TheKaramelka

Öland - 1948 De Zeven Provincien - 1953 Saipan - 1946 Pobeda - 1950 I cant say that this ship somehow ruing the balance

You will probably be surprised, but for this tech tree it will be possible to assemble a battleship development tree. There will be both dreadnoughts and their modernization, as well as various variants of Riauchello-class battleships. Tech tree features: Good dispersion, range, RoF and HE shell damage Powerful secondary battery with improved accuracy and range Decent concealment Good reload time Bad AA defense Slower turret traverse speed Armor belt is relatively thin for a battleship and the citadel is all along the length of the main battery. On higl level - not big main caliber (381 mm) Bad high speed Representatives: Prem ship: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Considering the trend of dividing branches into battleships and battlecruisers, it becomes clear that almost all branches will have them (considering what kind of ships we have). As usual, I do not want all these newfangled things with the mechanics of sighting, because this is already complete elfism. Tech tree features: The torpedo tubes have the turning mechanics previously introduced on the British battleships and Japanese light cruisers$ Like all Japanese ship, have avarage torpedoes with big damage and speed; Available Main Battery Reload Booster, which is available on Hyuuga and Maya: fast recharge, but fewer consumables than others (3 instead of 4); Like other battlecruisers, they do not stand out for their high firing range; The tops of the branch are equipped with a 100 mm secondary gun, which has an increased firing range; Representatives: Replacement in main tech tree: Premium ship: In subsequent posts, I will make assumptions about the battlecruiser of Japan. Also, if you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Earlier, I made an assumption about what cruisers and destroyers of the Commonwealth of Nations development tree could be. Here we will see what the battleships of this nation can be. Tech tree features: From levels 3 to 5 you will be met by dreadnought ships from the First World War. They are not distinguished by strengths, but they cannot be called weak either; Starting at level 6, you will be greeted by battlecruisers that could be shipped due to obsolescence to Commonwealth countries; Great concealment; Not good armor; Improved penetration and firing range for secondary; Like other representatives of the nation, has a Crawling Smoke Generator from level 8, and starting from level 7: Specialized Repair Teams; Representatives: In subsequent posts, I will make assumptions about the battlecruiser of Japan. Also, if you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Even wiki dont agree with you

I, too, can take it closer to the battlecruisers, however, we have connoisseurs of history who can obviously dig into this. But knowing WG, they can take such a project as a basis and make some kind of battlecruiser with 16 410 mm guns

I still can't understand how Number 13 is classified. In some sources it is a battlecruiser, but in others it is Yuzuru Hiragi's fast battleship (which was famous for battleships and not battlecruisers). So I tried not to touch them at all.

I’ll probably upset you, but even in the 1940s, country abbreviations were used. The same HMAS Perth we have in the game was given to Australia in 1939. Similarly, INS Mysore was transferred to India already in 1957, and just like HMAS Vampire 2 was built in Australia. HMS - the designation of BRITISH ships, not the Commonwealth of Nations, you repeat again

In DevBlog we got Pan-American cruiser tech tree. Here i want predict of the tech tree for Commonwealth of Nations. this nation has been in the game for a long time and can be developed. I will immediately suggest tech tree of destroyers, light cruisers, heavy cruisers and battleships. Tech tree features: Torpedoes with high burst damage and long range Low penetration of HE shells Low high speed Representatives: Premium ship In subsequent posts, I will make assumptions about the cruisers and battleships of the Сommonwealth. Also, if you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

HMS - Its royal vavy. Its British ships For Commonwealth Navies was HMAS, HMCS, HMZNS, INS and PNS ... they cannot be in commonwealth with the HMS prefix since the British ships had the HMS prefix regarding Almirante Latorre, aka HMS Canada, it cannot be attributed to the Commonwealth. If a similar ship was built and it served in Britain, it’s still possible, otherwise it was in a single copy, which was transferred to Chile in the futures And as i say early - HMAS Australia already in tech tree https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAS_Australia_(1911)

unfortunately 460 mm artillery is only for yamato. Of course, you can think of something that could suddenly replace Haku’s 457-mm artillery with 460 for more power, but this will not be of much use

The problem is that the French did offer destroyer leaders to Poland, and there was even a Le Fantasque project for Poland. Therefore, Mogador does not look directly supernatural to them. In the case of Pan-America, it is clear that the developers basically took what they bought Brooklyn-type cruisers, as well as the fact that before the Second World War, when the race for battleships began at Pan-America, US shipyards also offered their developments (as a result the Rivadavia class is just one of those, it was built by the same shipyard that launched such ships as Massachusetts, Wasp and Bunker Hill (Essex class)) In the case of the Commonwealth, here the ships were built according to a design provided by Britain, or the ships themselves were already provided by Britain. So, even if you look at the "what if", then there will be nothing from other countries, since they did not offer their ships to the Commonwealth countries. Rather, Lion could have been transferred to Australia or another country. There were cases of the transfer of Wickes and Clemson classes, but they were built in the 20s, and they were transferred before the start of World War II (1940s). So the United States would clearly not transfer any other ships to the Commonwealth

I know. In the CIS segment, I offered a more realistic Pan-America tech tree, but as we see, WG has its own vision. But I won't say it's all that bad. When I made a proposal for British battlecruisers there, one person wrote in the comments that he wanted Renown to the tier 7 in the configuration of 1944-45. As you can see, for the sake of prem, the developers have finalized the usual Renown

And? First ship call Australia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAS_Australia_(1911) also, if you are not aware, when ships were transferred to the Commonwealth, not all of them changed their names and since when is HMS Australia if it is HMAS Australia? All fleets had the prefix HMS, however, the names of their countries were inserted: HMAS - Her Majesty's Australian Ship HMCS - Her Majesty's Canadian Ship HMNZS - Her Majesty's New Zealand Ship Is that India and Pakistan stands out: INS - Indian Navy Ship PNS-Pakistan Navy Ship

they look like RN, because in the commonwealth of nations the UK holds the supremacy, and it was she who transferred her ships during the war and after, and not the USA. Projects were also offered by British shipyards (Vickers, Armstrong and others). So in any case there will be British ships here, and which of them will be placed is a mystery. Regarding HMAS Stuart, it is quite possible to put it on tier 4 instead of Vendetta

I same say, if constructive criticism - then even allowed. And so if "I don’t like it", "it’s not right for me", "i not what i want", so let them make a similar topic themselves and don’t tell what my proposal should be so that someone would like it

Earlier I made an assumption, what could be the destroyers of the tech tree of the Commonwealth of Nations. Here I will make a suggestion what could be the cruisers of the Commonwealth of Nations. Tech tree features: Up to level 6, light cruisers with 102, 152 and 133 mm caliber guns are presented, ballistics are mediocre, there are good torpedoes, starting from level 5, Crawling Smoke Generator and Hydroacoustic Search appear; Starting from level 6, the tech tree is divided into light and heavy cruisers; Both tech trees will have an impressive salvo weight, good detectability and powerful torpedoes; The good qualities of light cruisers include the presence of Specialized Repair Teams and Surveillance Radar, as well as powerful by the standards of the air defense class; Heavy cruisers also have Specialized Repair Teams, as well as good reloading for a caliber with an impressive number of guns; Representatives: In subsequent posts, I will make assumptions about the battleships of the Сommonwealth. Also, if you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

regarding "do not comment". This does not refer to constructive criticism, but to the fact that they say “oh, but I don’t like it, oh, why is it here, no one will see it anyway, stop posting this” and the like. For this is not the first post and more than once I have been written this. So, I immediately warned that they would not bring me and myself into conflict

You understand that if there is no appropriate confirmation, then there will be what is called "what if" in the game. That is, the ship is based on possible upgrades, the points of view of that country and subsequent upgrades. Then it will not be possible to call them existing ships, and it will be forbidden to give the name that they were given. Also, dismantling a torpedo tube is not easy to remove and put air defense there. It is necessary to remove the torpedo tube, remove the torpedo from the compartments, mount a rack for the air defense installation. They wouldn’t indulge in this, as in the case of a vampire 2 - they took it off, they took it off and they didn’t put it back.

Unfortunately, it is very difficult to limit a NOT project ship by the number of torpedoes (there will already be elfism at the Zara level)

Against the backdrop of all these superships, ships with an alternative firing mode, large and small cruisers, and so on, we forgot about such old tech tree, the crowns of which are Zao, Hindenburg, Des Moines. Here I want to offer a branch of Spain, without any newfangled lotions, without super huge or super small caliber, but just ordinary stable ships. Seeing Navara in the development blog, it became clear - Spain will be. Tech tree features: Good armor High firing range Up to tier 6, light cruisers with 152 mm main battery guns are presented, which have poor ballistics but a high rate of fire From tier 6 heavy cruisers with 203 mm artillery are introduced, with good ballistics and good rate of fire As on the Canarias, consumables are represented by hydroacoustic Search and engine boost 15% acceleration, at high levels there will be a spotting aircraft or catapult fighter to choose from, and a repair party Representatives: Premium ship This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

you want the opposite of the Japanese? The Japanese were released for long-range combat but with a low rate of fire, here you not only want rapid-fire long-range 170 mm main guns, with a breakdown of 54 mm and high DPM, but also excellent armor. P.S. Worcester loses to Des Moines just because of the penetration of a HE and the difference in rate of fire, which is not significant (4.6 seconds on Worcester vs 5.5 on Des Moines, this is not 3.8 seconds of shooting difference like Berlin and Hindenburg) Des Moines pierces 34 mm, which pierce the skin of all 32 mm battleships, against 30 mm, which barely pierce the skin of cruisers) Plus, in the presence of Inertia Fuse for HE Shells, Des Moines breaks through a 40 mm deck, which the Worcester cannot with its 38 mm

Then why are you comparing the light cruiser with the heavy cruiser tech tree? You want to comparing 12 guns of 203 mm with 51 mm pen (64 mm) who shoot every 9,8 seconds, and 12 guns with 6 sec reload and 43 mm pen (54 mm)? Damage 2500 vs 2100. Who will then strong? DPM on Hindenburg - 183 673 damage DPM on Berlin - 252 000

As i search and as i say Mainz can pen only 48 mm. Not 50. So look first in stats of ships, calculate or search on the Internet before saying so. You say that we got CA cruiser on germany and they not so strong, but they cant pen 50 mm deck. You want on long distance pen deck of whole battleships and some carriers?

How they can crossing much valued 50 mm? 1/4 of 150 mm (because germany cvl dont have another caliber) = 38 mm 38+25% = 48 mm. They cant pen deck of 50 mm. 170 mm = 43 mm 43 mm + 25%= 54 mm. That mean all deck of battleships will pen on long distance