Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'ijn cv'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Forum
    • English Speaking Forum
    • Deutschsprachige Community
    • Polska Społeczność
    • Česká a slovenská komunita
    • Communauté francophone
    • Comunità Italiana
    • Comunidad de habla española
    • Türkçe Topluluk
  • Mod Section
    • Rules, Announcements and General Discussion (English)
    • Modding Tutorials, Guides and Tools (English)
    • Interface Mods
    • Visual Mods
    • Sound Mods
    • Modpacks
    • Other Mods and Programs
    • Archive
  • Historical Section

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • This Day in History

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Twitter


Location


Interests

Found 5 results

  1. Bonsoir messieurs dames ! Nouveau topic; Cela n'est pas une blague, on m'en avait touché mot sur "shipcomrade" Le Porte avion Tier 10 japonais "Hakuryu" reçoit un nouveau build aérien: - Le build 2-3-3 est remplacé par un build 3-3-2 Suppression de une formation de bomber et rajout de une formation de chasseur. Voici une vidéo de Farazelleth qui traite du sujet. Après réflexion avec un ami, je dirais pour cette modif "correcte" afin de contrer le nouveau build du Midway (2-2-2) - le Midway 14 chasseurs VS ancien Hakuryu 10 chasseurs. Cela pouvait être léger en combat aérien au long thermes même avec le changement de tier. (simple deff clic v clic) - le Midway 14 chasseurs VS nouveau Hakuryu 15 chasseurs déjà plus jouable au long thermes. Cependant cela ne sera juste que "strife sur strife" Wg à toujours eux de mal a équilibrer les CV et il est vrai que cela il est vrai aussi que cela fait un bon moment que les CV ne sont pas aidé.. Cependant là ça crie déjà.. mais les build sur le Ryujo 3-1-1 Hiryu 3-1-2 Shokaku 3-1-2 Taiho 3-2-2 non jamais vraiment fait crié ou on dérangé certains joueurs :V voilà Ainsi que pour les CV IJN on à chaque fois gagner un chasseur et un bomber sur les builds. (Ryujo -> Hiryu & Shokaku -> Taiho puis Hakuryu) Cependant la le Midway gagne une formation de torpilleur et Hakuryu une de bombardier.. les dégâts sont loin d’être les mêmes.Cependant de quoi j'ai peur maintenant (et cela est débile) c'est que les CV US pleure au nerf lourd des CV IJN et cela n’arrangera en RIEN ! l’équilibrage des CV avec le jeux, bien au contraire.Je vous pris Wargaming faite attention si'l vous plais. Demandez de l'aide au "vrai" bon joueur CV sur chaque serveur ! Merci de votre aide @Tanatoy Voyons voir comment cela va évoluer. Cordialement
  2. Hi! Should you show some screenshots about IJN CV captain skills and upgrades? I'd like to investigate them. I just start with Hiryu, but my captains usually wallk through all lines.
  3. Hallo liebe Käptns, Wie viele von uns wahrscheinlich schon alle wissen, gibt Wargaming wenig bzw einen feu*** Dre*** auf unsere Diskussionen im Forum. Sie treffen ihre Entscheidungen, basierend auf kalte, harte Fakten in Form von Zahlen und Statistiken. Hier finden wir Zahlen und Statistiken aus der WOWS Beta. Die Gründe, warum Wargaming die IJN CVs verändert haben: (Credits gehen an ezydomo, er hat hier großartige Arbeit geleistet! Originalthread: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/27867-snapshot-stats-of-the-eu-server/) Kurzversion auf Deutsch für alle: ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** IJN CVs sind mit Abstand die beste Klasse/Nation, vor den USN CVs und vor alle anderen Schiffsklassen/Nationen. Eindeutig zu sehen ab Beginn T4 bis T8 durch die roten Linien. ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** Eine andere statistische Grafik (auch von ezydomo, Originalthread: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/28778-the-good-the-bad-and-the-mediocre-per-tier/) X-Achse ist die Gewinnhäufigkeit. Y-Achse der durchschnittliche Schade. D.h. wenn ein Schiff in rechten oberen Quadranten sich befindet, ist es sehr gut im Vergleich zu allen anderen Schiffen. IJN Cvs, von Hosho, Zuiho, Ryujo, Hiryu bis Shokaku, sind alle rechts oben. Schaut genau nach und ihr findet sie allesamt oben rechts. Wenn sich IJN Cvs sich beschweren, dass USN CVs sie outperformen, dann fühlt euch bitte so frei und sucht nach Namen wie Langley, Bogue, Independence (Tipp: sie sind alle in dem Kreis, wo auch die meisten anderen Schiffe/Klassen sich befinden, also innerhalb der normalen Parameter sich performen. Manche sind sogar schlechter, wie die Bogue, die sich links unten befindet (d.h. Winrate niedrig, Dmg auch niedrig)) Zusammenfassung: Wargaming hat mit diesen gewonnenen Daten aus der Beta gearbeitet und haben sich entschieden, die IJN CVs anzupassen, damit sie gerade im Low-Tier Bereich nicht mehr so hervorstechen, sondern sich wie andere Schiffe schadensmäßig & siegesmäßig zu verhalten, besonders wie die USN CVs. So, nun lass uns die Flammenwerfer, Railguns, und was alles sonst noch im Arsenal ist, bereit machen, und lasst den Flame-War beginnen --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P.S.: Das sind allesamt nur kalte Daten Fakten. Nummer & Statistiken. Nicht beeinflusst wie bei Forendiskussionen durch die persönliche Meinungen des einen oder durch seine/ihre Lieblingsschiffe/Nationen. Viel Spaß beim interpretieren der Statistiken! P.P.S.: Buffed.de hat die Statistiken auch gut zusammengefasst und interpretiert: http://www.buffed.de/World-of-Warships-Spiel-42981/Specials/World-of-warships-statistik-overpowerd-Erfahrungspunkte-Flugzeugtraeger-1169585/ Zitat von Buffed:
  4. Introduction This topic is entered in the game play section of the forum because it not only concerns Aircraft Carrier game play but overall game play in WOWS. The vaunted WOWS "Carrier rework" has been mentioned on and off over the past two years. During that time the current state of affairs of Aircraft Carriers in WOWS has not been significantly altered by meaningful changes let alone improvements. The only two noteworthy changes with regard to Carriers that have been implemented are (1) the new Flight Modes of the USA Carriers that was introduced at the end of 2017 and (2) the vastly increased number of new ships with very powerful Anti-Aircraft setups and/or Defensive Fire AA (for example ALABAMA, MASSACHUSETTS and the five new USA light cruisers). As a result there remains a virtual absence of meaningful WOWS Carrier changes to address some of the major Carrier related issues. The vaunted WOWS "Carrier rework" will in all probability not be implemented until somewhere around late 2019 at best, in other words it is a long term event. In order to improve the Carrier game play that currently exists in the short and medium term, that is in 2018-2019, some plausible solutions can be proposed and implemented to address the most serious issues for the benefit of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers in WOWS. This topic therefore aims to offers such possible and plausible solutions for the 2018-2019 short to medium term to improve Carrier game play from the perspective of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers. The solutions proposed are intended to be ones that can/should be fairly easily implemented by WOWS Developers with a minimum of effort and all need to lie within the framework of the current Carrier and general WOWS game play and game play mechanisms. In other words, the solutions proposed in this topic are NOT intended as radical solutions which are a full departure of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. Instead the solutions proposed want to build on the strengths and possibilities of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. The Current Carrier Related Major Issues Proposed Short and Medium Term Carrier related Solutions The individual solutions proposed in this section are to be regarded as possible solutions for the short to medium term to improve Carrier game play from the perspective of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers. The idea is to offer solutions that should be fairly easily to implement by WOWS Developers with a minimum of effort and that lie within the overall framework of the current Carrier and general WOWS game play and game play mechanisms. As such these solutions are intended to build on the existing strengths and possibilities of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. SPOTTING SOLUTION (Alternative A) SPOTTING SOLUTION (Alternative B) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative A) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative B) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative C) INVISIBLE SHIP AA FIRE SOLUTION DEFENSIVE AA FIRE SOLUTION DESTROYER PROTECTION SOLUTION CRUISER AND BATTLESHIP PROTECTION SOLUTION UNIQUE AND LEGENDARY COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL SOLUTION COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL LEVEL 1 SOLUTION COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL LEVEL 2 SOLUTION PLAYER BASE EDUCATION SOLUTION TIER 5 CARRIER SOLUTION CARRIER-AA DIVISION SOLUTION NON-USA BATTLESHIP AP BOMB VULNERABILITY SOLUTION
  5. Hello my fellow captains, As many of you probably already knew, Wargaming doesn't care about our discussions here in forum. They make their desicions based on cold facts in form of numbers in statistics. So here they are again gentlemen, the reasons in numbers why Wargaming changed IJN CVs: (post by ezydomo, thanks for his awesome work! original thread here: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/27867-snapshot-stats-of-the-eu-server/) in short: ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** IJN CVs clearly outperforms USN CVs and every other class of ships of both nations from the beginnings on, from T4 to T8 - damage, exp, and winratewise. ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************************************************************************** based on another statistic graphic (again from ezydomo, original post here: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/28778-the-good-the-bad-and-the-mediocre-per-tier/) X-axis is the winrate, Y-axis the average dmg. So a ship is at top right, it performs very good compared with others. IJN CVs, beginning from Hosho, Zuiho, Ryujo, Hiryu, Shokaku, take a closer look and you can find them all at top right area. If IJN CVs complain about USN CVs outperform them, feel free to search for Langley, Bogue, Independence (hint: they are in the circle, where most of the other ships are and perform like them, sometimes even lower, like Bogue at bottom left) In conclusion: Wargaming took those numbers they got from Beta and decided to change IJN CVs to hopefully perform like other classes of ships and like USN CVs. Now, arm yourselves with flame-throwers, railguns, and let the flame war begin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P.S.: these are cold hard facts. Numbers and statistics. Not reflected by one's personal opinion or ones favourite ship classes/nations. Have fun at interpreting those numbers.
×