Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

totally_potato

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,533
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

Everything posted by totally_potato

  1. totally_potato

    Stop Nerf CV's

    Stop nerf CVs is hilarious Stop reporting CVs tho is a whole different matter. Its like you can't be rich coz others don't want to be. The arguments against that were wrong, and irl examples taken to support the argument against it were hilarious Next thread is, stop saying CVs are OP coz they are only one per team
  2. totally_potato

    Stop Nerf CV's

    eh what was the point of quoting me here?
  3. totally_potato

    New German Destroyers Review

    That is cap. Normal DDs have about 100m disp at 12km, these DDs have about 50m. That's half the disp. It makes so much of a Difference. I suggest playing these DDs first before saying that If you are the lone DD in your team yes. But you can go to a different area of the map and do that role. If your are the only DD on one flank (its quite rare actually, its often 4 or so DDs per team), it can be a problem in domination, but most of the time, the DD is going to come after you, coz ez target. Then you can bait him to shoot you, and the rest of your team will delete him from the server. And if you are outnumbered on your flank, or outgunned, you can always play the defending role. Khaba was not popular before the rework and buff, but now she is quite common. She ain't smaland popular, but she is popular. May I know, where you found this written? If you do find a DD, you can fire at him. In fact the only place where I don't notice the difference is about 4km or less. At long range duels in particular these guns are quite powerful. The HE wrecks modules and does about 2k dmg that DDs struggle to do at those ranges. The AP wrecks them if they angle. You can argue, on paper the DPM is quite low, but it is applied very well, and that was always a characteristic of ze Germans (except for their BBs). Their dmg might not be the highest, but they definitely make up for it by applying it well.
  4. totally_potato

    Is PT worth it anymore?

    Nice As for me, I use it on pretty much all my cruiser builds, very few DD builds Rest of the ships, I take something else. For BBs, if non-italian and non-German or non -russian, GtG. For Russians, I take PT, for Germans, I take IFHE or Vigilance or Consumable enhancements, on Italians, I take Consumable enhancements
  5. totally_potato

    Is PT worth it anymore?

    nah. I can answer the question. PT means priority target What's your take on this?
  6. totally_potato

    WG is time to make a 5th class

    sub classes need to exist like Super cruisers, Battlecruisers, Super battleships, Heavy DDs/DD leader, Mini cruiser, etc.
  7. totally_potato

    Constellation in the Armory

    Austin, Anchorage Also every ship has atleast one torp
  8. totally_potato

    O dear god they buffed the Dutch airstrike

    Ise doesn't suck She is fairly balanced. Her planes resto cd isn't even that long. Its 2 minutes. Point is to use both simultaneously against the guy you are fighting and not to rely on either
  9. totally_potato

    O dear god they buffed the Dutch airstrike

    he finds them boring
  10. totally_potato

    Just no (Submarines)

    Many ppl on twitter keep asking for subs so yeah
  11. totally_potato

    Marco Polo. Any buff on the horizon?

    Pepega players doesn't mean they don't have no situational awareness. Exactly. Finally my man understood what I do Not quite. You just spam torps from long range. And I do use my guns sometimes early game to take out low HP ships, or the ones who are charging me. Me neither. She was defenitly one of those ships that was, as one would say, overhyped. Just like today's constellation.
  12. totally_potato

    O dear god they buffed the Dutch airstrike

    The Ig you haven't seen PQ in a while. Now he prefers DDs and many cruisers more. And he now kinda hates BBs Wrong examples. Wrong statement. Having planes that can go anywhere in the map and deal dmg, can spot ships, is definitely good game impact. All CVs have a lot of impact on the game. RN CVs damage isnt impactful. WOuld agree with GZ, but def not with MvR Lemme tell you, coz you are wrong, not coz I say so
  13. totally_potato

    More nerfs to RN CL line

    mostly the players. I have met many new players, who just looked at the UK CL line saw no HE and explosion and spat on it.
  14. Oh wow You can't leave a pixelated game even if its trash, but you can leave the one who could be your future partner, if she was that bad So romantic I tell you, so romantic
  15. totally_potato

    Constellation in the Armory

    T7 probably
  16. totally_potato

    Andrew Cunningham on british battleships

    ERS if you care about getting that heal back faster Gun feeder if you want to actually use both ammo and not spam HE like a jackass GL
  17. totally_potato

    Constellation in the Armory

    and yet they do well when they do what they were designed to do
  18. totally_potato

    Constellation in the Armory

    another TLDR She is a Colorado with legs (fast speed), eyes (radar), a bit of farting power (back position torps), but she is a pussy (bad armor but decent conceal). She definitely worked in the gym for a while
  19. totally_potato

    Constellation in the Armory

    Sorry I have stopped making any purchases through dubs. But based on game footage of many ppl including Carbine Carlito This is the TLDR She is a BC. SO she has reduced armor for more speed. She has a lot of utility through radar. She has torps that can act as area denial. Overall looks like a decent package. But I need to stop dumping money into the game.
  20. totally_potato

    Just no (Submarines)

    Random player: Just no WG: Did we ask you?? That's basically what they say. There no point anymore in making these threads, coz WG just doesn't give a crap
  21. totally_potato

    Update 0.10.6, balance changes

    its not too much, but it was quite unnecessary. If there was one thing about Jervis I would nerf, its defenitly not the conceal. I'd probably her reload a bit. Like 0.1 or something like that.
  22. totally_potato

    Update 0.10.6, balance changes

    Monarch isn't cancer so I don't mind that
  23. totally_potato

    Marco Polo. Any buff on the horizon?

    Yes, but those ninja one strikes, happen so damn rarely in other DDs. So it doesn't really matter. Le me rephrase that for you. They torpedo spam, take control of the enemy, if its clear, and then they fire at enemy DDs. Remember, when taking caps, there will more than just a single DD shooting at you. And your HP pool is one of the lowest among DDs. Yes you can damage that enemy DD, but that's a very good way to lose a lot of HP, HP that you will need so much in the endgame. I mean the ship already has a 2 second reload on albeit mediocre guns. That's definitely not worth building into. I did tho try a gunbuild once, and well, with all the Klebers, and Marceaus roaming at the time, and at that time, the number of cruisers played, let's just say I was disappointed. I have found more success with the torp build. Yes the gun reload was stupidly fast, but 1 heal was nowhere near enough to sustain me in gunfights vs actual gunboat DDs. And if you want a DD hunter, there are way better choices. Daring is an amazing DD hunter, has the same conceal, heal, a slightly slower reload for two more guns, and smoke, as well as hydro. Halland is basically a handicapped daring in the whole DD hunting aspect. Not to mention Halland has a fair bit of freeboard to hit and its quite thick. If you play Halland you definitely play for the torps not the guns. That is my opinion, but an opinion that has given me more success. NA BB captains are also quite pepega, so you get the idea. Which the EU DDs are exceptionally good at.
  24. totally_potato

    O dear god they buffed the Dutch airstrike

    I don't agree with that tbh. Yess they do have rather low HP, but a well played MvR knows that its planes are fairly survivable if heal and speed is utilised. The torpedoes aren't weak. Their target is different. Its not BBs, its lighter and maneuverable targets like Light cruisers or destroyers and they are rather good against them. Bombs aren't actually too unreliable, if you think where you should have gotten 3 cits, you get 1 or 2. That's the general nature of AP bombs and the fact that the damage isn't constantly consistent is nice to see. 1 or two cits per strike is fine. And its still strikes hard. Rockets are still great The problem with MvR is that it doesn't have the braindead skill floor for the average CV player. You actually need to use the gigantic mega sized brain of yours to take hits for yo......I mean think about the strikes, the angle at which you will drop, you're influence on the battle becoz AP does encourage repositioning and not in the best way always. Like you could attack from an angle where if cruiser angles to you, the rest of your team can delete it and crap like that. MvR is a really good CV even today, despite the nerfs it has gotten.
  25. totally_potato

    ST 0.10.6, changes to test ships

    Don't quote me on that They said its designed to dominate caps. And her HE is high alpha with a good reload, so she will work. Its nice to have DDs that don't utterly outgun everything. I am bored of that crap
×