Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'french cv'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Forum
    • English Speaking Forum
    • Deutschsprachige Community
    • Polska Społeczność
    • Česká a slovenská komunita
    • Communauté francophone
    • Comunità Italiana
    • Comunidad de habla española
    • Türkçe Topluluk
  • Mod Section
    • Rules, Announcements and General Discussion (English)
    • Modding Tutorials, Guides and Tools (English)
    • Interface Mods
    • Visual Mods
    • Sound Mods
    • Modpacks
    • Other Mods and Programs
    • Archive
  • Historical Section

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • This Day in History

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Twitter


Location


Interests

Found 3 results

  1. Bonjour, Je suis nouveau sur WOWs mais déjà, étant arrivé aux tiers IV-V, je trouve que les games de porte avions se ressemblent souvent. peut être, ce phénomène est du à un manque de portes avions dans le jeu. Il ne serait pas inintéressant que Wargaming ajoute une nouvelle classe de portes avions. Certains ont pensé à des CV anglais ou russes, toutefois Je pense que s'il devait y avoir une nouvelle classe de CV dans le jeu, il ne serait pas impensable que cette nouvelle branche de CV soit Française. Dans leur vidéo sur ses projets en 2017, les développeurs de Wargaming n'ont-il pas annoncé que la France leur avait même fourni des projets de CV. Vu que cette classe de navire ne compte pour l'instant que 2 branches, une troisième branche de CV n'est pas à exclure dans les prochaines mises à jour Qu'en pensez vous ?
  2. Je m'étonne que le sujet n'ai pas été créé auparavant, tiens. Et si, et si WG nous sortais une branche de porte avions Français? Pour se marrer un peu, des pronostics? Je verrais bien: TIV- Le Bapaume 20 noeuds, 2 canon de 138mm et un impressionnant groupe aérien de 1 avion. Les Anglais n'ont qu'à bien se tenir. Evidemment, une liberté peut être prise en jeu pour coller plus d'avions sur le bousin. Ou bien TIV- Le Commandant Teste 20 noeuds, 12 canons de 100mm. 26 hydravions. D'accord, c'est un porte hydravion, mais ça serait assez amusant, non? TVI- Béarn 21 noeuds, 8 canons de 155mm, 40 avions. TVIII- Classe Joffre 33 noeuds, 8 tubes de 130mm, 40 avions. Un projet annulé d'immédiat avant guerre. TX- Arromanche? Ou: PA28?
  3. Introduction This topic is entered in the game play section of the forum because it not only concerns Aircraft Carrier game play but overall game play in WOWS. The vaunted WOWS "Carrier rework" has been mentioned on and off over the past two years. During that time the current state of affairs of Aircraft Carriers in WOWS has not been significantly altered by meaningful changes let alone improvements. The only two noteworthy changes with regard to Carriers that have been implemented are (1) the new Flight Modes of the USA Carriers that was introduced at the end of 2017 and (2) the vastly increased number of new ships with very powerful Anti-Aircraft setups and/or Defensive Fire AA (for example ALABAMA, MASSACHUSETTS and the five new USA light cruisers). As a result there remains a virtual absence of meaningful WOWS Carrier changes to address some of the major Carrier related issues. The vaunted WOWS "Carrier rework" will in all probability not be implemented until somewhere around late 2019 at best, in other words it is a long term event. In order to improve the Carrier game play that currently exists in the short and medium term, that is in 2018-2019, some plausible solutions can be proposed and implemented to address the most serious issues for the benefit of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers in WOWS. This topic therefore aims to offers such possible and plausible solutions for the 2018-2019 short to medium term to improve Carrier game play from the perspective of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers. The solutions proposed are intended to be ones that can/should be fairly easily implemented by WOWS Developers with a minimum of effort and all need to lie within the framework of the current Carrier and general WOWS game play and game play mechanisms. In other words, the solutions proposed in this topic are NOT intended as radical solutions which are a full departure of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. Instead the solutions proposed want to build on the strengths and possibilities of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. The Current Carrier Related Major Issues Proposed Short and Medium Term Carrier related Solutions The individual solutions proposed in this section are to be regarded as possible solutions for the short to medium term to improve Carrier game play from the perspective of both the opponents and proponents of Carriers. The idea is to offer solutions that should be fairly easily to implement by WOWS Developers with a minimum of effort and that lie within the overall framework of the current Carrier and general WOWS game play and game play mechanisms. As such these solutions are intended to build on the existing strengths and possibilities of the current WOWS Carrier game play and current overall WOWS game play. SPOTTING SOLUTION (Alternative A) SPOTTING SOLUTION (Alternative B) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative A) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative B) FIGHTER SOLUTION (Alternative C) INVISIBLE SHIP AA FIRE SOLUTION DEFENSIVE AA FIRE SOLUTION DESTROYER PROTECTION SOLUTION CRUISER AND BATTLESHIP PROTECTION SOLUTION UNIQUE AND LEGENDARY COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL SOLUTION COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL LEVEL 1 SOLUTION COMMANDER CARRIER SKILL LEVEL 2 SOLUTION PLAYER BASE EDUCATION SOLUTION TIER 5 CARRIER SOLUTION CARRIER-AA DIVISION SOLUTION NON-USA BATTLESHIP AP BOMB VULNERABILITY SOLUTION
×