Aethervoxx

Total garbage MM. WR is a false statistic. Try explaining a failtard division that camps then runs out & dies pointlessly - amazing how often these imbeciles happen to be on your team. This is why WG products are SICK JOKES. All WG wants is your money. The games themselves? ROFL. The only game for WG is gaming your money (read: stealing your money).

Wasn't this 'another important message for the community' just WGspeak for "we are doing whatever we want to do, as usual". The real WG code is so easy to interpret

Your idea is good, Sir_Sinks_ALot, however, War Failing needs to remove radar ability that goes through land (& islands). After all, we know how financially poor WG is & how swamped with 'essential' projects their programmers are.

We need more Tech Tree Lines to soak up our excess Silver Credits & our excess Free Experience. I understand WoWS Developers are working on a Pan - Asia Cruiser line. This is all well & good for the Asian players. I'm sure they will like this Tech Tree Line. However, there are, I'm sure, a number of other New Tech Tree Lines players would like to see. How about; 1) The (still) missing Ita DD Tech Tree Line. I'm sure Italy had many classes of DDs. 2) A 'European Cruiser' Tech Tree Line. I'm sure there would be plenty of options here. 3) A 'Pan - American' (read Latin or South American) Cruiser Tech Tree Line. I'm sure there would be adequate options here too.

I doubt I changed much of any of my Cpt skills - WF gave us all those anti-Sub gimmicks for free - should be enough (for the most part).

To this proposal, two points; 1) You did a lot of work on this. Why? Don't give free advice or ideas to WoWS/WG. They deserve NOTHING from us but contempt. 2) I would prefer to see a Pan - American DD Tech Tree Line. I'm sure WoWS could do 'that'.

New 'misdesigns' on Ships .... So, what else is new?

WG certainly doesn't.

No. The more turmoil on the water the better.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions even if you might describe those as biases or delusions. I understand the Sub hate. I do not subscribe to that myself. Yes, there are entrenched opinions from many Forumites. These 'twains' (refrains) will, likely, never meet. In reference to this topic; Are Subs 'broken', as in not correctly designed or implemented into this game? Probably, although, this depends on several aspects (not just one thing) of what Subs can/cannot do. Are Subs 'overperforming'? Until some statistics show up & these 'stats' are relevant, we won't be able to say. I'm thinking WG will massage the 'stats' to reflect what they want (to show). Personally, I find Subs difficult to play, hence, I'd say they aren't overperforming nor are they, imho, broken (whatever that means).

I don't know if Mouse wants this one but it was a T6 Random W with my U-69

Perhaps, Einstein is here on the forum, however, he doesn't post. So, Faceoff, you aren't likely to get a response. Karen? I'm sure there's lots of Karens around (especially in Burma/Myanmar) but here? As to 'Karen' here in the forum - no, haven't spotted her.

Since when did WoWS care about 'messes'? I think they only care about any monetization 'misses'.

Not yet. One Spanish premium T6 Cruiser has been announced. This is a far cry from a whole Tech tree line.

The real problem with karma is it is a flawed mechanic &, therefore, meaningless.

Cool. Good job, totally_potato . I'm sure WoWS Developers will give your proposal a considerate look-over. I likely will stop at some lower or mid-tier US BC myself as I frown on purely fantasy designs. I'm OK with actual 'historical' builds & , if necessary, blue print designs.

What intelligence? If the customers were intelligent this game would have died long ago (like around the great CV re-wreak) I doubt this is the case. There will be very good 'Das Boot'ers making games just a miserable as when you have good reworked CVers.

Now, doesn't this just 'figure' when the Ger Subs up to WW2 were far superior . However, this is War Failing we are talking about.

I believe your brain is short circuiting, Pete. It wasn't me who said anything about a 55%WR, so, why were you quoting me (post # 5874 above)?

Earlier today, I was surprised to see both Deckeru_Maiku & MementoMori_6030 in a random battle. They invited me into a Div & then we ran off 5Ws before a L.

Another T6 Andrea Doria random, a W (I have several lists I determine ships from - it's weird that Andrea Doria keeps coming up for T6, lol.

Exactly. Stalinium has irradiated everyone in the NA WG offices.

How can WG possibly weaken their first wreaked rework? This would defeat their decision to shove reworked CVs down everyones throats.