Aethervoxx

What is true is WG allowed battles where one side had CV(s) & the other did not. Also, the idiocy of extreme tier battles as you indicate (a T4 seeing a T10, for example). Wasn't the prime example of player exploitation a battle with a T2 DD up against a T10 BB (the BB could not even harm the DD once it was in close)? Whose fault was this, what you refer to Bear__Necessities? Whose fault but WG who could have ensured this never happened but they allowed this nonsense. Which is similar to the nonsense WG now allows with these broken reworked CVs not to mention the still entirely broken MM. How often are roflstomps (of one form or another) seen these later days of WoWS? Plenty often. Too plenty. As for the +2/-2 MM, even that is being blatantly abused by WG to ensure more high tier (T8+) battles. All to load more players into T9 (as a minimum). Surprise, surprise, where all the fantasy make up premium ships are appearing for sale.

I think some players may intentionally ruin battles because Wedgie , all by itself (via MM & dubious targeting results, etc), ruins battles, therefore, it's a kind of 'revenge' .

T6 Random W New Mexico

T6 Random W Nurnberg

T6 Random W Hatsuhara

T6 Random W Devonshire

T6 Random W Cachalot (Yes, I know it's a 'Sub', lol, it randomed up for play)

Sure, a new WoWS. This would have to be renamed, of course. & you'd have to bar WG completely from any influence on it.

Where does on sign up for 'World of Balanz'? I'm sure many players would PAY to play 'WoB' (, I know .... but I couldn't resist ).

This took some time & rumination (I suppose) to come up with an answer. How often does one think of any ship you thought was garbage - one just ground out the next ship on that line & progressed. I'd posit that everyone has more than one ship that might be a candidate for this honour. Which one? It just came to my consciousness - the Svietlana. I'd breezed by it so long ago & thinking- well, I'll never bother with that again then I had this Ru Cpt I had to find a ship for & for some reason I chose the Svietlana. Likely, cause I didn't have much there tier-wise, however, now I find the Svietlana isn't that bad a Cruiser (but for its main gun reload speed).

For me, it's finishing off my Halsey campaign. I like to grind regular Tech Tree lines to a historical ship (no set tier). I'm waiting for Ita DD line & whatever WG might produce in the future. I will get a Moltke when it's free to access. Otherwise, I like to Div a bit (should Div more) & play some NBs for my clan. T2 to T4 (I have some rare ships there) is quite a bit of fun especially when there's a good number of real players in the Random queue. I hate the horrid CV rework. I would prefer RTS CVs to return. I do not think Subs are utilized properly by WG. Nor do I like any of these Super Ships, nor the farcial Hybrids & certainly not any of the new premium jokes.

Actually 'contrarianism' is a word. it is a word simply by being used even for the first time which is termed 'coining' that word. Just 'edumacating' you, Gvozdika, lol .

To get back on topic - reworked CVs are horrid & the sooner Wedgie returns the RTS CVs to play the faster this game will return to being 'good' again (but, ofc, Wedgie won't).

Easy answer. By imitating WoT corporate playbook .

The alternate names, 'LePantLoad', 'Vittorio Venereal' & 'Crocetti' are , .

Someone who defends reworked CVs? Do you think this is why he got the position? From my experience, the Thought Police are very active & have been, historically, very active on the NA forum (in which case, he will fit right in). Is it any surprise that Wedgie would bring in a 'Yes' man to support what is, arguably, the worst decision (the CV rework) that Wedgie have ever made. Wedgie loves giving out 'atomic wedgies' (it's what they thrive on).

T6 Random Warspite L (grr, typical MM 'balance' issue)

For me & when I noted this it surprised me a little, my Iwaki Alpha with 479 battles (out of 11Kish). I have several list of ships I use to random what I play. The Iwaki Alpha is on 4 of the 5 so it shows up sometimes. I, certainly, do not abuse choosing any ship even the ones I play somewhat better than usual - I just 'random' what I play in random battles.

Holy Heavy Water, that's a critical 'singularity' - I mean, Seal Clubbers who only play T1 don't have nearly those numbers of battles for one ship (as far as I know).

There's always a joker who shows up, now isn't there?

You appear to be solo keeping your own topic kicking (kind of like Dr Frankenstein - animating something already dead).

Actually, Cruisers are supposed to be a 'Jack of all Trades' - able to harass BBs, able to punch CVs, able to punch SSs (Subs) & able to blap DDs so the longer they survive in a battle the better (usually).

This would fragment the player base as if a Star went Supernova .

It sure would be nice if more Forumites here would contribute their T6 random battle results (expanded credits & exp window) for Little White Mouse's project.