Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Aethervoxx

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    13191
  • Clan

    [G-O-M]

Everything posted by Aethervoxx

  1. Aethervoxx

    [Poll] How do you like new "Convoy" game mode?

    I've played this mode just once - got placed on the Defensive side & we won. The Attackers didn't appear to have much of a clue as to what to do. One thing I didn't like were the Liberty ships just moved without altering their course so it was easy to collide (with them) just trying to defend them by steering beside or amongst them.
  2. Aethervoxx

    New code - HMToaster

    The flag is rediculous. It will gather dust in my storage loft for useless &/or ugly flags.
  3. Aethervoxx

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    This is what you get when the 'contrarian' shows up. 'It' likes to argue while admiring it's typing efforts in a mirror.
  4. My observations on Submarine game play are these; Surface Movement: get as close as you can to wherever you decide to go (usually a cap) before you go to periscope depth. Periscope Depth: get into your torp range & then try to torp something either non-ping or with ping, in order, a BB, a C, a DD (& if at all possible a CV). Sub Surface Depth(s): I still haven't figured this part out enough. This part of Sub operation is the most difficult & what is with this Sub vs Sub underwater torping? I suspect Subs will be about as popular as CVs = not very. The good Sub players will do well (just like with reworked CVs) but most average (or lower) players will likely quit playing them.
  5. You'd 'think' the Convoy Mode would be something like this ..... 1) The Liberty Ships travel across the Ocean Map via a randomly determined spawn on west side of map then proceeding to east side destination point (along a variable AI route). 2) The Defending Ships should be Destroyers and, possibly, Light Cruisers? WG does not have Corvettes. 3) Where the 'H' are the Subs? These should be the Attacking Ships. Like ... DUH! 4) Perhaps Six Subs to Three Destroyers? Some such similar ratio (if there are Six Liberty Ships). This is my suggestion.
  6. Aethervoxx

    New Code

    I like toasters too but not 'poasters' (like that scrawny cat).
  7. Aethervoxx

    Port queens

    pardon me, unnecessary post
  8. Aethervoxx

    Port queens

    I currently have 89 ships and I play them all. How? I have four lists, one with all the ships & three with selected ships. I use D100, D20 & a D8, etc dice to randomly determine which ship I will play .
  9. Aethervoxx

    Mouse Needs Your Help: Part One, Tier VI Ships

    Four battles; Gnevny W, Hatsuhara L, La Galissonniere L & Graf Spee W ( 2 screenshots). I don't Fing know how to expand the 4th window of the after battle report (making this difficult in first place is total BS)
  10. Aethervoxx

    Mouse Needs Your Help: Part One, Tier VI Ships

    Where? I don't see any 'stinking little arrows'. Tell me where on that 4th window you can expand it?
  11. Aethervoxx

    Mouse Needs Your Help: Part One, Tier VI Ships

    Random T6 Andrea Doria Win (from NA server)
  12. Aethervoxx

    Do you think Wargaming are cheap skates??

    No, I doubt WG are cheapskates, not when you consider the luxury prices for their premium high tier ships .......... .
  13. Aethervoxx

    HOUST... Aehm.. WG WE HAVE A PROBLEM HERE!!

    ROFL. That's good. I've not heard it referred to as 'WoWF' before, LOL.
  14. Aethervoxx

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Today, I play random battles to simply complete my contribution to Naval Battles for my clan. What do I see? Twelve stinking losses to just four wins. It's not like I play badly. I try as best I can as a 48%er. There's always other worse players on my team. Odd how 'that' works, isn't it? What utter garbage WG MM cheating. The results should be close to 50% win/loss instead of a STINKING 25% - that's a TOTAL BULLCRAP CHEAT! This is not a random MM. This is a WG MM CHEAT!
  15. Aethervoxx

    Mouse Needs Your Help: Part One, Tier VI Ships

    Random T6 Farragut Loss (due to another BS WG MM cheat)
  16. Aethervoxx

    Crap AI

    It's 'revealing' as to the bias of the MM when a Bot on your team just stops & fails to do anything for a while. Meanwhile, a Bot on the other team plays better than most human players. Oh sure, this is just 'random'. Sure it is.
  17. Aethervoxx

    Respect

    Yes, those 1 v 1 low tier battles are rather tense too, aren't they? You, usually, have to get the first hits in or it's a L.
  18. F1) We are *(use sparingly) ** (Ya, sure, right) F2) You idiot DD F3) You idiot CA F4) You idiot CL F5) You idiot BC F6) You idiot BB F7) You idiot CV F8) You idiot SS F9) Report that AFKer F10) That Whale just got harpooned *(only used for a premium ship that gets sunk) F11) this ! *(used a lot) F12) This MM is ! *(another extremely accurate comment to use)
  19. Aethervoxx

    Why not always like this?

    That's only 6 seconds in the queue & sometimes you see a CV in your battle just because 'we can(e)' (err, care) .
  20. Aethervoxx

    Community Tokens

    You 'revolting wankers' . Eat it.
  21. Aethervoxx

    Soviet CV heads for the middle of the map.

    That's just the kind of reworked CV player we all want to see on the enemy team .
  22. Aethervoxx

    As predicted, cheat torps/subs get a boost

    Welcome to the new RTS Cruiser style of play . The 'play style' where one has to actually 'think' (those 'pesky' Devs , still trying to subvert boring cookie cutter play).
  23. Aethervoxx

    How to lose your new players 101

    I don't think new players bother to stay in T1 - T5 that long (unless they are strictly F2P). Most New players jump to too high a tier cause of shiny premium baubles being dangled before their eyes. Yes, the idiocy of the reworked CVs. I'm sure some new players play them just because they are easy mode (as in co-op play). I don't blame the Devs for the CV disaster - that comes from WoWS Management. The Devs just do as they are told (if they want their pay cheque).
×