Aethervoxx

Then this game has to be restricted to before 1914 as WW1 was when Subs became effective. CVs weren't purposely built until the early 1920s. Also, the HMS Dreadnought was not in service until 1906, therefore, a Naval arcade game with just Battleships, Cruisers & Destroyers would have to be pre-1914 (at the very latest). This restricts this Naval arcade game to the years around 1890 (at the earliest in practical terms) to 1914. One 'might' consider ships from 1871 to 1890 just to include this period of naval development. Since WG barely touches pre -HMS Dreadnought warships and concentrates on WW1 & later Ships, one cannot exclude CVs & Subs as legitimate 20th century ship classes.

The disease is spreading. T4 - the one tier where there is often more CVs in the queue than any other ship class. You know my sentiment here - immediately bring back RTS style CVs. However, as previously noted by some Sage, Wedgie will never admit their horrendous mistake and will continue to give us all 'atomic wedgies' .

Where is WIKI WoWS Leaks?

Yes. No limit to Wedgie depravity I, too, freed myself from rank ranked play .

One of the main Shills just beat your notification of same .

Kill Stealing is both, simultaneously, 'not a thing' and 'a thing'. It all depends on your point of view .

LOL, not to worry, Maris Piper. I stopped giving Wedgie money quite some time ago (not that I've given them that much in comparison to what some likely do). My satire here is entirely directed at the only factor that WG cares about - how much money can they rip everyone off of.

My .................................................................................................................................... is on this possibility, .

'0' or some number very close to that - I no longer even bother to look to note what it is.

This whole post is a joke, right? As if Wedgie is at all interested in any Quality of Life Improvement for WoWS. If Wedgie was, they'd have pulled the plug on this game long ago (like right after the CV rework).

T6 Random L Queen Elizabeth (battle strangely & conveniently ended for them when we were just about to prevail & it wasn't the 15 minute mark either)

OK, already ......

T6 Random L Andrea Doria (Another loss due to really stupid players on my team)

season's greetings

Surely, not ! How could this be ......? Surely, you jest . I'm shocked!

This depends on what you define as 'ship types'. The game is full if you consider the traditional main navy ship types these being; Battleships (BBs) Cruisers (Cs) Destroyers (DDs) Aircraft Carriers (CVs) Submarines (SSs) If one further divides some main ship types you can include; Battle Cruisers (BCs) Light cruisers (CLs) Heavy Cruisers HCs) There are some other definitions of ship types; Armoured Cruisers (CAs) Escort Aircraft Carriers (CVEs) There may be other ship types. I do not include Corvettes, Frigates, Minesweepers or Motor Torpedo Boats as these all appear tp be small naval ship types which WoWS ignores entirely.

Yes. A carefully aimed volley along with a favourable WG targeting result will 'stop your ship from getting out of the way'.

There's only a few ports that look any good at all to begin with & London is not one of them. I like Fjords cause that is closest to my native coast .

Anything remotely resembling this farce of a battle is a 'blatant cheat'.

You still haven't explained the fact that the results were & are only explained by a blatant cheat from WG MM. The bad players, as you rely so much upon in your observation, are not balanced (even remotely equally) in most battles. When it comes to good players the imbalance in the MM is far far worse. This, in itself, is proof the WG MM cheats (not to mention the blatant targeting accuracy cheat one sees so often (for the team favoured by the WG MM cheat). & have I mentioned who spends money in this game? You think WG doesn't reward (even marginally) players who spend money? If you don't there's a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Yes, Ws are better. Even Ls are tolerable when the battles are close & fun. The problems are all the blatant CHEATS/ ROFLSTOMPS (lose or win) that WG MM creates, as in the following illustrated WG CHEAT;

Two blatant MM Cheats. I get harassed by the enemy CV in both battles. I can barely do anything yet I'm not the worst player on my team - not by a long shot. Two total jokes of a battle where it is obvious the MM is blatantly cheating for the one side, especially the second total farce of a battle.

T6 Random L with Warspite all due to a total POS MM CHEAT

T6 Random L with Devonshire

I, too, will report CVs, especially when they play really badly (usually the idiot who is placed on my team - incredible how often 'that' happens considering the MM is 'supposed' to be 'random'). As to blaming anyone? Get real here - it's entirely the fault of Wedgie and the Great CV rework Wreck. Wedgie is the real D1CK here (not the players).