TheKaramelka

today I will not make a suggestion for ships, today I will make a suggestion for reworking models. The parameters of the aircraft do not change, only the models change so that there is a logical sequence (because the Japanese, who have many carrier-based aircraft, placed prototypes of ground-based fighters as torpedo bombers, or the Americans have serial aircraft in stock, and in the top - experimental ones that were not even released party). American planes: Japanese planes: British planes: Germany planes: Soviet planes: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that developers will take it into account and make adjustments proposed by me to the game!  Thank you for your attention!

Here I will offer Spanish destroyers, as well as some premium ships (almost all of them are historical). The Spaniards were very interested in the French destroyer leaders of the Mogador type, as well as in the light cruisers Capitani Romani, on the basis of which they created their own such leaders. Tech tree features: As written above: the Spaniards were very interested in the French and Italians. In practice, we will get something similar to the French and Italians; Artillery destroyers with a good reload, and from level 6, you can find improved AP shells, with more damage than classmates, preferential ricochet angles, and short fuse timers; Torpedoes are quite slow, similar to Italian ones, with good range and mediocre damage; New сonsumables: smoke cloud - low emission time, long dispersion time, fast cooldown; Engine boost similar to Canarias - adds 15% to speed; The ships themselves are fast enough, but do not overtake the French; Representatives: Premiums ships: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

About lvl X - Kleber on project have only 2 torpedo launchers, but in the game he got 4. He was supplied with instead of air defense installations of 100 mm caliber. The same thing with Zara, she didnt even have in irl torpedo launchers, but in the game we got them

Since we have started to split the battleship branch into battlecruisers and battleships, we are talking about the United States as well. There are quite a lot of projects of early versions of Lexingtons and others and can be collected on a whole tech tree. Tech tree features: Starting from level 5, you can notice how the AP damage of the projectile is much less than that of classmates, due to its low weight, but at the same time it has increased armor penetration than classmates (for example, at level 10 Charlotte, the penitration on AP shells is: at 5 km it will be 814 mm, at 10 km 743 mm, at 15 km 645 mm, at 20 km 565 mm, for Slava this penitration is: 850, 747, 656 and 583 mm at respective distances); From level 6 you will get torpedo tubes, torpedoes are similar to destroyers; From level 8, similar to Constellation, Surveillance Radar will be available with a range of 10 km, and a duration of 30 seconds; As mentioned earlier, these are battlecruisers, which means, similarly to other battlecruisers, they have much better speed, but worse armor than battleships; They have good accuracy, high survivability, and much better ballistics than other representatives of this nation; Poor maneuverability; Good deck protection; Representatives: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Well, in general, Sun Yat-Sen will be in the game soon, so let's pretend that there will be a branch of Pan-Asia battleships Tech tree features: Long range snipers with excellent sigma and separate shell dispersion calculation; Weak armor, but good derectible, but poor mobility, and few hit points; There are few guns and the caliber is not high, but excellent reloading; Instead of 4 Repair party only 3; Representatives: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Well, still, judging by the photo, there was some kind of modernization. 1915: 1937:

Regarding all these ships - again, I have no idea if they could be in Asia (French and Italian in particular). As for Nagato, it's very possible that Fenyang was obtained in this way. As for HMS Malaya, there would definitely have to be a post-war modification, since after the First World War the ship still served in Britain, if it were transferred, it would rather be to remove the excess displacement for battleships presumably of the Lion type (for example)

Okay, what is your constructiveness? The fact that I do not want to incite conflict suitations, because of non-constructive criticism, which only states what people want to see for themselves, and not what the other person offers? In that case, why comment on it? Can you explain please? What is the logic to say what a person likes and what not to like while stubbornly proving his case and that the person who made the offer should bend over and say "yes" to someone else's opinion? If you do not give a detailed answer, what is the logic of persuading a person by creating a conflict situation, I will regard this as a conclusion to a conflict situation and will be forced to file a complaint against your message

Well, firstly, if you have not read, then it is clear why such a judgment. I pointed out that I do not support NOT constructive criticism, like if they write "I don't like it this way", "it shouldn't be like that because I don't want it" and so on. If there is constructive and logical criticism that contains specifics, please, as, for example, in the last post they expressed an opinion regarding the radar. Secondly, regarding the ships, do you think Rahmat, Jinan, Dalian, Sun Yat-Sen and others are especially historical? Here are the ships of the same nations that I presented: the USSR, Britain and the USA. Idk about french ships for Asia first, second, dont forget that Montana - its project, like Ohio. This is like a Ohio one variant of Montana, with 8 406 mm gun.

The question then is why do they write non-constructive criticism that a particular person does not like something? And at the same time, he will try hard to prove that personally my proposal, which I wanted to make, is not correct, and it should not be like that, and I must stop it. This infringement of the rights on the forum about the publication of posts and also creates a conflict that is also prohibited on the forum. Question - is it necessary? Not? Then I immediately warn if a person does not like my posts - let him not comment so as not to create a similar situation, do you still have questions?

Already in the European tech tree. Now its Tatra (DD Tier 2) and Viribus Unitis (BB Tier 5)

Since we are talking about battlecruisers, let's talk about France. They also had their own projects, but there are fewer of them than other countries (but Japan also had such projects of light cruisers that we didnt have) Tech tree features: There is an Main Battery Reload Booster from the 8th level; Numerous rapid-fire secondary artillery present; Not a high firing range, but the guns are quite accurate; If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

First of all, there must be relevance. Secondly, the results of the naval battles of the First World War, as well as the Washington Naval Agreement of 1922, interrupted the evolution of battlecruisers. Later progress in the field of power led to the merging of battlecruisers and battleships into a single class of fast battleships. As you can see, the Alaska class is more of a large cruiser than a battleship. This branch is battleships (like the Schlieffen and St.Vincent tech tree's)

Guam have too small caliber for BB tier X. Look, we got 12 406 mm guns on Tier 9, and then 9 305 mm at Tier 10?

Well: 1. Like we see at statistics, Constellation not super power to be honest, but he have radar, i dont think that it will be very bad thing for this tech tree; 2. Well lets see: we have normal armor it plating (not like St.Vincent 25 mm), and we got much more hp then Schlieffen and St.Vincent. As for battlecruiser, this survival rate is at a decent level. About speed: dont forget that 35 kts - its the best speed of all bb. Schlieffen - 34,1 kts, Incomparable - 33 kts, St.Vincent - 32,5 kts.

When Hakuryu got another models on secondary?

Today i wanna propose the second tech tree of British destroyers. Tech tree features A tech tree of artillery destroyers with large numbers of rapid-fire artillery; Starting from level 8, guns have 1/4 instead of 1/6 HE shell penetration; Torpedoes dont stand out for high range or speed, but do have high damage; Like the main tech tree, there is a Short-Burst Smoke Generator and Hydroacoustic Search; If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!

Well if they buff his secondary for 7,3 km, then it will good. But Sekiryu is coming....

its very bad - slow attack aircraft and 8 in squadron when everyone got 9, bad torpedo damage with not high speed, and VERY random bombs. Yeah there good speed of torpedo bombers and dive bombers and good secondary, but the detectability of ship didnt give you to realize this secondary

After publishing in the DevBlog about European destroyers, the question becomes: where is their cruiser tech tree line? Even Pan-America has already received, but here - no. Here we will consider what it can actually be. Tech tree features: Ships have a high firing range Rapid fire artillery with excellent ballistics (shells fly fast) Missing HE shells like British cruisers AP projectiles have increased penetration at a distance Available engine boost, repair party, hydroacoustic search Representatives: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!

Look more in devblog because you're not looking as far as you should. The USA really designed the ship for the USSR, but the Soviet Union abandoned it, which is why the USA considered this project as well, but like the USSR abandoned it Greece didn't have such a large fleet, and Portugal too (Elli is from Greece here)

I know about OPR Dragon. And I thought to put it there. But you want a third Danae in the game? I don't see another Duguay-Trouin yet

I didnt buffed like that. He how was 1x3+2x2 and so it remained

The highest at level 9 and 10 is the Tre Kronor class, there are no more applicants. And regarding Gotland - in Sweden such a ship could not be built due to the limited size of the shipyards (the largest ship that could be built would be Tre Kronor). Therefore, they could well have placed an order for the construction of a cruiser hull, since all the same, all weapons were produced by the Swiss company Bofors: 40, 57 and 152 mm

After the release of Pan-America light cruisers in the devblog, it becomes clear that destroyers are just around the corner. So let's take a look at what they might be. Tech tree features: The ships have fast-firing and accurate artillery with fairly good ballistics and a decent (by destroyer standards) firing range. Torpedoes have a relatively short range. Starting from level 8, the number of torpedoes becomes small. Air defense is very good, no worse, or even better than that of Europeans Surveillance Radar appears from level 8 Repair party available but no Smoke Generator South Americans do not shine with speed Representatives: Premium ships: If you don't like my posts, PLEASE don't comment them, don't bring yourself and me into conflict. This is my personal proposal and not the fact that ships will ever appear in the game or my concept will be taken into attention!  Thank you for your attention!