Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
__Helmut_Kohl__

Asashio : optional 10km torps

66 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles

Hey WG,

 

Why not just put optional 10km Kagero torpedoes on Asashio ?

 

(could be a second hull, that is like Kagero with either smoke or TRB)

 

Would reduce the salt and sell more ships.

 

 

(as suggested by @Yogibjoern in another thread)

( @Boris_MNE here you go)

( @MrConway think about it)

  • Cool 9
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
13 minutes ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

Hey WG,

 

Why not just put optional 10km Kagero torpedoes on Asashio ?

(Since the ships are identical)

TRB and smoke in seperate slot? Not exactly insignificant difference from Kagero.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[TOXIC]
Players
4,795 posts
12,260 battles
16 minutes ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

Hey WG,

 

Why not just put optional 10km kagero torps on Asashio ?

(Since the ships are identical)

 

Would reduce the salt and sell more ships.

 

 

(as suggested by @Yogibjoern in another thread)

Because then she would be strictly better than Kagero - TRB and separate slot is a BIG thing and the existence of 20km DWT option would make the "Kagero clone" set-up more effective (some people would be easier to catch off-guard by Asashio turning out to be able to torp them). Of course, it would work the other way as well - Asashio with DWT would still need to be treated by cap-contesting opponents as if it could torp them since only seeing their torps (or, well, reading stats while loading but there are some problems with that) could tell what configuration the ship is in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
3,274 posts
16,879 battles
15 minutes ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

Hey WG,

 

Why not just put optional 10km Kagero torpedoes on Asashio ?

(Since the ships are identical)

 

Would reduce the salt and sell more ships.

 

 

(as suggested by @Yogibjoern in another thread)

( @Boris_MNE here you go)

( @MrConway think about it)

I fail to see how that would sell more ships?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles
1 minute ago, Riselotte said:

TRB and smoke in seperate slot? Not exactly insignificant difference from Kagero.

 

I thought of an additional hull, that is basically a Kagero (smoke or TRB) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
1,099 posts
10,119 battles
1 minute ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

 

I thought of an additional hull, that is basically a Kagero (smoke or TRB) 

Or...

 

Just get Kagero?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,176 posts
5,859 battles

Nope, let people keep their mistakes. A premium Kagero is already present in the Harekaze. Asashio is beyond saving. And every small buff would become completely irreversible due to her premium status. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles
Just now, Mr_Tayto said:

Or...

 

Just get Kagero?

 

Kagero is not premium. Can't put my 19p Shima cap into that. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
1 minute ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

 

I thought of an additional hull, that is basically a Kagero (smoke or TRB) 

So, first iteration Asashio, just with buffed guns. Feels Prinz Eugen, man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
1,099 posts
10,119 battles
1 minute ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

 

Kagero is not premium. Can't put my 19p Shima cap into that. 

Why not just play Shima?

 

You'd only see tier 10s in your premium Kagero, anyway. For that matter, we also have Harekaze at tier 8. I'm struggling to see your logic here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
789 posts
7,023 battles

This discusion is stupid. Kagero has 10km torps so it would be just buffed kagero. If You want to balance it like that and keep reload booster and smoke at the same time, You would have to make different lunchers, lets say 3 torps per luncher. There needs to be a debuff in comparision to Kagero. But we all knoow that  DDs skill at the moment is "fire widespereads in general direction" so noone will use 3 tube luncher.

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles
3 minutes ago, Riselotte said:

So, first iteration Asashio, just with buffed guns. Feels Prinz Eugen, man.

 

By its own yes. As part of an adjustable ship, it is more attractive. 

 

@Mr_Tayto Harekaze has the T7 torps as a tradeoff for the Akizuki guns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
Just now, Oderisson said:

This discusion is stupid. Kagero has 10km torps so it would be just buffed kagero. If You want to balance it like that and keep reload booster and smoke at the same time, You would have to make different lunchers, lets say 3 torps per luncher. There needs to be a debuff in comparision to Kagero. But we all knoow that  DDs skill at the moment is "fire widespereads in general direction" so noone will use 3 tube luncher.

 

 

Oh holy crap, TRB, smoke and 3x3 setup on a Kagero hull with 5.4 km stealth? Sign me up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
789 posts
7,023 battles
Just now, Riselotte said:

Oh holy crap, TRB, smoke and 3x3 setup on a Kagero hull with 5.4 km stealth? Sign me up.

I said 3 torps per luncher. That makes it 2x3 torps. I meant debuff of torps not buff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles
6 minutes ago, Oderisson said:

This discusion is stupid. Kagero has 10km torps so it would be just buffed kagero. If You want to balance it like that and keep reload booster and smoke at the same time, You would have to make different lunchers, lets say 3 torps per luncher. There needs to be a debuff in comparision to Kagero. But we all knoow that  DDs skill at the moment is "fire widespereads in general direction" so noone will use 3 tube luncher.

 

 

 

That is why I said a second hull, that can only have smoke or TRB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
789 posts
7,023 battles
1 minute ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

 

That is why I said a second hull, that can only have smoke or TRB. 

I disagree because of one thing WG said a long time ago: "premiums are supposed to be unique". Torpedo reload and smoke in one configuration is this uniqueness. They wont resign from it. And I dont think they should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles
2 minutes ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

 

By its own yes. As part of an adjustable ship, it is more attractive. 

 

@Mr_Tayto Harekaze has the T7 torps as a tradeoff for the Akizuki guns. 

A bit less speed, a bit less damage, still hits hard enough to hurt and Bensons would likely love to have these on T8. Also, it would be then a choice of premium Kagero, a mediocre DD or the current retard boat, with all that implies. It's the downsides of first iteration and last iteration combined.

Just now, Oderisson said:

I said 3 torps per luncher. That makes it 2x3 torps. I meant debuff of torps not buff.

In which case, it's garbage, because 2x4 continually likely spams out more torpedoes than 2x3 with TRB. Abilitty to launch 12 torpedoes at once is not worth trading for basically a Hatsuharu setup.

 

Not to mention, Asashio historically had quad-launchers, giving it anything else likely won't happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Tester
4,156 posts
18,919 battles
3 minutes ago, Oderisson said:

I disagree because of one thing WG said a long time ago: "premiums are supposed to be unique". Torpedo reload and smoke in one configuration is this uniqueness. They wont resign from it. And I dont think they should.

 

We already had that on the old Shiratsuyu, but ok. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[THROW]
[THROW]
Players
5,061 posts
10,702 battles
1 hour ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

optional 10km Kagero torpedoes on Asashio

Not going to happen since that would make Asashio actually usable :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[FJAKA]
Players
2,871 posts
16,103 battles
1 hour ago, _Helmut_Kohl_ said:

Hey WG,

 

Why not just put optional 10km Kagero torpedoes on Asashio ?

 

(could be a second hull, that is like Kagero with either smoke or TRB)

 

Would reduce the salt and sell more ships.

 

 

(as suggested by @Yogibjoern in another thread)

( @Boris_MNE here you go)

( @MrConway think about it)

good idea...but we all know this is not gonna happen.....there were so many ideas about this ship (well to be honest first crying about it was that it is worst kagero and useless) that WG could implement if they wanted (ship was in testing for long time)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
8,474 posts
10,052 battles

Knowing WG, they'll either overbuff it or they'll pull it from the shop if they think it isn't fine. Or they pull it after overbuffing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
471 posts
2,535 battles

Neither way I won't regret I bought it, It was just for shits and giggles anyway. It will be useful on days with MM flooded with BB's. But it would be nice to have a choice anyway, At least then the other team would have a harder time judging you as a threat or not.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,025 posts
13,785 battles
1 hour ago, dCK_Ad_Hominem said:

Nope, let people keep their mistakes. A premium Kagero is already present in the Harekaze. Asashio is beyond saving. And every small buff would become completely irreversible due to her premium status. 

Mistake? LOL. Are you drunk? :D

That shippy is hilariously OP. Even if there aren't many BBs. I play with 6 km concealment now and still disrupt not only BBs but DDs too.

If someone isn't a complete noob that ship is absolutely not a mistake. But enjoy your salt I guess.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×