NewHorizons_1

Not sure, WoWS is the only WG title I have so I've no reason to buy WG premium. Could be. Maybe if he played a match and then looked at the CREDITS AND XP tables. That would indicate if the +60% bonus was in effect.

IIRC the XP & credit bonuses are less, +60% for WG premium versus +65% for WoWS premium.

Only op that I had trouble with was Hermes, when in a cruiser. Changing Narai, Newport, Raptor Rescue really was not necessary - only time they would be a loss is if you or your team screwed up. Even though I was relatively new to Cherry Blossom, I though it was tough but fair - a good challenge but certainly possible to win.

* Buy shares in an aluminium foundry * But, FWIW, I tend to use the higher value boosters for operations or high tier co-op where you're more reliably going to make the most out of the bonus.

My crate from the "Super-containers for all" treasury bundle.

Seems to be related to mods. You could try removing mods one-at-a-time until the crash no longer happens.

I'm not sure but Aegis does seem a little different this time around. It used to be the case that BBs were prioritized by the bots, but you now have to be careful in a cruiser too. A couple of times I got finished off like a erm ... banana. I did it today in Cleveland, but had to play quite cagey so like @invicta2012, using cover to limit the number of ships with a line of sight to me.

The DV crate should include the perma bonus to preserve their value.

Correct, the K117 camo. It had improved Commander XP & credits bonuses, compared to the standard T10 perma camo, IIRC.

Not unless you play Pommern or Agir in co-op. There's some notorious potatoes there - their guns aren't even pointing anywhere near the enemy ships. Now there is a worth check for WG - detect those guys and penalize.

Carrying in Defence of Newport. Almost stopped the enemy entering the base but one DD made just before I could reload, so only 3/5 stars. Still, I did get kinda lucky by detonating 3 other destroyers.

I'm just going by the forum vibes.

Looks like WG are still testing it

Indeed. There's many ships that don't qualify for certain missions. Setting fires :- sad Minotaur noises Torp hits :- Most USN cruisers are sad Aircraft shot down : Marblehead shrugs Secondary hits : Thunderer does a hard nope. What is curious by their absence are depth charge hit ribbon missions.

Nice. IIRC, my DV perma camos were Before rework Lightning - Royal Navy Kiev - Victory Banner After rework Mogador - French Navy Buffalo - Bionic Bismarck - Gothic (yuk!) I got both the Kiev & Lightning camos before unlocking the ships, so it made the grind (in co-op) much better. As it turned out, Lightning is one of my fave DDs.

It's not as intrusive as some were predicting. It could be refined though, especially at the start of the match when more ALT-TABing probably occurs. Eg, trigger the notification when Your team spots and enemy ship Your ship gets detected Enemy planes spotted Enemy starts taking a cap zone

It's related to mods. So you could un-install each mod, one-by-one, until the crash no longer happens.

I've had 3 perma camos from DV crates since the eco rework. Funny that, isn't?

It's the same bad joke that Distant Voyage crates have degenerated into.

If the inactivity penalty gets triggered in the first 5 mins, it could be problematic. Doesn't the sub surveillance hydro take 6 mins to prepare?

Do we know what the new conditions are?

The new notification, when ALT-TAB'd, elsewhere is not related to getting a penalty.

With War Hammer 40k demon prince as commander.

Next Year : Kamikaze B

Difference is players are now choosing those ships. Still, would make a big difference to waiting times? If enough players, of surface ships, can be gathered together, without the CV & sub minority, then would 2 or 3 make much impact