Besserwisser3000

Yes, 3 days in a row bad luck. Please. How much do they give you for your services?

No, it`s because I am a good DD player. The Chi-Squared Test is unsuitable for a team matchup environment. Btw, I am losing again today. Hard. Games where I have zero chance to impact. At any tier. Roflstomps where my team just dies within minutes. I am at 33% for today. 3 [edited]3 percent. And both wins were hard carrys where I almost lost. Keep pulling excuses for WG out of your asses, it won`t change reality. PS: Even if the Chi-Squared Test was suitable, it would not explain how I would lose hard on 3 consecutive days. All of a sudden. Close to chargeback, [edited]you, WG.

Anyone should understand by now that people like you were correct: They should have fixed the old CVs, e.g. by getting rid of strafing and nerfing them to some degree. Old CVs were excessively powerful at high tiers, but they were not permanently attacking you. I for one had the feeling that my AA at least posted some kind of threat to the CV, because he had to manage his aircraft stock. Now the CVs at T8 and 10 just crap on everything and never run out of planes (unless they are dumb).

Zero CV cap when? By now the WG devs should have finally realized that CVs are bad for the game. Well, "should". Never gonna happen, I know. They have no clue, as seen in premiums such as GC.

How about you take up a statistics class before posting? Thanks. Just a small hint: the chance of a 60 or even 55% win player to suddenly drop to 50% or less over a sample size this large is basically zero.

Really, how can someone with your WTR and WR even tell me about how to play the game? No stat shaming, just the truth. My WR at T9 is still around 60%. And I can`t even [edited]win at T6 today. But keep deluding yourself, WG is happy about any gullible customer.

Last 21 days: 81 games at T9, 40 losses. How large does a sample size have to be? This has been going on for even longer than the mentioned 21 days. And I don't see how a 50% wr reflects a wtr above 1900. I play op mid tier DDs, because at least I can carry the garbage WG puts on my teams in them. Im not good enough to hard carry against WGs algorithm at high tier. Their algorithm is not directed towards me personally, of course. But I have no doubt that this shady [edited]company is actively trying to push down high win rates.

17 games in Alaska: 41% win. 49 games in Kronshtadt: 75% win. Just had 6 games with 5 unwinnable roflstomp losses. T9 WR tanking since I reached 60% solo win. Hope you WG devs *edited*, you *edited*. Can't believe I spent 6k doubloons to get that ship. But nvm, I will let premium run out and will never again spend a cent on this game. Edit: I will refrain from insulting WG employees as soon as you turn off your dumb algorithm [edited]me over. So thanks, but no. Please refrain from insulting players or WG employees. Kind regards, Arty_McFly

Oh another T9 premium to suffer from WGs retarded low IQ MM.

It`s not just you. WG is Edited completely failing at balancing a game. Just had a T10 game with T8 CVs not running out of planes while constantly attacking even multiple T9+ ships. Now they are not only Edited to make a proper MM in terms of player skill and ship distribution (i.e. radar), they also give you constant 2 CV games. No need for futher explanations. Vote with your wallet. Edit: Insults will never be a solution for any problem. Excavatus

The space ship battle reveals that uptier and downtier has little to do with how crappy the MM is. Many players are just too goddamn potato for this game. Ever wondered why your T6 DD spawns on the same side as the enemy T8 DD? Because they want to allow these potato players to succeed once in a while by completely outmatching others, even better players. They will never change MM.

Kurze Zwischenfrage: Spielst du alleine und hast keine Probleme, oder in einer Division? Ich persönlich möchte bei 2 CV im Spiel am liebsten kotzen gehen und kann es bedingt verstehen, wenn schlechte DD-Spieler dann aufgeben. Zumal CVs in T8 und 10 definitiv zu stark sind. Sie machen Schaden auf BB-Niveau, spotten unentwegt, countern jede Klasse, etc. T8 CV in T10 ist natürlich nicht so toll, aber da kann die Shokaku sich ganz sicher zu vielen der anderen T8-Schiffe gesellen. In einer Hipper geht dir auch keiner ab, wenn du mal wieder ins T10-Match kommst.

But they are slow and predictable. You seem to have been playing T4 and 6 carriers, those two are more or less fine. My comment was directed towards T8 and 10.

3k, oh you mean the amount of damage a BB gets if the enemy suddenly turns and he only gets one pen or a couple of overpens? Nonono, we can`t have THAT on CVs, otherwise they could not just crap on everything.

Update am Montag, nicht am Mittwoch. Ihr könnt nicht einmal eure eigenen Routinen einhalten, WG. Peinlich. Eure Space-Battles könnt ihr euch dahin schieben, wo die Sonne nicht scheint. Gleich neben das dümmliche AA update und die Premium-CVs. Denn währenddessen habt ihr nichts getan, um das Problem der viel zu starken DB zu beheben. Oder mal das erbärmliche MM zu überarbeiten.

And here I thought that any ship class is supposed to be weak against another class. God forbid they make CVs weaker against DDs. Apparently CV players would like something like /GodMode. Pathetic.

Any game without CV is better than with. So my wallet will stay closed until they do something about this. I don`t pay to be perma spotted in my DDs. WG is really good at making dumb balance changes and decisions.

You had 50% win? Ever thought about the possibility that you were part of the problem?

Not a stellar carry, but a testament of how [edited]garbage the WG MM is. There is no carrying so many useless clowns.

Der andere Forist hat sich in meinen Augen bereits dadurch diskreditiert, in einem Gamig-Forum Beleidigungen zu Straftaten zu erklären. Wohl jeder hier dürfte verstehen, dass das diskutierte Wort in Onlinespielen dazu dient, andere Spieler als dumm zu bezeichnen. Dafür brauchen wir keine Sprachpolizei. Einfach mal ein dickeres Fell zulegen.😙

Sind mongoloide Menschen weniger wert? Willst du uns das damit sagen? Denn sonst wäre es ja keine Beleidigung für dich. Und jetzt bitte kein "aber...", das würde es nur noch peinlicher machen. 🤣

Also ich gerate zu 90% in diese Situationen, weil zu viele meiner Mitspieler auf einmal beschließen, lieber Klebstoff zu schnüffeln und entweder zum Kartenrand verduften oder yolo in den Gegner fahren. Am Ende muss ich dann alles riskieren oder halt verlieren. Willkommen bei WoWs.

Ok, so how about this: I just just a game where the Midway just rushed into our spawn, spotting 5 of our ships. I had 2 Yamatos shoot at me within the first minute and got hit by one shell: citadel. In the meantime, the Midway took, away 40% of a FdGs hp. And after he was gone, it took like 20 seconds for him to come back with another squadron. And that CV player has a WTR of 1100. Do you think such a player has such an impact in any other class? If you think that`s fine, there is no helping you.

Any reason why the # 10 in the T5-7 DD ranking is Galcinus, who doesn't appear to have played during the past months? https://wows-numbers.com/player/509814742,Galcinus/progress/ https://worldofwarships.eu/en/community/accounts/509814742-Galcinus/!/pvp/overview/ Is that the reason you guys can't publish transparent data? Or am I missing something? Just took one random sample and there you go. But then again, you guys also failed to properly explain that you are looking for maximum base xp in a single match. There you go, that's how you explain it in one sentence. So what did I expect.

That's patently wrong. For example, the tech tree T10 CVs have normal win rates on par with tech tree BBs. If you filter for the best 5% or 10% of all players, CVs outwin BBs. At T8 CVs outwin BBs at any percentile of the distribution.