappropriate content. An official notification has also been sent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[RUMR] RandyWookie Beta Tester 131 posts 10,373 battles Report post #4 Posted April 7, 2015 HMS Sverige: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSwMS_Sverige Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red_warning Beta Tester 47 posts 1,453 battles Report post #5 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) I've worked on a Swedish tree for a little while (link is here, mind you it's work in progress) and to my knowledge Sweden has never operated a ship called "Barthélemy". Edit: And several of your destroyers seem to be submarines, and your Danish tier I is a modern support ship, HMS Valkyria is a steam corvette. Edited April 7, 2015 by Red_warning Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Historynerd Beta Tester 4,249 posts 848 battles Report post #6 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) Another thread opened just like that, without looking back to see if someone else had done something similar... Does someone else know about the search feature of the forum? Edited April 7, 2015 by Historynerd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #7 Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) I've worked on a Swedish tree for a little while (link is here, mind you it's work in progress) and to my knowledge Sweden has never operated a ship called "Barthélemy". Edit: And several of your destroyers seem to be submarines, and your Danish tier I is a modern support ship, HMS Valkyria is a steam corvette. Hi. The new HDMS Absalon support ship is not the right one The one i'm talking about had 2 12 cm cannons and some weak secondary battery. The ST Barthélemy was part of the Colony class cruisers. They were all prototypes laid down in 1941, i'll edit the first post to give you more information about it. As for the submarines, i see that a submarine is called Sjöormen, but it's not the same. I can't find much info about her on the internet. It was build with 5 sister ships (Sjölejonet, Sjöhunden, Sjöbjörnen, Sjöhästen and Sjöhäxan) in the period of 1930-1934 The danish Valkyrien was a cruiser-corvette, and the swedish one was an armoured cruiser. I will edit the first post to clear things up Edited April 9, 2015 by jfkennedy2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orkel2 Alpha Tester 385 posts Report post #8 Posted April 7, 2015 Don't forget the Finnish armored ship Ilmarinen with its 254mm guns: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_coastal_defence_ship_Ilmarinen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #9 Posted April 7, 2015 Don't forget the Finnish armored ship Ilmarinen with its 254mm guns: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_coastal_defence_ship_Ilmarinen It is listed just above HMS Sverige Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eyeless_Camper Alpha Tester 62 posts 59 battles Report post #10 Posted April 9, 2015 Sorry to burst your bubble here jfkennedy2. The ships from warships1discussionboards.yuku.com you listed are all fictional made by a guy named Psilander. Link to post #1">#1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj_mackman Players 6 posts 1,072 battles Report post #11 Posted April 9, 2015 (edited) Destroyer Remus and Romulus http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Romulus And why not cruiser Gotland (1933) with 8 Aircraft but still have a lot of firepower. It was her that first spotted Bismarck and prinz Eugen on their way to Norway, that they reported to England. http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Gotland Edited April 9, 2015 by dj_mackman Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anonym_DgAWWx6gxhn9 Players 2 posts Report post #12 Posted April 9, 2015 It's a great idea tho Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #13 Posted April 9, 2015 Sorry to burst your bubble here jfkennedy2. The ships from warships1discussionboards.yuku.com you listed are all fictional made by a guy named Psilander. Link to post #1">#1 Well that is one hell of a fantasy if you ask me. He got me convinsed that they were real. Although i found it weird that there was no info about it on the internet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfkennedy2 ∞ Beta Tester 12 posts 2,086 battles Report post #14 Posted April 9, 2015 Destroyer Remus and Romulus http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Romulus And why not cruiser Gotland (1933) with 8 Aircraft but still have a lot of firepower. It was her that first spotted Bismarck and prinz Eugen on their way to Norway, that they reported to England. http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Gotland Hi. The HMS Gotland is already there under the premiums And what tier do you believe that Remus and Romulus belong to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eyeless_Camper Alpha Tester 62 posts 59 battles Report post #15 Posted April 9, 2015 Well, there are people with hobbies to make up fictional ships, i've done a few myself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BEAST] Necro_von_Cortex Players 43 posts 6,727 battles Report post #16 Posted March 24, 2019 Over the last couple of weeks I have been researching the DK navy in fine detail and writen a 17 pages project about it. Most of it are just DK vessels converted to WoW standards, the add-ons are from page 4 to 17 which are 12 vessels and stats as well as the main sources. Ignore the mines as they are not an active feature of the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TTTX] Tyrendian89 [TTTX] Players 4,608 posts 8,139 battles Report post #17 Posted March 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, Necro_von_Cortex said: Over the last couple of weeks I have been researching the DK navy in fine detail and writen a 17 pages project about it. Most of it are just DK vessels converted to WoW standards, the add-ons are from page 4 to 17 which are 16 vessels and stats as well as the main sources. I mean, thumbs up for effort, but... holy smokes did you live up to the first part of your name there 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
antean Players 853 posts 907 battles Report post #18 Posted March 24, 2019 On 4/6/2015 at 8:19 PM, jfkennedy2 said: I don't really know how to rate them, so many might be wrong listed Good effort, jfkennedy2, but your 'ratings' are illogical. I did not read about all the ships you link, however, I did look at your T2 & T3 DD suggestions. What!? A 1934 build for T2? A 1940 UK build for T3? What!? I'm sure Scandinavia (Den, Fin*, Nor* & Swe) had ships more in line with pre WW1, WW1 & post WW1/pre WW2 that the main tech tree lines have. You need to do more research into the early modern time period for these nations, imho. * Fin & Nor, perhaps, would have to be represented by Ru & Swe ships for low tiers 1, 2 & 3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[BEAST] Necro_von_Cortex Players 43 posts 6,727 battles Report post #19 Posted March 24, 2019 47 minutes ago, Tyrendian89 said: I mean, thumbs up for effort, but... holy smokes did you live up to the first part of your name there I'm not quiet sure what you mean by that excatly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
antean Players 853 posts 907 battles Report post #20 Posted March 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, Necro_von_Cortex said: I'm not quiet sure what you mean by that excatly. I think Tyrendian89 means you have 'resurrected' an old thread (or recreated the same topic already posted about). This is termed 'necroing'. The term is used either humourously or perjoratively, in this case, for humour Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
antean Players 853 posts 907 battles Report post #21 Posted March 24, 2019 I just looked at your T2 & T3 Cruiser suggestions, jfkennedy2, and they appear to be the correct time frame (first decade of 1900s). Good work to both you & (I imagine) Red_warning. It would be nice to see a couple of Scandinavian tech trees (eventually, maybe) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
[TTTX] Tyrendian89 [TTTX] Players 4,608 posts 8,139 battles Report post #22 Posted March 24, 2019 8 minutes ago, antean said: I just looked at your T2 & T3 Cruiser suggestions, jfkennedy2, and they appear to be the correct time frame (first decade of 1900s). Good work to both you & (I imagine) Red_warning. It would be nice to see a couple of Scandinavian tech trees (eventually, maybe) ...I mean, you just acknowledged you understand what a Necro is... and still you try to talk to someone about their posts from 2015? Without even pinging them? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CptBarney Players 8,127 posts 245 battles Report post #23 Posted March 24, 2019 let me see if this will do anything @jfkennedy2 i wonder what their bb's would be like. (even if it would be full fantasy mode.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gizaman Beta Tester 296 posts 3,981 battles Report post #24 Posted March 24, 2019 Nice idea. Since a lot of ships is fictional anyway it is possible. Doubt many of the new soviet line was made beside the drawing board. The tier 10 destroyer is OP though. Guided torps with a thin copper thread..lol and a second attempt to hit if missed...that seems quite bad for the other player rofl. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gustywinds Players 444 posts 5,582 battles Report post #25 Posted March 25, 2019 All you need to fend off those pesky Germans Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
