NewHorizons_1

Especially when it's used in the discussion about submarine implementation.

Fair point ... ... but still somewhat unrealistic. It's been dropped from fast DD speed to the speed of an average cruiser.

High speed homing torpedoes Diesel/electric subs that are as fast, underwater, than a high speed destroyer Periscopes that cannot be detected by radar ... ... When has that ever stopped WG?

Is that a graphics card or a drone?

Does anyone actually buy expendable camos nowadays?

Do you mean Super Heavy AP shell skill? I've not used that myself as the penalty does not seem worth it. A legit tactic in PvP is to take out BBs by burning them down, it can even be a problem in Scenarios. And the +25% fire/flood duration seems too high of a price to pay for some more AP damage.

But, to answer OP's question : Mayonnaise, cod-liver oil & beetroot.

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/sales-and-events/chips-for-treats/

IFHE is only worth it for smaller calibre guns carried by destroyers and light cruisers** to penetrate thicker layers of plating. The decision to use it not only depends on gun calibre but also the ship's tier as that affects the thickness of armour you expect on your opponents. Sometimes it is chosen for German battleship commanders to increase the penetration of their secondary guns. But the gains are debatable there. IFHE is never chosen to affect the performance of battleship main battery guns. There's a good, light hearted, guide for choosing IFHE written by LittleWhiteMouse, available here :- IFHE all night long ** I use it on my Atlanta (with small 127mm guns) to good effect.

For giggles

I don't know which is more disturbing. Cap's maniacal mad scientist laugh or Fishie's trying to be Igor but giving off Emperor Palpatine vibes with that black cloak.

Another T10 unlocked. Halloween Vermonster.

Me: Plays more computer games to avoid watching cooking programmes on TV WG: Hold my tin of spam.

Bot CVs can actually be a PITA now, especially for DDs, with rocket & dive bomb planes. Since a few patches ago, their aim is pretty good and evading them can take some doing.

That means turning to the Dark Side though. Though if I keep getting reported for playing well in co-op I may as well.

Scenarios. But WG have managed to that up with the Halloween rubbish.

Me: * Sees a premium CV for sale * Also Me : Yup, that's a SERIOUS bug alright.

Aaahhh. But they're there so you can improve your "Simple Manoeuvres"

Some scenarios were reintroduced (after being pulled some time ago) in the previous patch. Cherry Blossom - raid on an enemy air base Hermes - escort an allied battleship to its escape point Ultimate Frontier - protect a base while it is evacuated by air transports Below is a list of scenarios, but note that the ship constraints are out-of-date since the rework where any T6, 7 or 8 ship can now be used. https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Scenarios Unfortunately, these ops aren't available via random operations while the Halloween event is on.

Bismarck can shoot straight. Atlanta, Flint & Chumphon get a 3.5sec reload. Jutland & Daring get RADAR. KGV & DoY have armour that works.

https://wows-numbers.com You can look up your own stats, for random or co-op, and how well you do in each ship. FWIW, one of the drawbacks of USN BB line up-to, and including, Colorado is the ship's slow speed. A co-op match can be more or less over by the time you have got into a good position. However, it is worth persevering with. T8 North Carolina is a breath of fresh air.

Probably this.

I sure wouldn't want to be the guy wheeled out to defend that dev blog.

Pro tip : Don't mess with colours & formatting. It would be nice for other forum members to be able to actually see what you've posted.