-
Content Сount
85 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
3660
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by aI_Sai_Far_Q
-
JUST a suggestion okay? There's nothing at all wrong or faulty with the Engine Boost consumable for Battleships It has its uses but IMO doesnt give me advantage when you think of the deceleration time not often! When I'm using a large Battleship I don't really use that much speed really because there's no getting around rocks and such landscape with a large BBs manoeuvrability it is maybe handy for some kid who likes to charge around looking for a chance for a collision but thats not what most want is it loads of fools charging around like that Now in the port screen looking at a tier 8 ship like the Richelieu when checking what consumables I can fit er out with I do not have a choice but to use engine boost and it would be nice if I had a choice other than have to have the engine boost Heres the rub if Id bought a big battleship in the main game and I saw this lack of choice - wouldnt I just be disgusted after seeing the lack of choice oh yes you bet I would!
-
Not a bit - a hell of a lot silly! As 'Camouflages' go these U.Jax they're brutal Also how can they be even called Camouflage when they stand out so - that's oxymoronic.
-
Oh God I hope we are not forced into it either in the main game when 079 updated It was highly irritating to be directed to this mode on selecting an ordinary mission From selecting a mission I wanted/expected a toe-to-toe cqb a slugging match with another BB to up the commanders skill in random mode
-
In Steam Warships Steams effort in particular, I had this awful reoccurring set or problems on start of battles Three types: the critical error as MrConways shown above + freezeups on battle start + a blinding error upon battle start the view turns all black. But Its fixed for now and ticket closed. But I had to run quite the procedure to have some hope of avoiding said freeze-ups and I nearly got banned from playing by the auto punisher as I was status pink for so many unsportsmanlike exits What I had to do before launching as Admin 1> Add all WoWS game folders to my AVG antivirus' whitelist 2> Make sure these game folders were UNCHECKED on the properties panel Attributes-Read-only checker - this damn thing has to be unchecked before every Launch into the game!! AND you have to navigate to folders inside Steams properties using browse local files button or I believe it wont apply properly enough to safely Launch 3> Then I had using Steams sort of navigation to find in folder called ''bin'' "clientrunner exe" its launcher and right-click that to run it as administrator 4> Now Ive 'Pinned it to Start' thats not so tedious So if you getting clobbered by any of those 3 bastard showstoppers it might be worth the trouble to try these steps It goes for the main game too ofc though I havent yet had to run that as Admin or repeatedly uncheck the folders Attbs read-only thing Now the freeze-up error is back (after all those measures and none were needed in 0.7.7) I just want to know: Are these freeze ups just my experience or are there loads of people having grief IOW how many tickets about errors are associated with the 0.7.8. update? The game installed through Game Centre (x64 based I believe?) is no longer giving me those freeze-ups So has the fact that Steams Warships version is just an x32 based version and that not giving enough virtual memory thus causing the freezeup bother? Is it worth my while reinstalling Warships on Steam ever again?
-
This is the Auto Punisher it will get you it has no mercy - it will hit you and hit you ...even if your down and even when the exit was not your fault it will keep striking striking striking so if you have a problem you are doomed, ye pooor foooools, doomed aiieeeegh heeeee hehehehehheeeee heeeeee hheheheheheee ahheeee (demonic laugh continues and fades to exit )
-
My problem also but with the Public Test for version 0.7.9 FYI on the live server (main game played through Steam) I tried to get into a game about 4:30 am and saw an error message I've never seen before "Server Overload Please try again with another type of ship or game mode" On trying that I could not change the mode to Co-op the mode button was frozen - stuck on Random Some kind of notice to us on the PT client about game availability is a NECESSARY COURTESY for those of us about to get in and play Who likes waiting around for 4 - 5 minutes IN VAIN!! (in italics: not the wording of the error exactly)
-
"Yeah, no." What the hell do you mean?
-
all I got was a load of abuse of some idiot calling me a noob and stuff like that. Well its his own time he is wasting isnt it by getting that obnoxious See if you cant distract him some more by counter-accusing that he is a "gobshyte" they usually dont know what this Irish expression means as they are typically pig ignorant but think themselves smart. For example of such obnoxious pig ignorance theres an Arse by the name of TheLeroy who cant have gone to school much who said " I hope your mom dies on cancer" to someone in chat
-
You're suggesting here that I'm not a good player - why? Was it because I stated, in other words, that I think the Atlanta's rate of fire is verging on the magical and is not fair; not balanced and should be toned down to the point that it is fair & balanced? It's a rhetorical question so don't bother responding. You make me sick you horrible little man
-
I never had this ship and am not likely to buy it. And your point is - clear as mud - want to try again?
-
Balance!?" o_0 havent you ever been hosed by an Atlanta - by that interminable stream of HE ?? If that unbelievable kind of thing cannot be nerfed in the battle then it shouldn't be allowed
-
its seems more difficult than french kissing a cobra - to convey feedback to the developers of Wo.Ws. The only way I saw on the my client program in the game center to give feedback led to a webpage where I had to submit a ticket and that was not what I wanted - was just to convey an idea for a youtube tutorial the various artillery ballistic arcs are different from different nations ships
And some other less expensive way to buy Silver from the shop that might exist in the Buy Doubloons area where I can spend 5 to 10 euro for a decent amount of silver for modules
That whole War games shop seems to exist for rich folk who can afford to buy whole ships at a time ffs !
thats all!
-
Thanks BeauNidl, I heard a Developer on Twitch say that there was a fairly big change coming (possibly in 0.7.6) to the clan screen interface
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I got invited and joined a Clan [nvm which] so there's a new tab in the main dock/Port screen top right area. On getting into that I see a bunch of base facilities & when I click them a new screen detailing the facility with a popup on rolling over which says "Only for players with access" presumably a subset within my clan- But how do I even know if and when I get access fgs? I have asked in the clan conversation box but I never get any answers/replies. Well I'm sick of this gnomic sh1t already xP
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I see but the difference was obvious enough as it was this cosmetic change is myeh - just gilding the lily
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have noticed that on the da mage control & repair party consumables there are now double carets (like a corporal badge)
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I haven't mentioned yet that I play this through the Steam client.
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
By the time I reach that sure I'll be too old to hit the On button on my PC
- 19 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ok thank you all again
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thank you all particularly Xanta99 for your info & advices, Btw I've earned 270 units oil so maybe now I could get some access?
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
- 19 replies
-
- facilities access
- onjoining
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
