Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'RDF'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Forum
    • English Speaking Forum
    • Deutschsprachige Community
    • Polska Społeczność
    • Česká a slovenská komunita
    • Communauté francophone
    • Comunità Italiana
    • Comunidad de habla española
    • Türkçe Topluluk
  • Mod Section
    • Rules, Announcements and General Discussion (English)
    • Modding Tutorials, Guides and Tools (English)
    • Interface Mods
    • Visual Mods
    • Sound Mods
    • Modpacks
    • Other Mods and Programs
    • Archive
  • Historical Section


  • Community Calendar
  • This Day in History

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start





Website URL








Found 5 results

  1. Himbeerchen

    Do you encounter more static gameplay?

    Simple question. There are enough RPF-threads out there, i want to collect some informations from the playerbase. It is not about your position towards the skills, just the things you experience after patch 0.6.0.
  2. Dear members of the Wargaming Design bureau, I'm writing this letter to you, so you can avoid another PR-desaster. After the thing with the Alabama and the Christmas-Campaign, it seems direly needed. I understand that the choice between RDF and "Concealment Expert" is supposed to give us a choice between "seeing better" or "being seen". HOWEVER the concept of RDF is stupid. It hardcounteres "Concealment Expert" it makes stealth USELESS, and thereby ships with it. Replace it. What do you mean by "NO". I mean it. Just replace it. [...] WHAT???, you don't know what to replace it with that would give players a 'meaningful choice'? I have a solution: "Surveillance Expert". Grants +50% to the range of assured detection base range before upgrades (like the "Target Aquisition System Mod 1"). That would mean IF I ran a Tirpitz (or by that manner EVERY other ship) with that skill AND "Target Aquisition System Mod 1" I would get an area of 4km around me that every vessel would be detected in. Under normal circumstances that does not make a huge difference, but alike Concealment Expert it is situational and players who know how to make the most out of their ships capabilities will be able to use it well. Radar, and hydro would be unaffected. Yes I am aware that that could have huge implications. But considering the high tier meta, I seldomly find myself closer than 8km to the closest enemy. And low tier ships DON'T get the option to fit the upgrade to increase the assured detection of enemy ships. "Surveillance Expert" could/would give a meaningful choice. JUST DO IT! Best Regards 4plains
  3. mikelight1805

    RDF is there another way?

    90% of the player base responding to this poll http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/71283-implementation-of-rdf/ are unhappy with RDF in its current form I am sure that considering it has got all the way to public test, that RDF is coming to the game regardless of all the negative rep it is picking up. So, is there another way? I would like to hope there is. So in a constructive way, how could it enter the game in a more acceptable format? As RDF is a passive skill, it cannot be turned off. So, how about making it "ping" like sonar would. Every 30 or 45 seconds, you get a RDF ping that shows the sector that the nearest enemy ship is? It could be a broad sector, between 30 and 45 degrees. The player being pinged should still get the warning on screen like in the current test to warn them, but at least they know that for the next 45 seconds they have the opportunity to adjust their positioning without being tracked? I am just trying to be constructive.
  4. Okay, first of all please dont bash me too hard. I tried it on my Belfast and almost all of my DDs and its not worth the 4 points at all. It only comes into play 1 out of 3 matches and for a short period of time, there are far better skills/builds which are always active and useful. I even respecced my Fletcher because all the information it gave me was useless, like "there is a DD at B" - when they have 6 DDs. Thanks i dont need a 4 point skill to be sure there will be somebody heading B. Or "hey, you, there is Yamato reversing behind that cliff, 5 km from you", oh thank you its only visible by everybody i really needed that info. I currently use it only on my Kamikaze R for further testing but i am pretty sure i will switch back to AFT and use my brain instead to win the games... On a side note: IFHE is useless on american 127mm (tested on Benson, Fletcher, Flint) i dont know what are the people smoking who say 12 shell hits on the superstructure of a NewMexico for 2000 dmg is an amazing improvement compered to a regular build.