mns_2_tuga64

No Comments

Statistics and more statistics, I have no idea where you're going to get all this, I don't even see what it proves but anyway. One thing I always do is play to try to help my team and I don't spend my life hiding behind rocks waiting for my teammates to die. One day maybe you want to explain how you are so good at playing, maybe I should go check your stats, which I will never do either as someone said in this post this is an arcade game I thought it was a strategy game and that everyone contributed to the victory was wrong. Continuation of good games.

I considered not responding to your statements. But the images I put in the post were from a game in which I scored 184,000 points (and that's all) and not the 250 points of that game in which we crossed paths. The images were really just to respond to your first post. And they will only serve to answer these statements of yours: "Today i met this player in a game. He was awful and extrem toxic/dumb. He was going to cap with Shimikaze. Enemy had Elbing and Des Moines with radar. My teammate warned him but he didn't listend (pic1). After he was radared in his useless smoke DesMoines and Elbing killed him very fast. He was screaming for help but we couldnt and he died within 10 seconds (pic2). Then he stayed in the game and was harrasing everone else in his team until game was over. We won this game by the way. He only made 250points and was by far the worst player in this game. He still hasn't understood the game and he never will. Look at his winrate. He will attack you instantly verbally if you will try to tell him his mistakes." As for not understanding the game, everyone speaks for themselves.

Thanks The reason why the answer doesn't look well written is that my language is Portuguese, if I wrote in my language he wouldn't understand anything. Taking advantage of this message, I will also reply to the following one and it is a very simple tier 10 game to prevent tier 6 players from confronting tier 8 ships, which seems to me to be quite uneven. And answering the one who didn't know how to accept my apologies, I would like to see him play without a minimap and without rocks scattered everywhere, unfortunately the ocean map appears 4 times in a year it's a shame. I will put the original text below. Obrigado A razão porque a resposta não parece bem escrita é que a minha língua é português, se eu escrevesse na minha língua ele não entenderia nada. Aproveitando esta mensagem respondo também á seguinte e é muito simples jogo tier 10 para evitar que quem joga tier 6 confronte navios tier 8 o que me parece bastante desigual. E respondendo aquele que não soube aceitar as minhas desculpas gostaria do ver jogar sem minimap e sem rochas espalhadas por todo lado, infelizmente o map ocean aparece 4 vezes num ano é uma pena. vou colocar o texto original abaixo.

I have no idea how you saved those dialogues in that game but I said that it was a crap team in my language, I need to show you how that game ended, but I can show here that sometimes it ends well and I contribute to the victory, and if you feel offended you my apologies but many losses in a row hurts.

In 8 matches I played with 32 different teammates against 40 different opponents and is it always my fault? Something has to be wrong and it shouldn't just be this player but anyway.

In 8 matches I played with 32 different teammates against 40 different opponents and is it always my fault? Something has to be wrong and it shouldn't just be this player but anyway.

is it possible to explain which missions or objectives are to be accomplished to unlock this ship is that the game could allow, by hovering the mouse over the padlock, to show the missions to be accomplished. for this and any topic in the game would be quite positive. thanks

thx obrigado "various activities" = auction lol

just a rant, as long as this balance in MM is not changed this game will always be poor

but now it's in the tech tree, and it says you can get it by completing certain missions or objectives, which ones?

not that they only give me teamates that win 2 or 3 previous matches, and by the way I can assure you that I never had 5 wins in a row, which is also strange because situations like this have happened to me several times

Just to show you how MM plays balanced games and tries to make sure that whoever loses the next game in a slightly stronger team...hmmm I forgot the MM doesn't care if they are noobs or pros it matters is they pay anything from time to time .

Another beautiful example of the famous MM. Balanced as always.

Sorry to come back to this subject but this MM sucks. I know I play badly. I mean defeats on defeats this is not just the player's fault, this game is spraying itself on the way it organizes the matches as long as the ships are of the same class the rest is crap.

See this as unbalanced match poor MM

sorry google translation im portuguese

Maybe you're right but if you come to play Tier 6 you can always find tier 8 and where is the balance there? if you play tier 10 no one plays above. and for me the problem is not the ships but the game mechanics that ignore the ratio of the players. It would be preferable to take another 30 seconds to form the teams and make them more balanced, taking into account the player's level. There's so much more to say about this, it's a shame that such a captivating game is at the same time so weak in some ways, in this case greed takes precedence over other things. And believe the defeats were all followed without any victory in between.

Maybe you're right but if you come to play Tier 6 you can always find tier 8 and where is the balance there? if you play tier 10 no one plays above. and for me the problem is not the ships but the game mechanics that ignore the ratio of the players. It would be preferable to take another 30 seconds to form the teams and make them more balanced, taking into account the player's level. There's so much more to say about this, it's a shame that such a captivating game is at the same time so weak in some ways, in this case greed takes precedence over other things. And believe the defeats were all followed without any victory in between.

Is this the famous balance of players in matches? I think I could have played all night and I couldn't get a win with this boat. It's asking for a lot of balance between players, I know that I play badly that I can't aim accurately so in tropds it's better not to mention the crosshair says to point to a position and the ships all run away from that position, the best thing is to do the opposite of what the crosshair says to do. Is it really that hard to create more balanced matches more "noobs vs noobs" or "pros vs pros" and less "pros vs noobs"?

Well values in percentage terms are always dangerous to evaluate and following your criteria let's see the numbers: 15000 matches - 51.91% wins 7786 5000 matches - 51.26% wins 2563 Seen in this way, the 5K player hasn't even played between wins and losses as many games as the 15K player's wins, he still has 1/3 of games left. But maybe instead of counting the number of matches the aim rate of each player and in a game where aiming is something that leaves a lot to be desired then at the level of tropds where the automatic aim says one thing and when you trust it the result is often 0 (zero) hits, maybe at this point there would be something to review in the game mechanics.It's like allowing matches between tier 8 vs tier 10 ships and in Random this happens a lot.

You're right, really someone who has played almost 25K games must be hard to find many who have done so and are still active in the game. But one thing is for sure that I enjoy playing against someone who only made 1K or 2K, or playing against 23K or 24K opponents, it seems to me that it would make more sense. I think the game improved a lot and here I go back to the initial question if the matches, for example, could only happen between players with 1k matches between them, it could be a criterion just like the tier ship. Right?

I don't understand this is a 12 vs 12 team game and is one player going to make a difference? And when you look at your team and 3 BBs have already been destroyed, you think it's a DD that will make the difference. Not to mention the aim that the game indicates as a likely impact location for your tropds, not wanting to offend anything or anyone is ridiculous, as well as the mini-map is like having a satellite in 1945 in my point of view if they wanted to improve the game removes the mini-map, or at least allows the player to make that choice.

I wish I could agree with you but yesterday I only played (ranked battles) more than 20 matches and contrary to what you say in more than 20, I won 3 which clearly does not represent an attempt to balance within the game, in fact, I can even say that even before the match starts I can tell you who will win. Just look at the type of badges that each player has and with more or less difficulty we know who will win, it doesn't always happen like that, I would say 90% of the time. That's why I say the MM game shouldn't allow someone with 15000 games to play against someone with 3 or 4000 and that's what I would call a balance. There would be more to say about MM but as I was silenced in the game chat I came here to say what I think. And I want to add one more thing I have already read here on the forums, one of the developers saying that one of his concerns is precisely the MM trying not to unbalance the teams too much.

That's not saying true because the creators say they're trying to avoid precisely that. Not to create this situation of 5, 6 or more consecutive defeats. And if skills were the first criterion for making sure you would only play pros which I think you might find much more interesting than finishing a match 12-0 right? Or do you prefer to win against those who play less and with that say that you are very good? By the way, what is RNG?