WG please stop stupid game with 5 DD

[FRMrBoumBoum]

Thx..

Its not difficult to make an game with only 4 DD. No ?

[AnEvilJoke]

"Please restrict the number of Battleships per game..."

 

"Please restrict the number of Destroyers per game..."

 

"Please regulate this, please regulate that but what ever you do don't touch what I'am currently playing..."

 

How

about

this...

 

1 fixed Carrier, 4 fixed Battleships, 4 fixed Cruisers, 3 fixed Destroyers per match. Everyone only can chose the class he wants to play because each class only has one ship and everybody gets the same captain including skills, same consumables, always the same map... ect.

Should drop the number of "unhappy" people significant, because nobody is unhappy in communism! Right?

[Culiacan_Mexico]

21 minutes ago, FRMrBoumBoum said:

WG please stop stupid game with 5 DD

 

Thx..

Its not difficult to make an game with only 4 DD. No ?

Why do you want less DDs in a game?

[Infiriel]

Want a tissue for those tears?
 

You play on lower tiers, where DD`s are especially good, however if you look at the map and actively try to control the engagement there is really a small chance that you will get killed by a DD.

Also learn the WASD "hack".

[BattleshipAP]

I feel like a babysitter having to come to these threads and explain to you that DDs are the biggest beneficiary of a DD limit. Mongs think DD limit = BB buff but it really isn't.

[SirAmra]

7 minutes ago, BattleshipAP said:

I feel like a babysitter having to come to these threads and explain to you that DDs are the biggest beneficiary of a DD limit. Mongs think DD limit = BB buff but it really isn't.

So few words, yet so much said. I personally don`t like 10 DDs in a match.....but u make a huge point in what u state.

 

[eliastion]

21 minutes ago, Culiacan_Mexico said:

Why do you want less DDs in a game?

I want less DDs in each game, they really get in the way of my DDs

[Culiacan_Mexico]

2 minutes ago, eliastion said:

I want less DDs in each game, they really get in the way of my DDs

Me too!  

 

19 minutes ago, BattleshipAP said:

I feel like a babysitter having to come to these threads and explain to you that DDs are the biggest beneficiary of a DD limit. Mongs think DD limit = BB buff but it really isn't.

You are giving away the best secrets!  

[BeauNidl3]

21 minutes ago, BattleshipAP said:

I feel like a babysitter having to come to these threads and explain to you that DDs are the biggest beneficiary of a DD limit. Mongs think DD limit = BB buff but it really isn't.

 

Same here, in DD's, especially low tier the one thing I'm concerned about is other DD's that spot me.

 

I guess the OP is a classic BBaby who doesn't like the fact that DD's can do their job which is spotting and torpedoing him. 

[El2aZeR]

What are you guys talking about? Please increase the DD soft cap so my Clemson can munch on even more delicious inferior DDs. Only 5 that are automatically dead per game aren't enough! 

[AgarwaenME]

I wish they'd changed the ship caps to be in line with history.

 

So something like

1 BB

2 CVs

2-3 CAs

5-6 DDs.

[Mr_Tayto]

41 minutes ago, BattleshipAP said:

I feel like a babysitter having to come to these threads and explain to you that DDs are the biggest beneficiary of a DD limit. Mongs think DD limit = BB buff but it really isn't.

[DJ_Die]

4 minutes ago, AgarwaenME said:

I wish they'd changed the ship caps to be in line with history.

 

So something like

1 BB

1-2 CVs

3-4 CAs

15-20 DDs.

There, fixed it for you... :)

[AgarwaenME]

17 minutes ago, DJ_Die said:

There, fixed it for you... :)

 

I had to account for merely 12 players per team 

 

Though that BB should probably be rounded down to 0 I  

[Tyrendian89]

1 hour ago, Mandalorianer said:

"Please restrict the number of Battleships per game..."

 

"Please restrict the number of Destroyers per game..."

 

"Please regulate this, please regulate that but what ever you do don't touch what I'am currently playing..."

 

How

about

this...

 

1 fixed Carrier, 4 fixed Battleships, 4 fixed Cruisers, 3 fixed Destroyers per match. Everyone only can chose the class he wants to play because each class only has one ship and everybody gets the same captain including skills, same consumables, always the same map... ect.

Should drop the number of "unhappy" people significant, because nobody is unhappy in communism! Right?

you know, yes that would drop the number of unhappy players massively.

 

It would also drop the number of players overall massively, but...

[DJ_Die]

3 minutes ago, AgarwaenME said:

 

I had to account for merely 12 players per team 

 

Though that BB should probably be rounded down to 0 I  

Fine with me. :) Every time i play a high tier cruiser i get stupid cyclones... Its so much fun if theres a fast BB somewhere and you cant be sure where :) With no BBs it would be so much easier....

[FRMrBoumBoum]

1 team = 12 boat

5 DD = half of the team (!)

5 DD = Less cruiser

5 DD = a stupid game

It is not difficult to restrict the game with 4 DD (in one team)  than stupid games with 10 dd on 24 boats.

Thx !

[BeauNidl3]

8 minutes ago, FRMrBoumBoum said:

1 team = 12 boat

5 DD = half of the team (!)

5 DD = Less cruiser

5 DD = a stupid game

It is not difficult to restrict the game with 4 DD (in one team)  than stupid games with 10 dd on 24 boats.

Thx !

 

As a cruiser (and DD) driver I can interpret your nonsense this way.

 

1 team = 12 boat

5 BB = half of the team (!) 5 isn't half of 12, but what the hell, we're making stuff up here.

5 BB = Less cruiser (BB's delete cruisers anyway, so less food for easy XP pinatas)

5 BB = a stupid game

It is not difficult to restrict the game with 3 BB (in one team)  than stupid games with 10 BB on 24 boats.

Thx !

 

See your post can easily be tweaked.

[Gleb_Reawer]

29 minutes ago, FRMrBoumBoum said:

1 team = 12 boat

5 DD = half of the team (!)

5 DD = Less cruiser <--- WTF?

5 DD = a stupid game

It is not difficult to restrict the game with 4 DD (in one team)  than stupid games with 10 dd on 24 boats.

Thx !

What on earth makes you think DD's are taking cruiser spots in the MM?

Should WG cap the number of DD's in a team, the most likely ship to take it's place would be a BB.

[eliastion]

3 hours ago, DJ_Die said:

There, fixed it for you... :)

Not really, if you want to talk about historical battles. DDs were much, much more numerous than BBs in the navies HOWEVER the proportion was't that skewed in the fleets that sailed around together. DDs had LOTS of jobs escorting and patrolling either alone or in small groups (of small ships) - a fleet that had BBs and CVs might have, say, three times as many DDs... but not twenty times as many.

[Kartoffelmos]

12 hours ago, Gleb_Reawer said:

What on earth makes you think DD's are taking cruiser spots in the MM?

Should WG cap the number of DD's in a team, the most likely ship to take it's place would be a BB.

 

Not when battleships are already filling up their allocated slots (5 on each side) which is happening in most games these days. As such, a DD limit will bring more cruisers into the game, which can hardly be called a DD buff. Yes, the amount of ships capable of detecting a DD will be reduced but the amount of people shooting spotted DDs will increase. There's also the issue of radar, hydro and/or scout/fighter planes...

 

For the battleships, they will get one more ship to shoot, as well as having one less DD to worry about. Clearly, this is not a buff at all .

[BeauNidl3]

1 hour ago, Kartoffelmos said:

 

Not when battleships are already filling up their allocated slots (5 on each side) which is happening in most games these days. As such, a DD limit will bring more cruisers into the game, which can hardly be called a DD buff. Yes, the amount of ships capable of detecting a DD will be reduced but the amount of people shooting spotted DDs will increase. There's also the issue of radar, hydro and/or scout/fighter planes...

 

For the battleships, they will get one more ship to shoot, as well as having one less DD to worry about. Clearly, this is not a buff at all .

 

It's far from unknown for games to have more than 5 BB a side, I've seen quite a few 7 and 8's. Limiting DD numbers to protect the precious BB's from the nasty fishes won't bring more cruisers.

 

Many people that would prefer to play cruisers swapped to BB's and DD's because they got sick of being deleted by BB's, the number of cruisers being played is unlikely to increase due to the BB numbers. 

[PapVogele]

You know what would work to reduce the number of DDs? Hard cap BBs to 3 per team, less BBs would mean more cruisers, more cruisers would in time reduce the number of DDs and in turn increase the number of cruisers even more. There you have it!

[DJ_Die]

13 hours ago, eliastion said:

Not really, if you want to talk about historical battles. DDs were much, much more numerous than BBs in the navies HOWEVER the proportion was't that skewed in the fleets that sailed around together. DDs had LOTS of jobs escorting and patrolling either alone or in small groups (of small ships) - a fleet that had BBs and CVs might have, say, three times as many DDs... but not twenty times as many.

Well, of course. But then, for example, most US battle fleets were based around carriers and even their BBs were pretty much just escorts and there were often twice as many CVs than BBs... :)

[HystericalAccuracy]

1 hour ago, BeauNidl3 said:

Many people that would prefer to play cruisers swapped to BB's and DD's because they got sick of being deleted by BB's

That´s where i feel adressed (cruiser-main).

 

It is really discouraging to hit the "Battle" button

-wait a minute to get in fight

-manouver in position for 2-3 minutes

-start fighting and wiggle and curve around like a race driver

-see the shells shatter and ricochet on the thickly armoured BB

-and then the BB lands a lol-salvo

....i sit in port again.

 

With a BB i simply move slowly towards the enemy and blap cruisers. DDs occasionally get the famous AP-penetration and flee. I make a mistake - no problem, the BB-citadels got lowered (like the demands on player´s capabilities). That´s braindead one-hand play; it´s boring and i don´t understand how seemingly most players prefer that.

 

A good proof that BB-players are less resilient is the whining in chat when a match has 4 or 5 DDs per side: "Oooh, so many DDs". Cruisers have to face at least five (or like yesterday: eight) BBs per side every time - but they take it manly without moaning.

 

So: WG please stop stupid game with 5+ BB.