arttuperkunas

While I agree with this broadly, it can be difficult for OP to affect this result, especially if he is playing a BB. You lose on points despite most of the team playing decently mainly when your DDs die/you lose cap control. As a cruiser, this can be difficult to mitigate (if your BBs are too far back you can't support your DDs up close), and even more difficult to mitigate as a BB (if you are a solo player, you can't really affect the battle at the caps much if your cruisers/DDs are complete... uh special people).

IMO standard battles already does this well enough. There really shouldn't be a situation where a team that is playing brilliantly would get its base capped; almost invariable standard battles matches are decided by ship losses, not points.

Sorry to hear that. Doesn't help that (IMO) certain aspects of this and other WG games are designed intentionally for just that purpose. Frustration mechanics, addiction etc.

That's not what happens though. Defense in this game is easier than offense, and considerably easier to coordinate/achieve with a team made of random players. The rational way to play this game mode would be to set up a kiting firing line, and take out the attacking ships with focus fire one by one. I mean this is what already happens in randoms, where one team is slightly better than the other. Half of the worse team yolo in and get killed in precisely this manner.

This time with less derp:

This is why I don't do math :P. I had mentally somehow substitute 0,12 for 1/12

That is literally what the calculation above does. There is a 41,9% (and change) possibility that you do not get a ship. So 1 - 0,4189... is 58,1 and change.

Here is (if I understood correctly) the probability of getting a. one ship from 10 containers b. more than one ship 10 containers

Uuuuh statistics is hard. Did I do my math wrong, or is the probability of getting a ship from 10 crates around 58,1%? 1- (11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12 x 11/12) = 0,581 and change

Maybe you picked the wrong thread to be 3dgy in bro. Read up.

I guess? I don't see what the point is though, it's not hard to spot a reroll. I would take that into account when assessing what a player's winrate really means.

(as a side note, @DEEP_SHARKS OP posts are the best - each one is like an absurd, postmodern masterpiece)

I replied with this to OP's earlier thread... It's extremely unlikely WG admins would play a single ship, never mind a whole team of them.

We will never see either Black or Benham for direct sale, I guarantee it. Not when they can dangle them as prizes to buy into various loot box/auction/moneymaking schemes. Or if we do, it will be a sign that the game is actually dying and they wring the last cents from its expiring carcass.

They were, I bought the Massa B directly.

How very boring. It was such a predictable drama machine.

Buying a Black ship also gives you the right to complain on the forums about misreading the small print about that notorious 2,5k doubloon mission.

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/hotfix-game-balance/ "At the moment, we are trying to balance ships according to the "Rock, Paper, Scissors" principle—a particular ship type is effective against some ship types and vulnerable to others" I'll bite. What ship type is effective against submarines? What ship type is effective against CVs? From my point of view, the Wedgie way of balancing is "Rock, Paper, Scissors, Lizard, Spock".

Im pretty sure ragnar is going to be in there toi

And here was me being genuinely pleased when I pulled a Makarov from the shipbuilding container. It felt like I was living the meme, part of the community.

4 dds is good, lessens the likelihood that your yolo rushing fletcher will ruin the game on his own

Imo sub torps are anusable at any range

That’s some iq 200 level of strategy right there. Kinda like when I eat a torp in my dd to “prime my AR” (having actual ar purely optional)

whut? I've read the article, and there was no context. That's literally @tocqueville8's entire point. furthermore, "decency"? doublewhut?

Careful, soon we will be cashing in a DCKRUWERSORRY bonus code.