antean

You do realize, Yaskaraxx (& anyone else of similar thought) that the new CVs, besides their own continuing 'issues' also require all other ships & ship classes to be altered as well. This is not a mark of a good 'workable' anything. It is, rather, an indication of an utter failure. As to 'entertaining'? ROFL. C'mon, Yaskaraxx, I took you to have more brains than your comment here appears to be lacking. Have you seen what Redcap, the OP of the CV Cpt's cabin has decided to do? That says it 'all you need to know' about the CV rework.

I see, Yaskaraxx, you've gone to the dark side. On principle, I will never play the, imho, FARCE reworked CVs. btw, Thanks again for that freebie Asashio. Can't say I play it well tho it is an exciting kind of DD to play (living on the 'edge of deletion' if you get my drift, lol).

You missed, entirely, the StL & Charleston not too mention the Varyag & Aurora StL - like ships. Nothing wrong with 'clones'. I'm still waiting for the release of a Western Dragon & a Northern Dragon. Do I need more Myoko clones? No. However, I want to collect all four Dragons (that is, if WF ever gets around to offering them).

No amount of delay will 'fix' the FARCE CV rework. No, they have not.

FYI, Uber Ghost is most popular on NA server - here I believe there's more variety being voted for. I wonder what the RU Server(s) are trending towards ……..

Easy to answer this one, Robber_Baron, undoubtedly from the many Russian players who swallow revisionist history lessons on Stalin & 'stalinium' (he's still 'big' over there)

Well done. Well researched, Tzoli. +100.

Hmmm. SeasickOllie, I thought this was a vote for just the Leningrad. Then I noticed (well re-read the post title, lol) it's also for the Minsk. Pardon my ignorance, but aren't the Leningrad & Minsk different ships? Or are they the same design? Same class/tier? Why wouldn't WoWS not want to have a different perm - camo for each ship? This way we get to see two new perma - camos.

What do you expect from a Byelo-russian/Cypriot Russian/Russian based internet wargaming company? Of course, Russian stuff will get 'preferred' treatment. In other words, if you (we, that is) don't like it, tough. There are, at least, 4 or 5 choices for a permanent camo design here - all quite attractive. Choosing one only is tough. Maybe, WoWS might use more than one of these perma - camo ideas on future Russian ships, especially, #1s 1, 3, 11 or 12 (tho one of these is likely the Leningrad winner). A last point, this is an arcade game & WG can put whatever camo they want on their ship models - the only restriction being laws of the countries WG operates in. Fact is, the UK, USA & USSR (plus others) won WW2 so their 'symbols' have few or no restrictions. The main losers, Ger & Jap get the sanctions (for specific war crimes) and this is as it should be.

I really like torpeditis so it got my vote tho the Lenin's Revolution is leading - it looks rather cool too. The 'Blue' one looks good too tho maybe a bit too garish/ornate. There are a couple that shouldn't even be on this list like #12 & that 'blah' shark mouth one.

WG thinks, I'm guessing, everyone will be auto - playing T8 CVs. LOL This kind of diversity for reworked FARCE CVs is not good. Let's not just have one or two failtard T8 CVs. Let's sucker the rubes into thinking they are actually getting something different X8. ROFL.

Oooooo. Snagged a live one here folks. Just wait till this one sees the reworked FARCE CVs. Hear the whining then, lol. *edit

Too bad, the ARP ships look 'cool' to me. I wish I could give away the ARP ships I don't play. Let others who want one have one. I'm not an anime/manga generation person at all. In fact, the depiction of anime/manga pre or pubescent females is juvenile male lechery. (I'm guilty too, lol) On topic, I cannot post a memorable battle every day & this battle I mention was on NA server …. I had, probably, one of my best ever battles with my GZ. Some say it is OP - I doubt that. It was a battle that it looked as though my team might lose & then I started sinking one enemy ship after another. I'm still not sure how I did that but for good fortune & continually moving my CV & staying relatively close to the action. I sank either 4 or 5 (or was it 6?) ships. Best outing ever.

Edited

LOL. I predict the level of anti - CV whining will reach new high decibel levels.

Nor do Scharnhorst players shamelessly boast, although grats on shredding all those planes. I play here in EU from NA (the far west side of NA). WG allows anyone to have an account on any server. I quite like the EU server (much better than NA one, imho).

Sure. How about this stone? What is the point of your troll thread here? I expressed my opinion - some players deserve to get toxic commentary. I'm not the only one who you, Atankean, are attacking for posting on your thread. This certifies you as a troll. Go back under your bridge & bellow there.

whining (apparently)

Some players do admit to making mistakes & fudging up. It doesn't happen that often but it does happen. As to 'toxicity', Atankean, some players deserve what they get.

LOL. Since when were CVs hard to kill unless the player is stupid or something. CVs got 'stalinium' now, Pikkozoikum? Last ship on the battlefield? LOL. If they go hide in a corner, maybe. Quit spouting your generalized falsehoods, Pikkozoikum.

I'm 100% sure I'm getting rid of all CVs.

I see some here mention legit reason(s) why a player may be AFK in a battle. The main one may be due to a disconnection. Fine. However, a player can quickly reconnect (in 2 mins?) even if one has to do a complete reboot. Loading into the game, itself, may be slow but not more than 2 mins (at most). There has to be a hard time cap of, say, 3 minutes. If the player has not moved from the spawn point after 3 mins, WoWS should auto - boot that player and hard sanction them. That AFK player should be replaced by the very first player in queue who fits the MM parameter for that match. There would still be a 3 min disadvantage but, at least, there would be a replacement player. There are just too many players who start a battle then intentionally go AFK thereby screwing their team (11 other players). These 'scum' & they are 'scum' have to be sanctioned & sanctioned hard.

Well, Ioppantorkel, your poll has a big error in it. You get all these responses but there is no way to co-relate/distinguish the answers given according to the type of player answering. Right there, all the responses are pretty much meaningless. All you are capturing is the player current opinion (in general). For reference, I'm a F2P 'Freeloader' w less than 3k battles who answered 'nothing' to all the questions cause how could I answer honestly otherwise. btw, I, flukily, got a freebie black Mass from a container drop & was gifted an Asashio (by we all know who, lol) so credit earning, my big problem was, essentially, solved.

WG intervenes already. Wonderful, more 'divine' intervention bandaids, wonderful. We sure can't have the Rats waiting for their 'trick or treat' now can we considering the kiddies want 'it' now (not in 5, 4, 3 or even 2 minutes - the world might end in 'that' time). The problem is/was 'heads'. This FARCE smells of too many heads. Or was it the owner (one 'big' head) who just wants more money? Watch the school of herring come in, get slaughtered, hear the screaming, see the bandaid 'fixes', watch the herring disappear.

LOL. Agreed, some of us can actually think independently. That is the point. WG should not listen to the 'whiners'. Also, there's an easy solution. Do what the OP suggests & don't buy this particular 'Lollipop'. Don't be a WG Sucker.