Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Telenti_Ayanbanda

Players
  • Content Сount

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7868

About Telenti_Ayanbanda

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Telenti_Ayanbanda

    SCHLIEFFEN SHAME

    Right now it's my only BB (Schlieffen) I speak about my little experience When i have a Kremlin, maybe i´ll never play whith Schlieffen, or maybe i´ll play better, or..... This is my current request to the WOWS team
  2. Telenti_Ayanbanda

    SCHLIEFFEN SHAME

    I agree that one should not be able to choose the best main guns with the best secondaries, etc,,,, What I claim is to be able to choose below my supposed super AP-cannons, and to be able to put the supposedly inferior ones of a cruiser. According to WOWS standards it shouldn't be a problem, unless there is something hidden, and not obvious. I think it would show that the supposed Schlieffen super power is not so great, in this case speaking of the Schlieffen AP-cannons!!!. If WOWS allows me to try this configuration I promise to share my experiences. . Regards
  3. Telenti_Ayanbanda

    SCHLIEFFEN SHAME

    Joke!!!¿?. What Joke? I'm sure that a Schlieffen with main guns (and their rate of fire, and their dispersion, and their damage, etc...), from just my Hindenburg, or better with the same that Stalingrad, I could do much more damage than with the guns current. I would like to test this hypothesis. I think there is a basic problem that WoWs has, and it will be revealed with this update. We would have BB's with the resistance and life of a BB. but with the ability to kill DD's much more easily and of course duels with other cruisers and too BB's. I am about to try this configuration, in fact it is only giving the possibility of changing caliber by rate of fire fundamentally and in the middle there will be a point of maximum effectiveness depending on the battle situations. I'd like to try it. Regards
  4. Telenti_Ayanbanda

    SCHLIEFFEN SHAME

    I just played again against a Russian TIER X cruiser. There are two that my Schlieffen continually loses in duels with, either close (they do a lot of citadels to me), or far away (each bullet is incredible damage). The Staligrad, and the Petropavlovsk. The thing is, I thought that a Battleship could never lose just 2-3 minutes against a cruiser. It is in my opinion the world upside down. Well, as I consider it a shame, I claim in this forum, that WOWS allow me to mount the guns of these cruisers on my Schlieffen, I also settle for any other cruiser, but with these that have guns that do more damage than those of my Schlieffen ( due to its low rate of fire+dispersion+bad ballistics,+...), well I guess WOWS programmers won't have any problems, because in my Schlieffen these guns fit perfectly on the deck. Please deign to contact me so I can make this configuration. On the other hand, I take the opportunity to denounce that on average any normal BB (any) does an average of 3,000 dmg per AP on my ship, and my damage is an average of 1,000 dmg. of madia. Another embarrassment not justified by the Schlieffen's secondaries or torpedoes. It doesn't compensate. Please someone explain to me the inconsistency of my butter AP. Regards
×