Aethervoxx

... you mean you don't like the 'barf' on offer here ....?

There isn't any (other than, probably, inducing players to spend money).

It is simply the MM not being random, not even close.

This post topic ,hopefully, will be solely about the below surface play of the Subs. < most appropriate emoji (I think)

(double post)

My wallet has been closed since the farce known as the CV rework happened.

How could the Imperial War Museum Group get so badly 'suckered'? WoWS is not even a reputable/respectable simulation - it's a commercial arcade gaming company (with some, apparently, really questionable business practices).

We'll see if WoWS is even around in a few more years, let alone fourteen more. Modern doesn't necessarily mean successful (again, another subjective perception depending on what you are referring to)

Vote with ones fingers. Either get it (however it's offered) or don't get it (lol, there's a double meaning there, lol). Me? I won't be getting it (darn, there's that double meaning again).

I'm strictly a Desktop computer gamer. I do not play PS or any other console type brand of game. Fyi, I'm of the boomer board gamer generation .

It's relative Pete. If you did your homework before trying to increase your post count you'd have discovered EQ is 20 years old. Thus WoW is newer. Then there is the observation that EQ used/uses a more traditional look in its art rather than the art style of WoW which could also be considered new/newish/newer (more suited to 'juvenile' tastes). &, Pete, one more point. What is considered 'old school' is all in the perception of the individual. I think EQ is old school & I think WoW is new school. Touche

Incorrect. WoW is new school compared to the real 'older' school (for that genre) of EQ (which I might add is still going - up to 27 expansions, I believe).

How creative, El2aZeR, recycling an image/meme to represent WG itself.

I find this below surface play much more difficult to learn than surface play. I'd like to see some keys (perhaps J, K & L) to click that would set the Sub at a specific below surface depth, eg: Deep, Mid-depth or Shallow (all being below periscope depth ofc). In regard to the U-69, I find it disappointing that it can only dive to 40m yet it's description says it was far superior in deep diving ability than any other Sub (at it's time).

The first(?) involuntary one bites the dust.

You forgot the option of "I'm not buying it at all for any form of payment" therefore I cannot vote .

Octavian must be hiding in a Sub that is escaping from a WoWS map (the one with the shiny WG HQ on it). Can we get a map with Cyprus on it, please? After all, he once proclaimed there will never be Subs in WoWS. Perfect ruse - no one will suspect he's on something that no one expected in the game.

There is no problem with the auto-pilot if utilized correctly. I simply use auto-pilot with 1 way point and re-enter auto-pilot whenever it's necessary to move my CV further. This isn't difficult at all (well, maybe, for 'some' it is, rofl)

I'm by no means, mtm78, a 'yup' man. Check my posts & you'll see this. I hate reworked CVs. I love (loved) the RTS CVs. Do I like the Subs (as offered atm)? Not completely, but I'm in the camp that believes both CVs & Subs should be in a 20th century naval battle game (whether arcade or simulation).

I've never used CV auto-pilot even when CVs were RTS style. Battle situations change so manual CV movement is necessary (I only use 1 way point at a time in current iteration). &, btw, I almost always have my CV on the move (unlike the behind the island camper or the edge of the map camper CV failure players).

I won't be hiding. I play randoms almost exclusively. Subs are coming whether you & the rest of the Sub naysayers are against them. < Sub emoji

Agreed, CVs should stay, just not the reworked ones.

What else have you ferreted out? Surely, there's a T6 & T8 Ru Sub. What about the Brits? C'mon, spill the beans. < a 'sub' emoji

Looks good? Perhaps. The problem is the 'ugly' paywall (however minor that might be).

You didn't ... butt .... you 'did' (& 'that' is on you ).