GevIon1

I try to be as civil as possible in light of these proposals, so only suggest to give a similar refund for IJN destroyes that you offered for carriers. Free XP for ship research, credits for hulls and torpedo-related modules, dubloons for permanent camos.

There is a widespread excuse for losing in ranked: there are "star savers" who ignore winning and go for the top spot to save their star in case of defeat. Such player has high average XP but low winrate. If someone has low XP, he won't save stars, if someone has high winrate, he is a good player who deserved saving his star. After analyzing thousands of profiles found on the site wows-numbers.com, I've found that there is no significant amount of such players. Winrate and XP correlate well, those who save stars are players with good winrate, the system works as intended. So please don't blame other players for "not playing to win, just selfishly farming damage", because it's just a myth. Here are two of my detailed posts: https://greedygoblinblog.wordpress.com/2018/06/05/world-of-warships-the-myth-of-the-star-savers/ https://greedygoblinblog.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/final-statistics-star-saving-works-star-savers-dont-exist/

At first, I'm baffled by your super-inflated ego to claim that your personal experience can beat any statistics, no matter how flawed it is. Also, you failed to understand the most basic premises. The diagonal is obvious (higher winrate = higher XP). However for star savers to exist, they must have better XP than the baddies at the same winrate. However all low winrate players have low XP, there are no significant low-winrate high-XP players. Your example has below average frags and below average XP (his PR is also low). So he didn't save stars too often. He is simply a bad player. How could he rank out? Because an average player saves a star 1/7 of the time (1 star to save, 7 players). Also, the irrevocable ranks give you free star saves (if you are at rank 10, you save your star every loss). So over 1000 games he could rank out without any successful star saving.

"Statistics over the whole competitive ranked is wrong because my personal experience says so" Please link the profile of a SINGLE "star saver" and we can talk.