totally_potato

def Although I will say that I have reset the captain skills, coz I am trying new crap out Currently these BB builds are fixed German BB build High tier ranked Italian build Conqueror build Standard BB build etc I have more builds for DDs and cruisers P.S Ik the Conq build looks weird, but its been kinda different and cool at the same time, and considering how little time I play the Conq, it might be a unique approach to play her a bit more close in

except the the German DD line was actually quite good. Z-31 was crap, but the rest were alright

I am thoroughly disappointed

you accidently farted?

Understandable, have a great day

why not 8km torps and and proper secondaries? Maybe Siegfried like accuracy on main guns but siegfried like armor instead of Bismarck like armor?

it was a really good read, honestly But I had something to clarify regarding these ships. Another 18 inch gun BB is starting to become to excessive. It should have been a rarity but now atleast half of the T10 BBs have 18 inch guns. And WG's goal here was to bring SAP to all classes of the italians with a few exceptions like Napoli, this new Giuseppe Verdi, etc etc. So having a large number of low caliber guns is refreshing imho, combined with SAP. Also SAP was given 1/10th dmg becoz it was probably broken vs DDs. And it still does more damage than AP overpenetration damage, which adds up. I would maybe put a 20% damage cap, but I haven't tested crap, so Idk. Fuel smoke on F.C is not a bad idea btw. And I think I remember WG stating that T3 BBs is not worth the effort or something, hence they didn't put one for the Italians. Last but not least, all these ships are basis or representation of said ships in game. They aren't 100% historically accurate, except some minor cases like Yamato. I love the Italian BB like tbh. Its a good line imho, and one I needed. All of them are decent-good ships tier for tier, all of them are unique, and they keep the theme of mid to close range first line BB engagement concept alive. And that's all I need. If there was one thing I could change about this line, I would maybe give the secondaries SAP and make it have the same range as the french and Germans, in order to keep the whole concept alive. I might even prefer them to have slightly better concealment on 8-10. That's about it.

except Pommern has way worser reload and less guns

........actually, wtf? Did WG say this, or is this fake, or another fake assurance?

so right in the second part of Soviet CVs you are adding German BCs? Sounds very SUBspicious. Aren't you rushing it a bit. Content looks nice and all tho. But German BCs maybe need a bit more balancing, especially the T8 and T9 need a slight speed increase. And Brandy needs a bit more HP

Russian dev hell, rotting enough to get angry enough to be OP af

The British BB looks interesting. 16 fast reloading guns with crap sigma? hmm. No special gimmicks apart from that I suppose. The italian T9. So a better Marco Polo? Why don't you just give Marco Polo very accurate SAP secs ffs?

Kremlin was never a secondary ship and CC has a different approach to secondaries aka its objective is setting more fires than raw damage, becoz it can't set fires with the main guns but deal very high alpha instead

tf does that mean? Interesting yeah plus more range Personally out of my own experience and everyone's opinion here, I'll go with Gearing The combination of decent handling, good knife fighting potential, and long range torp power, makes me wanna go out for a few Gearing mains. Plus all those missions. Thnx y'all for the (forbidden word) feedback

sweet. I'll go for gearing today evening then (coz y'all took a lot of time answering this) Also LU Kleber is a poor man's Paolo Emilio. It has to be the best no Kapp

the Italians also have a bunch of 152mm guns that do dmg to DDs and superstructures and their RoF is decent So in regards to that I said what I did. And american secs, hit the superstructure and they also hit the deck too as well as belts of BBs and cruisers. Against DDs some secs of the Italians still do good dmg to them. However for American secs, its high accuracy and high RoF makes it a good fire starter, and for Itas, the combination of slower firing high fire chance guns and a ton of low caliber low fire chance but high RoF guns makes it a varied and good fire starter

ASW build on a ship that doesn't have ASW? Genius Jokes aside, your mods are wrong For a proper secondary build I suggest This is pretty much my GK build minus the hydro mod and reload mod for accuracy mod instead. Its a good build imho coz you get a good amount of tank skills in like FP, extra heal duration and charge, and well as probability reduction, a bit of fire duration reduction (you can sacrifice AR for BoS if you want), as well as secondaries and main battery accuracy. Plus good torp protection and a bit more warning makes her a powerful mid to close range ship while remaining consistent at long ranges. I love this BB for a reason

so what should I go for?

I have insane foresight I asked which is the better torp boat not gunboat

still prefer the camos of the first collab Those just brought all my nostalgia back in one giant swoop

Nope If that was the case, Missouri would be awesome af All that aside Missouri basically has 5 Gearing turrets stuck to each side and they don't have good accuracy at all Outside the secondary americans, the only sec BB that one can consider going secs for Montana coz she has a ton of fire chance. That's it

Some random sailor's fat captain?

it definitly is If they are creating new OPs. However, old ops that have been taken away are being brought back Let's wait and watch