Aethervoxx

... well ... this picture - it looks like the Huang He has toon eyes & resembles an angry 'Theodore Tugboat' toon (a Cdn CBC produced childrens show (hosted by one of the Mommas & the Poppas singers - a good show, btw) .

This is common knowledge from when it was stated by WG. You joined in July, 2015 which is sufficient for you to have seen the history of WoWS. I do not make things like this up. Too bad you either never saw the admission, are unaware of that or, perhaps, your memory is selective? Knowing you, I'll go with your 'selective memory'. Ask others. There are references from WG that the MM is not truly random - never was, nor never will be (it's part of their patent). Is it everyone but you who doesn't realize this - or are you still in denial?

Ranked is quite 'rank' so I opine the name is appropriate.

It will be T6 minimum for Sub Seal Clubbing (the giving end, that is). Note how Subs are the same even tier fail that the reworked CVs are. It's like WF (pardon me, WG) only wants to do half the work required (by not adding the odd tiers).

I only have three T10s so I'll take whatever baubles I get. As these SCs are free & will be numerous (I'm sure there are many T10 ships out there), I doubt many exceptional SCs will appear.

Choosing the type of container reward is fine. I prefer non-credit containing containers as credits are so easy to accumulate. Some signal flags or resources containers are more useful, imho.

My comment was directed at your 'redirection' & TY for the compliment. One of us has to be sharp ( 'dicing your 'poast').

I thought this topic was about 'Lootboxes 2.0' (& whatever may be going on with container rewards) Usually, persons who redirect the discussion onto a completely different topic do this as they have no valid point to make and are simply being argumentative for arguments sake.

Another denier of the obvious ( & WG admitted the MM is not truly random - this was stated years ago). So you swallow whatever Jones style Kool-aid it is you are drinking.

.... I guess they are putting AI (faulty AI) in to these newer versions of 'poaster' appliances ....

Yes, however, I have two points to make about how WoWS depicts ports. 1) I'd prefer that we get to see all the ports WoWS has created (not just the ones currently on offer) & to be able to choose from the full list. 2) It sure would be nice if one could choose for each ship in your port screen whichever port background you wanted - that way you'd get to see lots of ports there. As to Rotterdam port itself - I'm not that thrilled with it - tho I would use it for my solo Du Cruiser - in my case the Gelderland (I have no interest in the latest WoWS fantasy/gimmick tech tree line)

this fish recognizes your 'bait' (& go figure it out for yourself)

What's that competition where they keep lowing the bar & you have to ankle crawl under it? Limbo? Isn't WG the reigning champion atm?

'famus'?

....more 'burnt poast' ....

Who is that? I don't see anyone in a clan named 'Team Minions' here? Would you care to point them out to us? Now if you are referring to 'Team Minnow' or 'Team Sardines', I'm sure we can propose candidates (you?) for those anonymous clans.

Posters have to 'poast' & there's a lot of 'burnt poast' coming out of that particular appliance. Really? I suppose you haven't yet encountered (nor contradicted anyone?) who refers to 'loot boxes'? (or has that particular mouse escaped your cat senses?)

I'm not quitting (yet) although I can commiserate completely with those who have. it's all regrettable as WoWS before the farce CV rework was an enjoyable experience. Since then all that has happened is WoWS (as a great game) has progressively gotten worse.

It better be 'Win 15 battles in a row' or I'm not interested.

Both. Hilarious for them & tragic for us.

I don't think Subs have killed Ranked but the questionable MM certainly has inflicted grievous wounds there. At least, it's humans on both sides (unlike the barf co-op Sub mode) fighting with Subs so the data in Ranked will be useful (somewhat useful, that is).

You got this part correct - the 'pretending'. I suppose you could call them a 'games company' as in they are 'gaming' their customer base.

I'm for as much historical realism as possible so manual torps only. However, the Subs would require more stealth ability in recompense.

When it comes to money .... they are getting too much of what they don't deserve.

The only solution to the reworked CV disaster is to dump the whole concept & return the RTS CV play.