-
Content Сount
2,062 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
18457 -
Clan
[NWP]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Saltface
-
A Benham wanabee Sorry but couldn't resist. :o)
-
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-CVV_QxU4CesZL5pvdJw4A/videos This is good. For me at least
-
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
in Chrome (and in other browsers) right click the page background and select "translate to english" or whatever language you want -
The counters to DDs are getting disgustingly ridiculous
Saltface replied to mantiscore's topic in General Discussion
2,406/4,103 -
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
I don't know Edit: seems so @ColonelPete -
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
from an "older young man" to another "older young man": 1. Go to this site - https://proships.ru/ 2. Enter your nickname - you will end up here - https://proships.ru/stat/eu/p/536286779-IanH755/ 3. Add the dates to the URL - like - https://proships.ru/stat/eu/p/536286779-IanH755/all/h/2020-01-01~2020-06-15/ - for the last six months 4. Change the dates in the URL as required. It has been a pleasure to be of service, however credits to my clan mate that did exactly the same for me cos I couldn't @ForlornSailor -
The Flood of German Premium Ships Worries me.
Saltface replied to Sunleader's topic in General Discussion
not -
The Flood of German Premium Ships Worries me.
Saltface replied to Sunleader's topic in General Discussion
Or, as the subs are free for now, go and play the game mode (play all class of ship not only sub) and not let that game mode be populated by Bots. We would have a far clearer picture if we all did that. Because, my friend, if we all played a bit of subs...it would look more like random and less like coop. -
The Flood of German Premium Ships Worries me.
Saltface replied to Sunleader's topic in General Discussion
If the German market for the game is so big (as I suspect it is) it makes sense. Better sell the ships that let people grind them as silver ships (free) Off Topic (lol I couldnt resist) I think the current Sub game mode is not representative of the Sub game-play, if and when and how it will end up in the game. This is my feeling. So, I find it very speculative to say anything at this point in time. Lets see the next iteration. -
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
better say "I would suspect someone bought .... " -
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
παρακαλώ ρε, translation: Lossi: THX dude (no way to translate re) Salt: You are welcome dude Kindly excuse mother tongue civility between two Greeks. -
why is winrate system a real shame for WG?
Saltface replied to citaDELer's topic in General Discussion
@citaDELer, @bratisla_boy here is how you get the win rate of any time period. https://proships.ru/stat/eu/p/558917089-Saltface/all/h/2020-01-01~2020-06-15/ (obviously the stat page is mine lol) 1. Go to proships; 2. find your profile; 3. Just plug in the dates. Case closed. Now we can have all our moving window of time for our stats. -
Well,.......I would disagree, but my disagreement would be based on my personal experience. Maybe it doesn't work for everybody.
-
@Floofz, Some data could be found here (pinch of salt please!)
-
thank you very much, very kind of you to answer.
-
I will agree that steamrolls are not adding anything to anyone's game entertainment. As a matter of fact they are rather frustrating. WG recently posted a statistical analysis of the time battles last. I tried to find it but maybe I was a bit lazy. So, I will take the easy way out. ( @ColonelPete if you have the data could you please post them of send them to me with a message) I have this very bad attitude not to believe anything without back up information, data and facts. Neither I will reject a hypothesis put forward by someone without evidence. (well....except if it is patently nonsensical) Dear @Floofz, lets look at the data if we find it. As I cant debate on this issue on the basis of "my feeling" I ll drop this subject for now. I will cordially disagree my friend. For me, MMM is a net negative to my game experience. I used it and found it to be: a. unreliable and b. frustrating. With experience (which I know that you have as I have looked at your performance statistics) we can easily find out, in less than 3, 4 minutes in the battle, everything. So, the utility of MMM (at least for me) is debatable. I usually know from the first moves of a player if he is good or bad. But, really I hate looking at the team line ups and the pop up telling me you lost this game. Furthermore, maybe this is a bit of confirmation bias on my side - self check, but I can suggest that more times than not it has been proven wrong. Thanks for the conversation Regards Could be, I only touched DDs after the rework. So, I cant really know.
-
Welcome back, You have been away for a long time mate. Better hold on to your coal as @Hanse77SWE suggested. I wouldn't be surprised if your next thread was about the game having changed a lot. Regards'
-
I have no evidence to the contrary, but, neither do you have any evidence whatsoever to support your claim. However, I feel that the burden of evidence falls on you, my friend, on this one. As you are the one making the claim. I shall refrain from speculation because, honestly, it is not worth it. I would also suggest you stop using MM monitor.
-
so it is a problem of the player base not the MM, right? The MM made random teams back then as it does now. Simply, back then (romantic nostalgia I might say) things were better. So, what is it? It doesn't look like MM is the problem. You are describing an indifferent playerbase not bad matchmaking
-
What was different back then? Did the mechanics of the MM change since? well the +-3 changed but I guess this is not what you are talking about.
-
Limit bots or really bad players to Coop
Saltface replied to Zen71_sniper's topic in General Discussion
I agree. Thank you for considering a clarification. On a second note: Yes you are an elitist. I am an elitist. But elitist is a good word. Definition: In WoWs Forum an Elitist is the player that loves the game and doesn't play just for fun. -
Limit bots or really bad players to Coop
Saltface replied to Zen71_sniper's topic in General Discussion
stop this my friend. I beg of you. Don't accuse people for elitism. And you should know better that our fellow forumite is just expressing frustration. BTW if by elitist you mean the people that LOVE the game in contrast to others that just play for fun, then my friend, I AM A PROUD ELITIST regards -
Limit bots or really bad players to Coop
Saltface replied to Zen71_sniper's topic in General Discussion
A fratello mio, really bad is not BOT. My dearest friend your title calls for bad players removal. I totally agree about BOTS, I disagree about bad or really bad players. If you can find a way to find out who is griefing, AFKing, YOLOing etc on purpose, then ban them also. Until we have real proof how can we kick out players that might be also paying customers? I share your frustration, but, I guess I m older and more easy to say "yeah, ok, it happens" OK now I also shared my opinion. Thank you very much for the compliments I don't know if I deserve them. Regards -
Limit bots or really bad players to Coop
Saltface replied to Zen71_sniper's topic in General Discussion
Very bad answer. I think I made up my mind. You are suggesting that you are such a good player that when the others see how good you are follow you around? Or they run scared away or focus you because they know you are good? I suggest you should really try to involve the prefrontal cortex in game and in forum not only the limbic system. -
Limit bots or really bad players to Coop
Saltface replied to Zen71_sniper's topic in General Discussion
in how many battles? 300? What you are saying is either blatantly untrue or a statistical paradox. I will not take your word for that. Your stats are hidden. (fishy) If it is untrue I am calling you out for being a close relative of Baron Von Munchausen. If it is a statistical paradox please post a screenshot of your stats.
