Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'North Carolina'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Forum
    • English Speaking Forum
    • Deutschsprachige Community
    • Polska Społeczność
    • Česká a slovenská komunita
    • Communauté francophone
    • Comunità Italiana
    • Comunidad de habla española
    • Türkçe Topluluk
  • Mod Section
    • Rules, Announcements and General Discussion (English)
    • Modding Tutorials, Guides and Tools (English)
    • Interface Mods
    • Visual Mods
    • Sound Mods
    • Modpacks
    • Other Mods and Programs
    • Archive
  • Historical Section

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • This Day in History

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Twitter


Location


Interests

Found 10 results

  1. NC is one of my favorite BB, I am 5mil short of purchasing it. What a joy it is to find out that the new Permanent Cammo is based on Type Measure 12 used in 1942. I would just like to say thank you WG for binging this. Anyone else think the same? I also brought Hipper Cammo and eagerly awaited for her Atlantic bow visual upgrade in one of the recent patches. Please do more
  2. b_2k

    Amagi vs NC

    Moin Community, ich habe seit einigen Tagen nun die Amagi, die NC habe ich bereits etwas länger und auf ihr auch die bisher meisten Runden aller BBs. Bisher war die NC mein absoluter liebling, doch seit ich jetzt die Amagi voll ausgebaut im hafen habe, hat sich das bild zu gunsten der Amagi verändert. Für mich ist die Amagi ganz klar der bessere BB auf Tier 8, zwar ist ihre maximale Reichweite mit 19,1 Kilometer geringer aber ein wirkliches "Problem" stellt das in meinen Augen nicht da. Wo sind die Vorteile des Japaners? - Bessers Schadensbild, weit bessere penetrations leistung - Agiler -Schneller - Bessere MA Nachteile: - Weniger AA - Weicher als die NC Besagten Nachteile haben für mich allerdings bisher kein Problem dargestellt. Besonders der Damage mit der Amagi ist nicht nur Gefühlt höher, er lässt sich nachweisen. Die Stats sprechen hier eine ganz deutliche Sprache. Auch gereichen der Amagi drei Geschützte im Heck bei Rückzügen ganz klar zum Vorteil, gegen über nur einem Geschützt der NC. Und auch wenn die AA schwächer ist, so holt sie trotzdem das ein oder andere Flugzeug vom Himmel. Bei den Vorteilen kommen ganz klar ihre Geschütze zum tragen. Durchschnittstreffer machen mehr schaden als die der NC, Citas kommen ebenfalls viel öfters vor. Insgesamt scheinen die Granaten auch eine weit bessere durschlagsleistung zu haben. Wo ich bei der NC schon mal verzweifl, das, trotz treffer, null schaden rum kommt, haut die Amagi mit 5-8K Damage rein. Und sollte sich mal jemanden in den Nahbereich der Amagi trauen, bricht die Hölle los. Die MA der Nagato war schon episch, die Amagi steht hier in nichts nach. Bei der NC kommt es auch mal zu treffern und sogar abschüssen der MA, aber auch hier punktet die Amagi. Ich muss es leider einfach sagen: Die Amagi ist in allen belangen der NC überlegen und macht, zumindest mir, ganz klar viel mehr Spaß als die NC. Wie sieht es bei euch aus, liebe BB Kevins? Meine Stats dazu im vergleich: Amagi: Erfahrung 1.815,75 Schaden verursacht 77.214,67 Zerstörte Kriegsschiffe 1,42 Flugzeuge abgeschossen 4,25 Trefferleistung der Hauptbatterie 26% Basiseroberung 0,00 Basisverteidigung 0,00 NC: Erfahrung 1.665,34 Schaden verursacht 53.506,62 Zerstörte Kriegsschiffe 0,91 Flugzeuge abgeschossen 5,86 Trefferleistung der Hauptbatterie 28% Basiseroberung 0,00 Basisverteidigung 0,00
  3. Hi all, After 150 battles (no "Premium") in my beloved "North Carolina" I am now almost at the threshold of the "Iowa"! I love my "North Carolina" and I have great battles in her (even though vast majority is Tier IX and Tier X) - my WinRate is OK (was above 60% all in solo just few days ago) and I have more than average stats in other fields as well. So... should I stop at "North Carolina" with USN BB line (I would keep her just as I kept "Colorado" and "New Mexico") or should I continue to "Iowa" and Tier IX? What is your experience? Is it worth buying and using "Iowa" at Tier IX compared to what is already present with "North Carolina" at Tier VIII? Leo "Apollo11" P.S. Since my childhood I have 1:350 diorama of USS BB-56 "Washington" and I immensely enjoyed my WoWs trip to "North Carolina" (since there is no "Washington" yet in the game) - that was my initial goal when i started playing 1+ years ago - to have her!
  4. So I'm pretty hyped for the tier 8 BB matchups we'll get ingame soon™, because it looks to be harbor many famous battleships of the WW2 era. I'm also a huge fan of Tosa and Amagi-classes, but I chose to keep paper out of this to keep it nice and simple. Rules: Ship was completed and commisioned Only classes/unique ships (if your pick would be Tirpitz for example vote for Bismarck) Commissioned after 1935 (so no Nelson or Hood even though I feel they fit tier 7 better imo) Iowa and Yamato are already tier 9 and 10 ingame already so none of them The contestants (so far): Lets start with Germany's tanky steel beasts of the Bismarck class that really shouldn't need an introduction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bismarck-class_battleship In addition to having the infamous turtleback armor, these ships were heavily armored all around as well giving the other contestants a hard time dealing substantial damage to this hunk of "muh german engineering". Other than having a weaker main armament than most of the competition, the two ships of the Bismarck class were considerably fast, had a solid AA suite and a plethora of potent secondaries. Second up is probably one of Bismarck's rivals, the King George V class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_George_V-class_battleship_(1939) Ships of these class are recognized by the unique turret setup of two quad turrets and one dual turret with 14" guns, which gives this ship the smallest caliber of the competition, but also the most guns of the pack. The KGV's has the thickes main armor belt in this competition, this was accompanied by a heavy AA armament and a reasonable speed. Next one was one of the Royal navies allies, but not in this competition. Here the ships of the North Carolina class can fire all she wants: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina-class_battleship These monstrosities carries some of the heaviest armament of competitors with her 16" guns. Though she's one of the slowest ones with us, along with the upcoming South Dakota has the heaviest AA suite and a bow on potential only one competitor here will be able to overcome. Since the Ships of the South Dakota class are much of the same I'll just throw her in there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota-class_battleship_(1939) Having most of the same strenghts as the North Carolina, South Dakota could kick just as much [edited]. The most notable difference is South Dakota being more compact and protected, but in return a tad bit slower. Following the trend of 2A1, I think following up with the Littorio class here makes sense https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littorio-class_battleship The Littorio sisters were armed with 15" guns with the same number of guns and in the same setup as South Dakota and North Carolina, so you may ask yourself "How can they possibly compete?!"... Well let me tell you, the Littorio's 15" guns had muzzle velocities reaching 850 mps for AP and 880 mps for HE, not only does this give the Littorio an advantage over conventional 15"ers in penetration, but also better trajectories and travel time. The Littorios were also very fast and carrying a rather respectable secondary battery. Littorio's rival is the next one up, and that is of course the french built Richelieu Class https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_battleship_Richelieu You remember I said only one contestant here would be able to beat NC's and SD's bow-on potential, well in case you hadn't noticed it.. this is it. Using the interesting and unusual setup of having all the main armament placed forward in a super firing pair of quad turrets. Being both fast and reasonably armoured were not the only strenghts of this ship, it had quite the AA suite as well a good amount of secondaries even though they were mounted in a questionable setup. What these ships lacked in raw firepower, they made up for in being good all around elsewhere. I felt that HMS Vanguard would fit being the last contestant knowing it was also the last battleship ever launched marking the end of an era in naval history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Vanguard_(23) Fast, AA and Armor, this Battleship had it all... yeah okay maybe not the alpha damage we might have expected, but this is again a very balanced all around battle ship that could probably be brought in almost every battle without fearing any hard counters among the other BBs. Now that that we know our contestants, its high time you take your picks and place your bets.
  5. So I've just come back from a 6'ish month break 2 weeks ago. And oh boy was I looking forward to getting back into my NC having almost only just gotten through the Colorado grind before my break (may that ship rot in hell). But - unless I'm very much mistaken the guns have been nerfed in one or more ways since my Break. Anything beyond 14'ish kms is impossible to hit with anything other than lucky strikes. The AP is atrociously bad at penning other BBs at Range. The shells hang time and trajectory also seem worse than I remember them. Now she can still nose tank like a boss. But this kind of dispersion and lack of pen is a bit over the top imo. I'm having almost only horrible games in her now (with the odd RnG blessed ones here and there). Feel that I'm pretty much forced to nose tank into the 12-14km range (which incidentally is actually my preferred play style). But even then the huge dispersion and lousy AP performance, combined with what seems like an ever increasing tendency of players camping, means that I'm just acting as a low dmg dealing tank.... And that ain't exactly fun - or cheap. Some form of Buff to either Dispersion, AP performance or trajectory would be really really nice! EDIT: Apparently nothing has been changed, so it was only my then recent contact with the Colorado that made me remember the NC with such fondness. Also: and this is my own theory: camping players have become more prominent and as i see it the NC can still shine as part of an assault - but if no one is attacking.... Then attacking by yourself is just futile yolo-mode.
  6. Bonjour. Le problème se présente avec le North Carolina : 3 squadrons d'avions m'attaquent : 2 de bombardiers et un de torpilleurs. Je désigne les torpilleurs à viser, mais quoi que je fasse cette idiote de AA tire sur les bombardiers... ^^ Je précise que je n'ai pas le niveau 4 de capitaine pour doubler l'intensité de AA. J'ai juste le Niveau 1 et le niveau 4 d'artillerie. Est-ce que c'est un bug ou bien est-ce "normal" ? Merci.
  7. First of all, sorry if there is already a similar topic but I didn't find nothing similar in the last few months. If there is, a link to the topic is more than welcome. I play mostly USN battleship and I actualy play on the Colorado, planning to stop at the North Carolina since for now the Montana doesn't appeal me that much. Anyway, I have some doubts about the skill I should choose for the captain. The first setup is the one I'm thinking to follow, the second one a more oriented to the AA I think, but i'm unsure if the manual AA skill is really "worth it" on the NC, and if justify the removal of "Situation Awareness" and "Superintendent". The upgrades on the ship would be: Main Battery Modification 1 AA Guns Modification 2 Damage Control System Modification 1 Steering Gears Modification 2 Target Acquisition System Modification 1 The other doubt is about the Tirpitz, since I'll find myself often brawling with it I wonder if it's worth to take the Manual Fire Control for the secondary guns since the -60% of dispersion is very tempting. But with this setup I'll find myself with 1 point that i don't really know how to invest and without some nice skills at Tier 3. Maybe I can give up two Tier 1 skills to get enough points to take "High Alert" or "Superintendent". Since I intend to play it in close quarters, the upgrades would be the same as the NC but with "Seconday Battery Modification 2" instead of "AA Guns Modification 2". The alternative would be a scheme as the first I post here for the NC. I know there is a "low concealment" build but honestly I don't think It will fit my playstyle since i often tend to stick with the cruisers to divert the fire from them and hopefully receive and give some support against the priority targets. Thanks in advance and forgive me for grammar mistakes, sadly I'm not very skilled in the English language.
  8. kountouriotis_gr

    North Carolina vs Yamato 1 on 1

    Tier vs Skill
  9. This series of guides goes to very detail about ship behavior tactics and stats. Videos include port view + captain skills + modules + stats comparisons + gameplay action Tier 3: Tier 4: NIKOLAI Tier 5: NEW YORK KONGO Tier 6: NEW MEXICO FUSO WARSPITE Tier 7: COLORADO NAGATO Tier 8: NORTH CAROLINA TIRPITZ AMAGI Tier 9: IOWA IZUMO Tier 10: MONTANA YAMATO
  10. viceadmiral123

    AP shell time to target increased?

    I noticed North Carolina's AP shell now takes about 15 seconds to reach 21km. Has there been the usual ninja nerf, or is this just cosmetic correction of the timer? Haven't player many ships yet to compare.
×