Aethervoxx

WG MM allows this & WG could program this out. WG MM allows this & WG could program this out. If one team gets two bottom tier players( 2 tiers below the top) then where were the compensating two bottom tier players for the other team? Since they weren't there , it is a blatant WG MM CHEAT.

A T6 Random Queen Elizabeth W

Here is a blatant WG MM CHEAT that even the WG butt lickers will not be able to explain, although, they will try. I random a low tier ship, a T3 into the queue & what pops up? A T3/T4 matchup or so I initially thought. Then I look at a 3 player div on my team &, lo & behold, the Div comprises a T3, T2 & T2 ship. That's for my team. Not one T2 ship on the team WG MM cheats for. Instead, the team WG MM cheats for is given a T4 Ark B (just to make sure, ofc). The queue at low tiers says there is no time limit to make up 'equivalent' teams but the MM sure didn't do this, this time. It simply screwed one team intentionally by placing not one but two T2 ships (on the one side) into a T3/T4 battle. Here's the proof WG MM CHEATS.

"looking at it" means ever since WG wrecked CVs to begin with by removing RTS style CVs to screw the game with these idiotic reworked CVs where the incompetents couldn't even (& still haven't) included the original odd tiered CVs. This glaring exclusion just illustrates what a 'half - posterior body part' project the reworked CVs have been since some idiot dreamed them up.

A T6 Random Galissonniere L

The way to solve this problem is to make it suicidal to 'wall ride'. Make it really easy to sink anyone on a boundary line. Then, only intentional & outright suiciders (there are those scum) would do so.

It's an example , I posit, of the forthcoming BBaby mode of game play (slated for Apr 1st) . It reminds me of a weird bathtub with a really wacky lid that some now mad (in both senses) Developer might have been ordered to produce

A T6 Random Gnevny L

Not once yet if you mean getting sunk by one. Not once, either, by even attempting to obtain one. I'm not at all interested in getting any of these Super Ship Farcisms. Has anyone gotten the impression that WG doesn't care at all about this game anymore?

'If' one wants to get a Prime account which is potentially supporting Bezos, the anti-union scumboi. As if Bezos scumboi doesn't have enough money he couldn't possibly give more to his employees (he might go to the poor house). "Are there no workhouses?" Sure, they are called Amazon Prime warehouses. Since I refuse to support Amazon & will never buy anything from them I don't see why I should let Wedgie sucker me into joining just for some BS baubles from WG (another scumbag company, btw)

I suppose I'm overwhelmed with Clemson (53%WR), Z-23 (53%WR), V-25 (54%WR) or Gnevny (51%WR). I suppose I never contributed to any of these Ws although WoWS is a team battle game. I consistently do my part as a DD to scout & cap & shoot/torp as much as possible. I never coward out so, Psych_Boi, go suck on a harpoon.

What do I mean by a 'fractured player base'? I mean one that is incapable of coherent & co-ordinated action. Many talk about not spending money on WoWS product but how many actually do? WoWS (WG) relies on new & ignorant players to keep spending money irregardless of the quality of the product. Some ask for participation in some independent player study & barely anyone in the forum even participates. I reference Little White Mouse study of T6 random battles (go look that up for yourself). Some are only here to tell everyone else to 'git gud' or 'carry harder' & otherwise say it's all on the player but never on WoWS/WG/Wedgie 'arrangements'. ROFL & LOL. We all know who the MEGA-TROLLS are here. Of course, WoWS (WG) wants a fractured player base. In this way, WG can continue vacuuming money with little effective opposition. All we can say is, personally, we won't spend money anymore. I wonder if this WoWS player base can be anything but 'fractured', inherently, incapable of united action &, certainly, not capable of altering the direction of WoWS sending itself into a cesspit. Look at the fractured mirror that is WoT & ask yourself if WoWS won't see (is seeing) the same cracks in it's mirror? IMO, the fractured mirrors are already on the wall (for everyone to gaze into). Time for a new late 20th century/21st century motorized Naval Warfare Game via a crowd source that favours real historical combat as opposed to GARBAGE SANDBOX FANTASY EXCREMENT from WG.

... except the MM does go crazy and it happens not all the time but a great majority of the time ... surely you've seen this ... or are you dazzled by WG omnipotence?

Sounds to me like a great strategy/tactic for Subs. I need to learn to do that, especially, to the farce reworked CVs.

5 DDs per side battles are a lot of fun & challenging to play. I'd like to see more of these battles, not less.

This is your opinion. Other posters here may agree with my opinion. It is only opinion. If you choose to be blind, that's your choice.

The player base here is not the same as on any other game. The player base is different in every game. Furthermore, some games do not have super casuals & tryhards. They just have players who enjoy the game framework. I offer EQ as a great example of a good game (which WG products are not).

This thread is about the 'fractured player base'. There is a purpose to discuss this. It is unfortunate that you cannot, apparently, grasp this topic. Instead, you make direct personal attacks on me alleging 'conspiracy theory' and 'veiled insults at other players' as my long history. I post on all manner of subjects which cannot, in any stretch of your delusional imagination, Bear __ Necessities, be of a negative nature.

IMO, it's because War Failing is too cheap (or too greedy, take your pick) to spend/use the resources to make any new meaningful campaigns. WF may, however, sucker punch us with a 'Sub campaign'.

An excellent response that requires repeating .

Take a close look in your mirror (&, ROFL & LOL, look what a butt ugly moth was caught so soon in the net .

Very, very little to be frank. I only care about new tech tree lines. (preferrably, historical ships, ofc) (but, then WG does the deficient three month delay on offering anything new) (these 'fantasy' barfs they keep coming out with?) (power creep anyone?) The only other thing that may keep me in WoWS & the Forums is Great Satire. (of which, I offer this .... )

Some observant players such as you, flagd, do notice these arranged & farce MMs . Watch out for the incoming shell fire from the resident battery troll retorts .

Wedgie doesn't want matches to be 'even' or 'better'. It only want matches to be over faster & to induce frustrated players to consider spending money on their product. Wedgie already takes 12 players in the random queue & places them on a team then it throws 12 other players into the opposite team which is where the funny business begins. More funny business occurs in the targeting resolutions where your team barely hits but the favoured team (the one Wedgie makes up first) barely ever misses. Of course, who hasn't seen, more often than not, how your team has the two idiots who run out & die right away. Quite telling this is never a 50% occurrence to both teams. Then there's the AFKers. Again, although rather infrequent, quite telling how your team gets more of these scum than the favoured team. Not that it's infallible how Wedgie attempts to 'arrange' battle results. it's subtle. After all, the disadvantaged team can outplay & over perform versus the favoured team, however, since when does a online game company like WG not subtly (or not so subtly) advantage those players who either spend on premium ships and/or spend on premium time. If the spender wasn't seeing some advantage Wedgie would quickly lose too many paying customers. We can ignore the F2P types whatever their individual records - these players just support the paying customers by providing more opponents.

I sometimes watch a you tube video of one streamer or another. Not regularly. Usually, only when there has been some controversy rage & then I see related videos listed (the all seeing algorithm that thinks you'd like these). Sure, these videos show some examples of excellent play/results but can you type 'staged examples'? &, in some cases, who are these self-appointed 'turds' who think their barf ramblings are scripture?