Zander_Zone

Hhm interesting discussion. My view is that random is random ie for fun and not to be taken too seriously. And serious starts with ranked battles or clan battles. I understand that losing because of others playing bad is dissapointing, and I have been both on the recieving end and giving end of it ;-) The problem with PR is that its not WG; the issue with win rate is that the avg only says so much, and the recent past is showing a players development. If a player comes from 46% to 48% and the trend is clearly showing a recent >50% WR, I would not mind having that guy/gal on my team, especially in a ship that he is good in .

What a mess WG has created with Subs! Just played my first Random against Subs with my Fletcher - nightmare. WG, please take Subs out of randoms again! Radar I can deal with, CVs are annoying, but being spotted out of nowhere by a sub and nothing you can to is too much for me. It just forces more camping in the back, which is not for me. I prefer BBs, CAs, and DDs; I can live with the occasional CV. So I have decided to no longer play World of Warships for a while, the game I played almost ever day in the past. So if you are interested in why you have lost me as a player (and customer) = subs in random. Not sure if WG is interested in my feedback and I usually dont do posts, but just felt fair to me as I otherwise think the game was pretty good. Over and out. PS: or to be a bit constructive: WG, why dont you create two random battle-types, one with all classes, and one without subs and cvs - Should be easy to implement and then players could chose and you wouldnt upset those that feel very strongly about one of the two most controversial classes, sub & CV?