Jump to content
You need to play a total of 50 battles to post in this section.
Larse8x

To Many Aircraft Carriers?

21 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Players
41 posts
1,828 battles

*edited*

Edited by Daxeno
This post has been edited by the moderation team due to not being in the correct language
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
888 posts
8,197 battles

CVs are kind of going extinct, WG is doing a great job in helping that trend with introducing lines with even more ridiculous AA (Worcester and friends).

zuckerberg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[PIKAS]
Beta Tester
1,538 posts
5,890 battles

depends on Tier , where almost no AAA is existend , there are a lot of CV - in higher Tiers with Flakmonsters , seldom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG-EU]
WG Team, WoWs Wiki Team
3,499 posts
11,742 battles

>"too many CVs"

>2% of ships are CVs

>2% = too many :cap_hmm:

 

numbers are from current last-2-month stats:

0e014d1131.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[W-C]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,442 posts
6,517 battles

I thought I had seen it all....boy how wrong I was

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
1,559 posts
13,419 battles

To many? What? Is that why WG is redoing CV's? Comon man. CV's are close to non existent for obvious reasons. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
2,160 posts

There's a lot of CV's in low tier games and with them having few fighters and the ships having essentially useless AA they do pose significant problems making the games a bit boring, more than a few CV players like to sealclub as well since there's nothing to stop them.

 

The OP only has 937 battles so odds are he's met a lot of CV's and had nothing to counter them.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG-EU]
WG Team, WoWs Wiki Team
3,499 posts
11,742 battles

I just did something I should have not.

Please, everyone here: If you want to stay sane, don't take a look at OP's stats:cap_wander:

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Players
41 posts
1,828 battles
10 minutes ago, Commander_Cornflakes said:

>"too many CVs"

>2% of ships are CVs

>2% = too many :cap_hmm:

 

numbers are from current last-2-month stats:

0e014d1131.png

 

Everyone does not play Tier X. Starting at Tier IV. to tier X.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[W-C]
Beta Tester, Players, In AlfaTesters
2,442 posts
6,517 battles
9 minutes ago, Commander_Cornflakes said:

I just did something I should have not.

Please, everyone here: If you want to stay sane, don't take a look at OP's stats:cap_wander:

tenor.gif

I'm not stat bashing or anything since OP was fairly polite when he created the thread but.....damn

 

So to answer you, OP: there are more or less no CVs from tier 8 onwards....they start dying out at around tier 7, with 6 being the last trully active tier.

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[WG-EU]
WG Team, WoWs Wiki Team
3,499 posts
11,742 battles
Vor 2 Minuten, Larse8x sagte:

 

Everyone does not play Tier X. Starting at Tier IV. to tier X.

These stats are T7 to T10. Which are the most relevant tiers for CVs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[-RM-]
Beta Tester
1,396 posts
5,436 battles
1 minute ago, Larse8x said:

 

Everyone does not play Tier X. Starting at Tier IV. to tier X.

But still having a class that at maximum is 2 per side sometimes and gets fewer fewer and fewer to the point that it is the least played ship by a huge margain, and then claim there are too many is not quite right.

 

CV's are almost extinct even if you encounter 1 per 5 games you play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[NWP]
Players
1,882 posts
12,596 battles

Well, they could prolly limit the amount of CV per team to ONE at lower tiers as well.

However, I'd like WG to finally complete the CV rework (soonTM) BEFORE adjusting anything else. All adjustments they do now will need to be rebalance afterwards when the CV rework comes out (soonTM)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[SCRUB]
Quality Poster
4,506 posts
15,369 battles
20 minutes ago, Larse8x said:

 

Everyone does not play Tier X. Starting at Tier IV. to tier X.

Ok lets look at tier 3-5 Low tier ships that can see CV.. at tier 5 we already get BBs with strong AA

 

Total ships brought to battle of tier 3 to 5 = 1889551

                                               CV tier 4 and 5 = 134094

 

So tier 3-5 CV make up a massive 7% of ships brought to battle. so that is under 1 per team per game.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[AKI]
Players
78 posts
15,126 battles

No, no, this is 2018. Year of the AA (with new US CA's and CL's)

You might mean last year, 2017, when it was "The Year of the CV", oh... wait....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, Players
5,287 posts
22 minutes ago, Commander_Cornflakes said:

I just did something I should have not.

Please, everyone here: If you want to stay sane, don't take a look at OP's stats:cap_wander:

i m very curious, will look ^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[YARRR]
Beta Tester
8,204 posts
14,454 battles

Even if there were too many CV players it'd have minimal effect on others unless it's extremely excessive. CVs are capped at 2 per team in T4-7 and 1 per team at T8-10. That means in a theoretical CV overpopulation scenario you'd barely notice the difference unless you happen to play CVs yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[CR33D]
Players
3,028 posts
15,497 battles
2 hours ago, Commander_Cornflakes said:

I just did something I should have not.

Please, everyone here: If you want to stay sane, don't take a look at OP's stats:cap_wander:

Couldnt hold myself and took a quick look. My eyes bled :cap_fainting:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×